Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Additive Manufacturing Qualification

ASecurity

Use when qualifying a powder bed fusion or directed energy deposition build, when a build parameter change needs energy density re-verification, or when preparing the AM qualification record and witness coupon plan. Define and validate the additive manufacturing process parameter set for aerospace parts: record the layer height, laser power, scan speed, and hatch spacing, compute the volumetric energy density from those four build parameters, size the witness coupon sample plan for material p...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongo

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill additive-manufacturing-qualification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Additive Manufacturing Qualification?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Additive Manufacturing Qualification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-additive-manufacturing-qualification/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-additive-manufacturing-qualification)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: additive-manufacturing-qualification
description: "Use when qualifying a powder bed fusion or directed energy deposition build, when a build parameter change needs energy density re-verification, or when preparing the AM qualification record and witness coupon plan. Define and validate the additive manufacturing process parameter set for aerospace parts: record the layer height, laser power, scan speed, and hatch spacing, compute the volumetric energy density from those four build parameters, size the witness coupon sample plan for material property verification, and check the additive manufacturing qualification record for first article completeness. Trigger: additive manufacturing, volumetric energy density, laser power, scan speed, hatch spacing, layer height, witness coupon, powder bed fusion, AM build parameter."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: as9100
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: manufacturing-quality
pack: manufacturing-quality
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: manufacturing-quality
  subdomain: additive
  tags: [additive, manufacturing, qualification, laser, power, scan, speed, hatch, spacing, layer, height, energy, density, volumetric, witness, coupon, powder, bed, fusion, am, build, parameter, material, property, verification]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# Additive Manufacturing Qualification (manufacturing-quality/additive/additive-manufacturing-qualification)

Use when the task is qualifying an additive manufacturing (AM) process
for aerospace production: powder bed fusion or directed energy
deposition parameter set definition, volumetric energy density
verification, witness coupon sample planning, material property
verification, and first article checks for AM parts.

## Domain quick reference

- AM parameter set: layer height, laser power, scan speed, hatch
  spacing. The four build parameters pin the energy input to the melt
  pool for a powder bed fusion or directed energy deposition build.
- Volumetric energy density: VED = laser power / (scan speed x hatch
  spacing x layer height), in J/mm^3 with W, mm/s, mm, mm. A build
  parameter change without VED re-verification is a qualification gap.
- Witness coupons: test coupons built with the same parameter set and
  machine as the production parts. The sample plan maps material
  property tests (tensile, fatigue, hardness) to coupon counts, with
  one spare coupon per test type for re-test.
- Material property verification: coupon test results recorded against
  the parameter set; a missing test or an out-of-specification result
  blocks qualification.
- First article checks for AM parts: build file traceability, machine
  id, parameter set match, coupon results, dimensional report, and any
  required non-destructive examination.
- AS9100 link: AM process qualification sits under production control
  and quality management; AS9100 is referenced, not reproduced.

## Workflow

1. Define the AM parameter set: layer height, laser power, scan speed,
   hatch spacing. build_parameter_set() records the four parameters and
   computes the volumetric energy density.
2. Size the witness coupon sample plan: witness_coupon_count() returns
   the coupon count from the material property sample plan (total
   samples plus one spare coupon per test type).
3. Verify material properties: record coupon test results against the
   parameter set.
4. Run the first article checks for the AM part: build file, machine,
   parameter set match, coupon results, dimensional report, and NDT.
5. Assemble the qualification record and check completeness:
   build_qualification_record() and validate_record() flag any missing
   field (parameter_set, witness_coupon_plan,
   material_property_verification, first_article_inspection).
6. Validate inputs first: non-numeric or non-positive build parameters,
   malformed sample plans, and malformed records raise ValueError
   instead of returning a silent result.

## Pitfalls

- Confusion with special-process-qualification: the general special
  process qualification record (PQR) governs welding, heat treatment,
  and NDT processes with a validity interval; this leaf qualifies AM
  parameter sets with energy density and coupon evidence. An AM build
  is qualified by parameters and coupons, not by a PQR-style interval.
- Confusion with as9102/first-article-inspection: the AS9102 FAI forms
  remain the general first article inspection program. The AM first
  article checks here are build-specific (build file, machine,
  parameter set match, coupon results) and feed the FAI; they do not
  replace it.
- Unit mixing: VED in J/mm^3 needs W, mm/s, mm, mm. Converting the
  scan speed to m/s or the hatch spacing to cm changes the result by
  orders of magnitude.
- Missing hatch spacing: energy density computed from three of the four
  parameters is undefined, not approximate.
- Coupon count vs specimen count: the sample plan maps tests to
  coupons; the count includes the spare coupon per test type so a
  re-test does not require a new build.
- Energy density outside the qualified envelope: a parameter change can
  keep parts dimensionally acceptable while pushing VED outside the
  qualified window; re-verify before production runs.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The qualification logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_additive_manufacturing_qualification.py against
scripts/additive_manufacturing_qualification_logic.py (stdlib unittest,
offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_additive_manufacturing_qualification.py

## Compliance

- Standards referenced, not reproduced: AS9100 frames AM process
  qualification within production control; summary-only per
  standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →