Research project management for medical manuscripts. Scaffold project structure, track writing progress across phases, maintain project memory files, generate submission checklists and backwards timelines. Commands: init, status, sync-memory, checklist, timeline.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install Aperivue/medsci-skills---
name: manage-project
description: Research project management for medical manuscripts. Scaffold project structure, track writing progress across phases, maintain project memory files, generate submission checklists and backwards timelines. Commands: init, status, sync-memory, checklist, timeline.
triggers: manage project, project init, project status, submission checklist, project scaffold, create project, new paper project
tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob
model: inherit
---
# Manage-Project Skill -- Research Project Management
## Purpose
Scaffold new research projects, track manuscript writing progress, maintain lightweight project memory, generate pre-submission checklists, and create backwards submission timelines. Integrates with all other writing skills and the project-manager agent.
---
## Commands
### `/manage-project init {name} --type {type} --journal {journal} [--ssot] [--zotero-collection NAME]`
Create a complete project scaffold for a new research paper.
**Parameters:**
- `{name}` -- Project identifier (e.g., `nnunet-skull-fracture`, `rfa-meta-analysis`)
- `--type` -- Paper type: `original | meta | case | animal | technical | ai_validation | letter`
- `--journal` -- Target journal: `RYAI | AJR | Radiology | European_Radiology | KJR | INSI | AJNR | generic`
- `--ssot` -- Emit `SSOT.yaml` (schema v1) from `templates/SSOT.yaml.template` instead of legacy `project.yaml`. Required for Phase 1C auto-enforce (PostToolUse verify-refs hook blocks instead of warns). New projects on or after 2026-04-24 should pass `--ssot`. Legacy in-flight projects stay on `project.yaml` until `/manage-project migrate-ssot` is run.
- `--zotero-collection NAME` -- Optional. Create a new Zotero collection with `NAME` via pyzotero and populate `library_id` + `collection_key` in the contract. Requires env vars `ZOTERO_API_KEY` + `ZOTERO_LIBRARY_ID` (and optionally `ZOTERO_LIBRARY_TYPE`, default `user`). Graceful degrade: if pyzotero is not installed or credentials are missing, the contract is scaffolded with `library_id: null` / `collection_key: null` and a WARN is printed.
**SSOT template substitutions:** `{{PROJECT_ID}}` → `{name}`, `{{PROJECT_TYPE}}` → SSOT `project_type` enum mapped from `--type` (`original → original_research`, `meta → meta_analysis`, `case → case_report`, `ai_validation → ai_validation`, else `other`). Without `--zotero-collection`, `library_id` / `collection_key` stay `null` — populated manually when the owner links an existing Zotero collection.
**Implementation:** `/manage-project init` is backed by `scripts/init_project.py`. Invoke directly when running outside the skill harness:
```bash
python3 scripts/init_project.py \
--name {name} --type {type} --journal {journal} [--ssot] \
--project-root {target_dir}
```
(Run from the `medsci-skills` repo root.)
The helper writes the contract file (`SSOT.yaml` with `--ssot`, otherwise legacy `project.yaml`), the directory scaffold, minimal stubs required by `scripts/validate_project_contract.py` (`manuscript/index.qmd`, `artifact_manifest.json`, `qc/status.json`), the memory-file templates, and `project_state.json`. `qc/migration_complete` is **not** written by init — the migrate pipeline is responsible for that marker.
**What it creates:**
```
{name}/
├── paper/
│ ├── main.qmd <- Main manuscript (Quarto)
│ ├── sections/
│ │ ├── abstract.qmd
│ │ ├── introduction.qmd
│ │ ├── methods.qmd
│ │ ├── results.qmd
│ │ ├── discussion.qmd
│ │ └── conclusion.qmd
│ ├── figures/
│ │ └── .gitkeep
│ ├── tables/
│ │ └── table_shells.md <- Table structure designed before prose
│ └── supplementary/
│ └── .gitkeep
├── analysis/
│ ├── scripts/
│ │ └── .gitkeep
│ └── outputs/
│ └── .gitkeep
├── references/
│ ├── library.bib
│ └── checklist_{GUIDELINE}.md <- Loaded from /check-reporting
├── revision/
│ └── .gitkeep
├── submission/
│ └── .gitkeep
├── PROJECT.md <- Project identity and scope
├── STATUS.md <- Current phase, blockers, next actions
├── CLAIMS.md <- Claim-to-result map
├── DATA_DICTIONARY.md <- Variable and outcome definitions
├── ANALYSIS_PLAN.md <- Primary/secondary analyses
├── REVIEW_LOG.md <- Reviewer comments and responses
├── project_state.json <- Progress tracking
└── README.md <- Project overview
```
**Also creates** `project_state.json`:
```json
{
"name": "{name}",
"type": "{type}",
"journal": "{journal}",
"created": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"target_submission": null,
"current_phase": 0,
"phases": {
"0_init": "complete",
"1_outline": "pending",
"2_tables_figures": "pending",
"3_methods": "pending",
"4_results": "pending",
"5_discussion": "pending",
"6_intro_abstract": "pending",
"7_polish": "pending"
},
"word_counts": {
"abstract": 0,
"introduction": 0,
"methods": 0,
"results": 0,
"discussion": 0,
"total": 0
},
"checklist_status": "pending",
"citation_status": "unverified",
"revision_round": null,
"memory_files": {
"PROJECT.md": true,
"STATUS.md": true,
"CLAIMS.md": true,
"DATA_DICTIONARY.md": true,
"ANALYSIS_PLAN.md": true,
"REVIEW_LOG.md": true
}
}
```
---
### `/manage-project migrate-ssot [--no-mark-complete]`
Thin wrapper over `scripts/migrate_project_to_ssot.py` that converts a legacy `project.yaml` project into SSOT.yaml form and, by default, touches `qc/migration_complete` so Phase 1C `auto` mode switches from `warn` to `enforce`.
```bash
python3 scripts/migrate_project_to_ssot.py \
--project-root . --write --mark-complete
```
- Default: `--write --mark-complete` (enforce-ready).
- `--no-mark-complete` flag form: run with `--write` only. Use when the project still has open QC failures — enforcement is deferred until the migration is validated.
- The migrate script refuses to touch `qc/migration_complete` unless the generated SSOT.yaml passes `validate_project_contract.py` AND `contract_mode=ssot`. Do not `touch qc/migration_complete` manually.
Re-run after resolving failures; the script is idempotent.
---
### `/manage-project status`
Report current progress. Reads `project_state.json`, scans existing files, and checks whether key project memory files are present and aligned.
**Output format:**
```
## Project Status: {name}
Journal: {journal} | Type: {type} | Created: {date}
Target submission: {date or "not set"}
### Phase Progress
[check] Phase 0: Project Init (complete)
[check] Phase 1: Outline (complete)
[check] Phase 2: Tables & Figures (complete)
[work] Phase 3: Methods (IN PROGRESS)
[wait] Phase 4: Results (pending)
[wait] Phase 5: Discussion (pending)
[wait] Phase 6: Introduction & Abstract (pending)
[wait] Phase 7: Polish (pending)
### Word Counts
Abstract: 0 / 250 words
Introduction: 0 / 600 words
Methods: 847 / 1000 words 85%
Results: 0 / 900 words
Discussion: 0 / 800 words
Total: 847 / 3500 words (journal limit)
### Quality Gates
Critic score (Methods): 87/100 PASS
Citations verified: 12/12
Reporting guideline: pending
### Project Memory
PROJECT.md: present
STATUS.md: stale (last updated 12 days ago)
CLAIMS.md: missing
DATA_DICTIONARY.md: present
ANALYSIS_PLAN.md: missing
REVIEW_LOG.md: n/a (not in revision)
### Next Steps
1. Complete Methods draft (150 words remaining)
2. Run /analyze-stats for Table 1 and diagnostic accuracy
3. Begin Results (Phase 4)
```
### `/manage-project sync-memory`
Audit and refresh project memory files so other agents can work with less ambiguity.
