Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: \"Is it safe to change X?\", \"What depends on this?\", \"What will break?\"
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Apra-Labs/apra-fleet --skill gitnexus-impact-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gitnexus Impact Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/apra-labs-gitnexus-impact-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gitnexus-impact-analysis
description: "Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: \"Is it safe to change X?\", \"What depends on this?\", \"What will break?\""
---
# Impact Analysis with GitNexus
## When to Use
- "Is it safe to change this function?"
- "What will break if I modify X?"
- "Show me the blast radius"
- "Who uses this code?"
- Before making non-trivial code changes
- Before committing -- to understand what your changes affect
## Workflow
```
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) -> What depends on this
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes -> Check affected execution flows
3. detect_changes() -> Map current git changes to affected flows
4. Assess risk and report to user
```
> If "Index is stale" -> run `node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze` in terminal.
## Checklist
```
- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) to find dependents
- [ ] Review d=1 items first (these WILL BREAK)
- [ ] Check high-confidence (>0.8) dependencies
- [ ] READ processes to check affected execution flows
- [ ] detect_changes() for pre-commit check
- [ ] Assess risk level and report to user
```
## Understanding Output
| Depth | Risk Level | Meaning |
| ----- | ---------------- | ------------------------ |
| d=1 | **WILL BREAK** | Direct callers/importers |
| d=2 | LIKELY AFFECTED | Indirect dependencies |
| d=3 | MAY NEED TESTING | Transitive effects |
## Risk Assessment
| Affected | Risk |
| ------------------------------ | -------- |
| <5 symbols, few processes | LOW |
| 5-15 symbols, 2-5 processes | MEDIUM |
| >15 symbols or many processes | HIGH |
| Critical path (auth, payments) | CRITICAL |
## Tools
**impact** -- the primary tool for symbol blast radius:
```
impact({
target: "validateUser",
direction: "upstream",
minConfidence: 0.8,
maxDepth: 3
})
-> d=1 (WILL BREAK):
- loginHandler (src/auth/login.ts:42) [CALLS, 100%]
- apiMiddleware (src/api/middleware.ts:15) [CALLS, 100%]
-> d=2 (LIKELY AFFECTED):
- authRouter (src/routes/auth.ts:22) [CALLS, 95%]
```
**detect_changes** -- git-diff based impact analysis:
```
detect_changes({scope: "staged"})
-> Changed: 5 symbols in 3 files
-> Affected: LoginFlow, TokenRefresh, APIMiddlewarePipeline
-> Risk: MEDIUM
```
## Example: "What breaks if I change validateUser?"
```
1. impact({target: "validateUser", direction: "upstream"})
-> d=1: loginHandler, apiMiddleware (WILL BREAK)
-> d=2: authRouter, sessionManager (LIKELY AFFECTED)
2. READ gitnexus://repo/my-app/processes
-> LoginFlow and TokenRefresh touch validateUser
3. Risk: 2 direct callers, 2 processes = MEDIUM
```

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!