Grad Strat Kbv

---
name: "grad-strat-kbv"
description: "Apply the Knowledge-Based View (Grant, 1996) and Nonaka and Takeuchi's SECI model to analyze how organizations create, transfer, and integrate knowledge for competitive advantage. Use this skill when the user needs to design knowledge management systems, understand why knowledge transfer fails across teams, evaluate knowledge creation processes, or when they ask 'how do we capture tacit knowledge', 'why does knowledge stay siloed', or 'how can we turn individual expertise into organizational capability'."
metadata:
  category: "WP-23 策略管理理論"
  tags: ["strategy", "knowledge-based-view", "Grant", "Nonaka", "SECI", "tacit-knowledge", "knowledge-management"]
---

# Knowledge-Based View (KBV)

## Overview

The Knowledge-Based View (Grant, 1996) positions knowledge as the most strategically significant resource of the firm. The firm exists because it integrates specialized knowledge more efficiently than markets. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) complement this with the SECI model explaining how knowledge is created through conversion between tacit and explicit forms.

## When to Use

- Designing knowledge management strategies
- Diagnosing why knowledge transfer or sharing fails
- Evaluating organizational learning and knowledge creation processes
- Assessing knowledge-based competitive advantage

## Assumptions

```
IRON LAW: Tacit knowledge cannot be directly transferred — it must
be CONVERTED. Any knowledge management strategy that assumes tacit
knowledge can be simply documented and distributed will fail.
Conversion requires interaction, practice, and socialization.
```

Key assumptions:
1. Knowledge is the primary productive resource
2. Tacit knowledge is more strategically valuable than explicit (harder to imitate)
3. The firm's role is knowledge integration, not knowledge creation by individuals
4. Different knowledge types require different transfer mechanisms

## Methodology

### Knowledge Types

| Type | Characteristics | Transfer Mechanism | Strategic Value |
|------|----------------|-------------------|-----------------|
| **Tacit** | Personal, context-specific, hard to articulate | Apprenticeship, mentoring, practice | High (hard to imitate) |
| **Explicit** | Codified, systematic, easily communicated | Documents, databases, manuals | Lower (easy to copy) |

### SECI Knowledge Creation Model (Nonaka & Takeuchi)

| Mode | From → To | Process | Example |
|------|-----------|---------|---------|
| **Socialization** | Tacit → Tacit | Shared experience, observation | Apprenticeship, job shadowing |
| **Externalization** | Tacit → Explicit | Articulation through dialogue, metaphor | Writing best practices from expert intuition |
| **Combination** | Explicit → Explicit | Systemizing and integrating codified knowledge | Database merging, report synthesis |
| **Internalization** | Explicit → Tacit | Learning by doing from codified sources | Practicing from a manual until it becomes intuitive |

### Analysis Steps

1. **Map knowledge assets** — Identify critical knowledge, classify as tacit/explicit
2. **Assess current SECI flows** — Which conversion modes are active? Which are blocked?
3. **Identify bottlenecks** — Where does knowledge conversion fail?
4. **Design Ba (enabling context)** — Physical, virtual, or mental spaces for knowledge creation
5. **Recommend interventions** — Targeted per SECI mode

### Grant's Knowledge Integration Mechanisms

- **Rules and directives** — Converting tacit to explicit rules (low knowledge integration)
- **Sequencing** — Organizing specialist inputs in temporal order
- **Routines** — Patterned interactions that integrate without articulation
- **Group problem-solving** — Highest integration, most costly

## Output Format

```markdown
## Knowledge Analysis: [Context]

### Knowledge Asset Map
| Knowledge Domain | Type (Tacit/Explicit) | Owner | Strategic Value | Transfer Risk |
|-----------------|----------------------|-------|-----------------|---------------|
| [domain]        | [type]               | [who] | [H/M/L]        | [H/M/L]      |

### SECI Assessment
| Mode | Current State | Bottleneck | Intervention |
|------|--------------|-----------|--------------|
| Socialization | [active/weak/absent] | ... | ... |
| Externalization | ... | ... | ... |
| Combination | ... | ... | ... |
| Internalization | ... | ... | ... |

### Recommendations
1. [per SECI mode or integration mechanism]
```

## Examples

### Good Example
A consulting firm losing knowledge when senior partners retire: strong combination (explicit knowledge databases) but weak socialization (junior staff lack mentoring time with partners). Recommendation: structured apprenticeship program to enable tacit-to-tacit transfer before externalization attempts.

### Bad Example
Proposing a "knowledge management database" as the sole solution for capturing expert knowledge. This addresses only the combination mode and ignores the Iron Law — tacit knowledge must first be converted through socialization or externalization before it can be stored.

## Gotchas

- Knowledge management technology (databases, wikis) addresses only explicit knowledge — necessary but insufficient
- The most valuable knowledge is often the hardest to transfer (tacit, embedded in routines)
- SECI is a spiral — knowledge creation is continuous, not a one-time project
- Ba (enabling context) matters — knowledge creation requires the right environment
- Cultural factors heavily influence willingness to share knowledge (trust, incentives)

## References

- Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. *Strategic Management Journal*, 17(S2), 109-122.
- Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). *The Knowledge-Creating Company*. Oxford University Press.
- Spender, J.C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. *Strategic Management Journal*, 17(S2), 45-62.