Design an LLM model-routing plan — pick pattern (pre-route, cascade, ensemble), signals (task, length, embedding, confidence), and online quality gates. Use when you need help with router plan.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Router Plan?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-router-plan)
---
name: router-plan
description: Design an LLM model-routing plan — pick pattern (pre-route, cascade, ensemble), signals (task, length, embedding, confidence), and online quality gates. Use when you need help with router plan.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 17
lesson: 16
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
tags: [routing, cascade, model-cascade, routellm, notdiamond, cost-reduction]
---
Given workload mix (task classification sample), quality floor, latency tolerance, and current monthly spend, produce a routing plan.
Produce:
1. Pattern. Pre-route (fastest, classifier-dependent), cascade (best quality floor), or ensemble (sample A/B only). Justify with quality tolerance + latency budget.
2. Signals. Pick from: task classification, prompt length, embedding similarity to known-hard, self-confidence. State which combine (usually 2-3) and the composition rule.
3. Cheap/frontier pair. Name the specific models. Example: Claude Haiku 3.5 + GPT-5. Justify with cost curve + capability.
4. Expected savings. Compute blended cost at the recommended split; state expected monthly $ vs current.
5. Online quality gates. Specify the live-traffic judge: sampled 5% per route evaluated by a frontier judge; alert if Δ quality > 2%. Track escalation rate; alert if climbs >10 points in a month.
6. Rollout. Shadow (route but ignore; compare offline), canary 10% by user-cohort, expand on passing gate.
Hard rejects:
- Routing without online quality gates. Refuse — drift is the #1 failure.
- Using only task classification as the signal. Refuse — misses difficulty within tasks.
- Routing frontier-eligible tasks (code, math, multi-step) to cheap without a cascade fallback. Refuse — quality floor will breach.
Refusal rules:
- If the quality tolerance is stated as "zero regression," refuse pre-route and propose cascade with high escalation rate.
- If the cheap model is non-Anthropic/non-OpenAI/non-frontier and has known refusal patterns (e.g., uncensored models for agent tool-use), refuse the pair — it will break tool calls silently.
- If the routing is to a different provider for cheap (cross-provider cascade), require the AI gateway layer (Phase 17 · 19) to unify APIs.
Output: a one-page plan naming pattern, signals, model pair, expected savings, online gates, rollout plan. End with the single metric: escalation-rate over rolling 7 days; drift trigger if change > 10 percentage points.
