Skip to content
Back to skills

Iteration Review

ASecurity

Performs end-of-iteration review with quality grading, metrics, and trend analysis. Use at the end of each development iteration or sprint.

  • 85 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 28, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 28, 2026

npx -y skills add ash1794/vibe-engineering --skill vibe-iteration-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Iteration Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Iteration Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ash1794-iteration-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ash1794-iteration-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: vibe-iteration-review
description: Performs end-of-iteration review with quality grading, metrics, and trend analysis. Use at the end of each development iteration or sprint.
user-invocable: true
---

# vibe-iteration-review

What gets measured gets improved. Review every iteration.

## When to Use This Skill

- End of a development sprint or iteration
- After completing a milestone
- Before starting the next iteration (retrospective)
- When the user asks "how did we do?"

## When NOT to Use This Skill

- Mid-iteration (too early, incomplete data)
- After single small tasks
- When there's no defined iteration boundary

## Steps

1. **Gather data**:
   - What was planned for this iteration?
   - What was actually delivered?
   - How many commits? Lines changed? Tests added?
   - Coverage delta? Quality metrics?
   - Known issues introduced?

2. **Grade quality** (A-F):
   - **A**: All planned work delivered, tests pass, no known issues, clean code
   - **B**: Most work delivered, minor issues, good test coverage
   - **C**: Core work delivered, some gaps, acceptable quality
   - **D**: Significant gaps, quality issues, needs rework
   - **F**: Iteration failed, major rework needed

3. **Compare to previous iterations** (if available):
   - Is quality trending up or down?
   - Is velocity improving?
   - Are known issues accumulating?

4. **Extract lessons**:
   - What went well?
   - What went poorly?
   - What to change next iteration?

## Output Format

### Iteration Review: [Iteration Name/Number]

**Quality Grade**: A/B/C/D/F
**Planned vs Delivered**: X/Y (Z%)

| Metric | This Iteration | Previous | Trend |
|--------|---------------|----------|-------|
| Commits | X | Y | ↑/↓/→ |
| Tests added | X | Y | ↑/↓/→ |
| Coverage | X% | Y% | ↑/↓/→ |
| Known issues | X | Y | ↑/↓/→ |

### Delivered
- [x] [Task 1]
- [x] [Task 2]
- [ ] [Task 3] — deferred because [reason]

### Lessons Learned
1. [What to continue]
2. [What to change]
3. [What to stop]

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.