Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Principle Test Behavior Not Implementation

ASecurity

Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Call the code the way its users do and assert the observable result or contract. Check whether a relevant defect makes the test fail. Keep useful negative-path and relational contract tests.

6 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 10/1/2026
ai-agentstestingrefactoring

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 10/1/2026

$npx -y skills add arjitj2/open-pstack --skill principle-test-behavior-not-implementation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Principle Test Behavior Not Implementation?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Principle Test Behavior Not Implementation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/arjitj2-principle-test-behavior-not-implementation/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/arjitj2-principle-test-behavior-not-implementation)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
description: "Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Call the code the way its users do and assert the observable result or contract. Check whether a relevant defect makes the test fail. Keep useful negative-path and relational contract tests."
user-invocable: false
---

# Test Behavior, Not Implementation

A test calls the code the way its users do and asserts the result or contract they observe. An assertion about internal calls or a copied constant can miss that behavior.

The check: before you keep a test, introduce a relevant defect and check that the test fails. Returning `undefined` can be a useful probe when a defined result is required. It does not invalidate a negative-path test whose correct result is absence or a relational contract check.

**Why:** A test that cannot fail for a defect costs CI time and review attention and catches nothing. A constant pin can obstruct harmless edits when the pinned value is not part of the contract.

**Five shapes that can miss the relevant behavior:**

- **Weak or no assertion.** No `expect`, or an assertion that checks too little of the contract. `toBeDefined`, `toBeTruthy`, `toBeInstanceOf`, and `toBeGreaterThan(0)` fail on `undefined`, but can accept a wrong defined result.
- **Mock or absence only.** Only checking that a mock was called can miss a wrong payload. Absence assertions such as `not.toThrow`, `not.toHaveBeenCalled`, `toBeUndefined`, `toEqual([])`, or `toHaveLength(0)` are useful when absence is the required behavior. Check that an incorrect presence or side effect fails the test.
- **Self-referential.** An expected value computed by the same faulty path can hide a defect: `expect(f(a)).toBe(f(a))`. Comparing two implementations can still test a required relation if the comparison detects relevant disagreement.
- **Constant pin.** Restating an incidental constant can block refactoring without testing behavior: `expect(LIMITS.maxTools).toBe(8)`. Keep prompt, configuration, and table checks that enforce a real contract.
- **Fixture asserts fixture.** The assertion reads data the test built, and the subject never runs. A subject called in `beforeEach` can still be tested if the assertion observes its result.

**The fix:** call the subject inside the test body with one concrete input and assert the literal output or the observable effect, `expect(slugify("Hello, World!")).toBe("hello-world")`. For an absence, exercise the negative path and prove that an incorrect presence or side effect fails. A separate positive-path test can provide contrast. For an incidental constant, test the mechanism that reads it. For a mock, assert the payload or observable state when those are the contract. Rewrite or delete a test only when it checks no relevant behavior or contract.

**Keep** a test of a relation across a table's rows (a key present in two tables, a parent that exists), and a compile-time check in a `*.test-d.ts` file.

Attribution

arjitj2arjitj2
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from arjitj2 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →