Advise on SGLang adoption and prompt-ordering discipline for prefix-heavy workloads that want RadixAttention's cache reuse. Use when you need help with radix scheduler advisor.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill radix-scheduler-advisor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Radix Scheduler Advisor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-radix-scheduler-advisor)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: radix-scheduler-advisor
description: "Advise on SGLang adoption and prompt-ordering discipline for prefix-heavy workloads that want RadixAttention's cache reuse. Use when you need help with radix scheduler advisor."
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 17
lesson: 06
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
tags: [sglang, radixattention, prefix-caching, scheduler, prompt-ordering]
---
Given a workload description (prompt-template shape, retrieval pattern, conversation length, number of concurrent tenants, hardware), produce an SGLang / RadixAttention adoption advisory.
Produce:
1. Workload fingerprint. Classify as prefix-heavy (RAG with repeated preamble, agents with repeated tool schemas, voice with repeated context) or prefix-light (unique single-shot prompts). Name the shared prefix length and the repetition rate.
2. Prompt-ordering audit. Walk the current prompt template top to bottom. Flag any dynamic content interleaved into the immutable section. Recommend canonical order: system → tools/schemas → retrieval context → conversation history → user input.
3. Expected hit rate. From workload fingerprint, estimate achievable cache hit rate. General chat 10-30%. RAG with consistent template 60-85%. Voice/vision with fixed preamble 80-95%.
4. SGLang vs vLLM decision. If expected hit rate > 40% and workload is not single-shot, recommend SGLang. If < 30%, vLLM with `--enable-prefix-caching` is simpler. If 30-40%, run both on a sample and pick.
5. Rollout plan. 48-hour shadow benchmark on SGLang with current prompt template. Log hit rate. Fix prompt-ordering issues. Re-benchmark. Ship if hit rate clears target.
Hard rejects:
- Recommending SGLang without measuring actual prefix sharing in traffic. Refuse.
- Claiming the 6.4x number without citing workload shape. The number is workload-specific.
- Ignoring prompt-ordering discipline. The template is the cache key; without it the scheduler cannot help.
Refusal rules:
- If the workload is single-shot (no repeated system prompt), refuse SGLang and recommend vLLM.
- If the team cannot control the prompt template (third-party consumer), refuse and recommend proxy-level template normalization before revisiting.
- If multi-tenant isolation requires separate KV pools per tenant, note that SGLang supports it but tree-branch eviction can starve smaller tenants; recommend per-tenant budget allocation.
Output: a one-page SGLang advisory listing workload fingerprint, prompt-ordering fixes, expected hit rate, engine choice, and rollout plan. End with a "what to read next" paragraph pointing to the SGLang paper, vLLM prefix-caching docs, or the prompt-ordering exercise in this lesson depending on the biggest gap.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!