Skip to content
Back to skills

Algo Sc Newsvendor

ASecurity

Solve the newsvendor problem for single-period ordering decisions under uncertain demand. Use this skill when the user needs to determine optimal order quantity for perishable goods, seasonal products, or one-time purchase decisions — even if they say 'how much to order for this season', 'perishable inventory', or 'single-period ordering'.

  • 228 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added June 2, 2026
ai-agentspythongo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 5 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned June 2, 2026

npx -y skills add asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill algo-sc-newsvendor --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Algo Sc Newsvendor?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Algo Sc Newsvendor
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/asgard-ai-platform-algo-sc-newsvendor/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/asgard-ai-platform-algo-sc-newsvendor)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: "algo-sc-newsvendor"
description: "Solve the newsvendor problem for single-period ordering decisions under uncertain demand. Use this skill when the user needs to determine optimal order quantity for perishable goods, seasonal products, or one-time purchase decisions — even if they say 'how much to order for this season', 'perishable inventory', or 'single-period ordering'."
metadata:
  category: "WP-41 供應鏈演算法"
  tags: ["supply-chain", "newsvendor", "inventory", "demand-uncertainty"]
---

# Newsvendor Model

## Overview

The newsvendor model determines optimal order quantity for a single selling period with uncertain demand. Balances overage cost (Co = cost - salvage) against underage cost (Cu = price - cost). Optimal Q* satisfies: P(D ≤ Q*) = Cu / (Cu + Co). Known as the critical ratio solution.

## When to Use

**Trigger conditions:**
- One-time or seasonal purchasing decisions (fashion, holiday goods, event tickets)
- Perishable products with no restocking opportunity
- Setting initial stocking levels before demand is observed

**When NOT to use:**
- For continuous replenishment with stable demand (use EOQ)
- When backorders are acceptable and demand carries over (multi-period models)

## Algorithm

```
IRON LAW: The Critical Ratio Determines Optimal Service Level
Q* = F⁻¹(Cu / (Cu + Co)) where F⁻¹ is the inverse demand CDF.
If margin is high relative to cost (Cu >> Co), order MORE (high service level).
If margin is low relative to excess cost (Co >> Cu), order LESS (low service level).
The optimal solution almost NEVER equals expected demand.
```

### Phase 1: Input Validation
Define: unit cost (c), selling price (p), salvage value (v), demand distribution (mean μ, std σ). Compute: Cu = p - c, Co = c - v.
**Gate:** p > c > v (profitable with positive overage cost), demand distribution estimated.

### Phase 2: Core Algorithm
1. Critical ratio: CR = Cu / (Cu + Co) = (p - c) / (p - v)
2. If demand ~ Normal(μ, σ): Q* = μ + z(CR) × σ where z(CR) = inverse normal CDF at CR
3. Expected profit = Cu × E[min(Q,D)] - Co × E[max(Q-D, 0)]
4. Expected units sold = μ - σ × L(z) where L(z) is the standard loss function

### Phase 3: Verification
Check: Q* > 0, CR between 0 and 1, Q* is above or below μ depending on whether CR > or < 0.5.
**Gate:** Q* directionally correct relative to mean demand.

### Phase 4: Output
Return optimal order quantity with profit analysis.

## Output Format

```json
{
  "optimal_quantity": 130,
  "critical_ratio": 0.71,
  "expected_profit": 2800,
  "expected_leftover": 15,
  "expected_stockout_probability": 0.29,
  "metadata": {"price": 50, "cost": 20, "salvage": 5, "demand_mean": 100, "demand_std": 30}
}
```

## Examples

### Sample I/O
**Input:** p=$50, c=$20, v=$5, D~Normal(100, 30)
**Expected:** Cu=30, Co=15, CR=30/45=0.667, z=0.43, Q*=100+0.43×30=113 units.

### Edge Cases
| Input | Expected | Why |
|-------|----------|-----|
| v = 0 (total loss) | Lower Q*, conservative | High overage cost pushes order down |
| p >> c (high margin) | Q* well above mean | Worth risking excess to avoid lost sales |
| σ = 0 (certain demand) | Q* = μ exactly | No uncertainty, order exactly demand |

## Gotchas

- **Distribution choice matters**: Normal allows negative demand. For low-mean items, use Poisson or truncated normal. For high CV, use lognormal.
- **Demand estimation**: The hardest part is estimating μ and σ. Use historical data, expert judgment, or Bayesian updating from early sales signals.
- **Risk aversion**: The newsvendor model is risk-neutral. Risk-averse decision makers systematically under-order relative to Q*. Adjust for behavioral bias.
- **Multi-product constraints**: With a shared budget constraint across products, solve the constrained newsvendor (Lagrangian relaxation).
- **Salvage value assumption**: Assumes all excess can be salvaged at v. If disposal has a cost (v < 0), the model still works but Q* drops further.

## Scripts

| Script | Description | Usage |
|--------|-------------|-------|
| `scripts/newsvendor.py` | Compute newsvendor optimal quantity, expected profit, and fill rate | `python scripts/newsvendor.py --help` |

Run `python scripts/newsvendor.py --verify` to execute built-in sanity tests.

## References

- For multi-product constrained newsvendor, see `references/constrained-newsvendor.md`
- For demand distribution fitting, see `references/demand-fitting.md`

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB
  • examples/sample_input.json287 B
  • references/constrained-newsvendor.md10.7 KB
  • references/demand-fitting.md8.9 KB
  • scripts/newsvendor.py5.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.