Writes technical documentation for this repository: a README, a wiki page, product documentation, API docs or a technical post. Applies the framework's single writing standard (`.agents/skills/ai-report/references/documentation-writer.md`, spec 039) and verifies every document against the tree. Trigger for "write the README", "update the wiki", "document this API", "write a technical post about", "refresh the docs". Not for the changelog — use /ai-ship. Not for a spec or an ADR — use /ai-spec...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add arcasilesgroup/ai-engineering --skill ai-write --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ai Write?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/arcasilesgroup-ai-write)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ai-write
description: >-
Writes technical documentation for this repository: a README, a wiki page, product
documentation, API docs or a technical post. Applies the framework's single writing
standard (`.agents/skills/ai-report/references/documentation-writer.md`, spec 039) and verifies every document
against the tree. Trigger for "write the README", "update the wiki", "document this
API", "write a technical post about", "refresh the docs". Not for the changelog — use
/ai-ship. Not for a spec or an ADR — use /ai-spec. Not for a finding — use /ai-note.
Not for an issue — use /ai-report.
license: Apache-2.0
compatibility: needs git; needs the writing standard reference
---
# Write documentation with the framework's gates
## What it produces
One document — a README, a wiki page, product documentation, API docs or a technical post —
written against the framework's single standard and verified against the tree: every named
file `exists`, nothing restates what the environment already says, and each section ends on
a checkable completion criterion. A document that cannot be verified exits `not-covered: <reason>`.
## Steps
1. Read the writing standard (spec 039): `.agents/skills/ai-report/references/documentation-writer.md` beside
`ai-report`. If it is missing, stop and say `INCOMPLETE: writing standard absent`.
2. Read the tree the document is about. Not from memory, not `--help`. The README names
commands that exist. The API doc names endpoints in the code. The wiki names
directories on disk. Every claim traces to a file or a command.
3. Write and keep it a document, not a cache. Never restate the environment (config, CLI
output, directory layout). Never repeat the spec or the ADR it points at. One idea per
sentence. One meaning per word. Every section ends on a checkable criterion ("the
command in section 2 runs", never "the reader understands").
4. Verify before done. Walk every named file and command. A missing file or a command that
does not run is a finding against the document. A passage that could not be verified
exits `not-covered: <reason>`. Never invent to make a section pass.
5. Write only into the homes the user named (README.md, docs/, a wiki dir). The change
lands through the normal review. This skill never approves its own document.
## What this is not
Not the changelog (that is `/ai-ship`, which owns commits and the changelog entry); not a
spec or ADR (`/ai-spec` + `ai-eng decide`); not a finding (`/ai-note`); not an issue or a
report (`/ai-report`). And it is not a licence to repeat the environment: a document that
restates `--help` or the config is a cache, and a cache earns its load only when the lookup
is expensive.
- "The reader will understand it from context" — a completion criterion is not a feeling:
if a section cannot be checked against a file or a command, it gets a `not-covered`
reason, and a doc that claims to be verified when it is not is the false-green this
framework exists to stop.
## Done when
Every named file exists and every named command runs, no passage restates the environment,
every section ends on a checkable criterion, anything unverifiable carries a `not-covered:
<reason>` exit, and the user's named home was the only place written. The doc is a claim;
the tree is the evidence.Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!