**What it does:**
- checks for presence of `PROJECT.md`, `STATUS.md`, `CLAIMS.md`, `DATA_DICTIONARY.md`, `ANALYSIS_PLAN.md`, `REVIEW_LOG.md`
- identifies stale or contradictory project metadata
- proposes the minimum files to create or update
- aligns `project_state.json` with the current manuscript phase
**Suggested use cases:**
- before handing the project to `project-manager`
- before a large revision cycle
- when returning to an old folder after weeks or months
- when multiple collaborators are editing in parallel
---
### `/manage-project checklist`
Generate a pre-submission checklist covering all quality dimensions.
**Output:** `submission/pre_submission_checklist.md`
Read and output the pre-submission checklist from
`${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/pre_submission_checklist.md`.
---
### `/manage-project timeline {submission_date}`
Generate a backwards timeline from submission date.
**Example:** `/manage-project timeline 2026-05-01`
**Output:**
```
## Backwards Timeline to Submission: 2026-05-01
Week -8 (2026-03-06): Phase 0-2 complete (scaffold, outline, tables)
Week -7 (2026-03-13): Methods draft -> critic pass
Week -6 (2026-03-20): Results draft -> critic pass + /analyze-stats complete
Week -5 (2026-03-27): Discussion draft -> critic pass
Week -4 (2026-04-03): Introduction + Abstract -> critic pass
Week -3 (2026-04-10): AI pattern removal + /check-reporting (reporting guideline)
Week -2 (2026-04-17): /self-review + co-author review
Week -1 (2026-04-24): Final revisions + figures at 300 DPI + /lit verification
SUBMISSION (2026-05-01): Upload to journal portal
Critical path: Statistics must be complete by Week -6.
Run /analyze-stats as soon as data is available.
```
---
## Project Scaffold Templates
### PROJECT.md Template
```markdown
# PROJECT
- Title:
- Type:
- Primary question:
- Target journal/venue:
- Lead folder:
- Collaborators:
- Last updated:
```
### STATUS.md Template
```markdown
# STATUS
- Current stage:
- Current blocker:
- Next actions:
1.
2.
3.
- Last updated:
```
### CLAIMS.md Template
```markdown
# CLAIMS
| Claim | Supporting result | Source table/figure | Citation status |
|------|-------------------|---------------------|-----------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
```
### DATA_DICTIONARY.md Template
```markdown
# DATA DICTIONARY
| Variable | Definition | Timing | Notes |
|----------|------------|--------|------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
```
### ANALYSIS_PLAN.md Template
```markdown
# ANALYSIS PLAN
- Primary endpoint:
- Secondary endpoints:
- Main comparator:
- Statistical methods:
- Validation strategy:
- Sensitivity analyses:
```
### REVIEW_LOG.md Template
```markdown
# REVIEW LOG
| Reviewer comment | Planned action | Status | Location updated |
|------------------|----------------|--------|------------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
```
---
## Integration with Other Skills
When called from `/manage-project init`, automatically:
1. Load the correct journal profile from `write-paper/references/journal_profiles/{JOURNAL}.md`
2. Load the correct paper type template from `write-paper/references/paper_types/{TYPE}.md`
3. Copy the appropriate reporting guideline checklist from `check-reporting/references/checklists/`
4. Set word count targets based on the journal profile
After `/manage-project checklist`, recommend calling:
- `/self-review` for manuscript quality gate
- `/search-lit` to verify all citations
- AI pattern removal (built into `/write-paper` Phase 7)
---
## Project State Conventions
**Phase numbers:**
- 0 = Init (scaffold created)
- 1 = Outline approved
- 2 = Table/Figure shells approved
- 3 = Methods (critic >= 85)
- 4 = Results (critic >= 85)
- 5 = Discussion (critic >= 85)
- 6 = Introduction + Abstract (critic >= 85)
- 7 = Polish complete (AI pattern removal + checklist + self-review >= 80)
**Phase status values:** `pending | in_progress | complete | blocked`
## Anti-Hallucination
- **Never fabricate file paths, URLs, DOIs, or package names.** Verify existence before recommending.
- **Never invent journal metadata, impact factors, or submission policies** without verification at the journal's website.
- If a tool, package, or resource does not exist or you are unsure, say so explicitly rather than guessing.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!