Skip to content
Back to skills

Scenario Matrix

ASecurity

Generates a behavioral scenario acceptance matrix for comprehensive test coverage planning. Maps user scenarios to acceptance criteria with stable IDs.

  • 85 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 28, 2026
ai-agentsrusttesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 28, 2026

npx -y skills add ash1794/vibe-engineering --skill vibe-scenario-matrix --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Scenario Matrix?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Scenario Matrix
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ash1794-scenario-matrix/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ash1794-scenario-matrix)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: vibe-scenario-matrix
description: Generates a behavioral scenario acceptance matrix for comprehensive test coverage planning. Maps user scenarios to acceptance criteria with stable IDs.
user-invocable: true
---

# vibe-scenario-matrix

Test coverage isn't about code lines -- it's about user scenarios. Map them all.

## When to Use This Skill

- Planning test coverage for a complex feature
- Preparing for a release or milestone review
- After expanding requirements significantly
- When stakeholders ask "what's tested?"
- Transitioning from ad-hoc testing to systematic testing

## When NOT to Use This Skill

- Single-function unit testing (just write the test)
- Already have comprehensive test specifications
- Prototyping/spiking (too early for formal coverage)

## Steps

1. **Gather scenarios** from:
   - PRD / Requirements document
   - User stories / acceptance criteria
   - Bug reports (past failures = scenarios to test)
   - User feedback / support tickets
   - Edge cases discovered during development

2. **Assign stable IDs** -- Use format `[Section]-[Number]`:
   - Example: `AUTH-001`, `PAYMENT-015`, `ONBOARD-003`
   - IDs never change once assigned (even if scenario text changes)

3. **Classify testing approach**:
   - **Deterministic** (61%): Can be tested with standard assertions
   - **LLM-as-Judge** (24%): Needs qualitative assessment
   - **Simulation** (11%): Needs multi-step environment
   - **Proxy Metric** (4%): Can only be measured indirectly

4. **Build the matrix**:

| ID | Scenario | Expected Behavior | Test Approach | Status |
|----|----------|-------------------|--------------|--------|
| AUTH-001 | User logs in with valid credentials | Redirect to dashboard, session created | Deterministic | PASS |
| AUTH-002 | User enters wrong password 5 times | Account locked for 30 minutes | Deterministic | NOT_IMPL |
| TONE-001 | System responds empathetically to frustration | Response acknowledges emotion without dismissing | LLM-as-Judge | PARTIAL |

5. **Track status**: PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL / NOT_IMPLEMENTED / DEFERRED

## Output Format

### Scenario Acceptance Matrix: [Feature/Product]

**Total Scenarios**: X
**Coverage**: Y% (PASS or PARTIAL)

| Status | Count | % |
|--------|-------|---|
| PASS | X | X% |
| PARTIAL | X | X% |
| NOT_IMPLEMENTED | X | X% |
| DEFERRED | X | X% |

### By Testing Approach
| Approach | Count | Tooling Needed |
|----------|-------|---------------|
| Deterministic | X | Standard test framework |
| LLM-as-Judge | X | Evaluation framework |
| Simulation | X | Environment setup |
| Proxy Metric | X | Metrics pipeline |

### Full Matrix
[Table as above]

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.