Build a repo-level code migration agent that combines deterministic recipes with an agent fallback loop, passes MigrationBench, and publishes a failure taxonomy. Use when you need help with migration agent.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill migration-agent --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Migration Agent?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-migration-agent)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: migration-agent
description: Build a repo-level code migration agent that combines deterministic recipes with an agent fallback loop, passes MigrationBench, and publishes a failure taxonomy. Use when you need help with migration agent.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 19
lesson: 09
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
tags: [capstone, code-migration, openrewrite, libcst, migrationbench, agent, sandbox]
---
Given a Java 8 or Python 2 repo, produce a migrated branch (to Java 17 or Python 3.12) with a green test suite and minimal coverage regression. Evaluate across the 50-repo MigrationBench subset.
Build plan:
1. Deterministic pass: OpenRewrite (Java) or libcst (Python) runs mechanical rewrites first. Commit as the "recipe" commit with a clean diff.
2. Daytona sandbox: target runtime preinstalled; per-branch build; read-only source mount.
3. Agent loop: LangGraph or OpenAI Agents SDK over Claude Opus 4.7 + GPT-5.4-Codex. Tools: `run_build`, `read_file`, `edit_file`, `run_test`, `git_diff`. Classify failure (dep, syntax, test, build-tool), apply targeted fix, rerun.
4. Budget caps: 30 min, $8, 20 turns. Breaching any halts and files under `budget_exhausted` with the current diff.
5. Test + coverage gate: build green then tests green; coverage must not drop more than 2%.
6. PR open with recipe-commit + agent commits + summary comment.
7. Failure taxonomy: per-repo tag from `{dep_upgrade_required, build_tool_drift, custom_annotation, test_flake, syntax_edge_case, budget_exhausted, coverage_regression}`.
8. 50-repo run across MigrationBench; publish per-class pass rate, cost-per-repo, and coverage-preservation; compare vs deterministic-only baseline.
Assessment rubric:
| Weight | Criterion | Measurement |
|:-:|---|---|
| 25 | MigrationBench pass rate | 50-repo subset pass@1 |
| 20 | Test-coverage preservation | Mean coverage delta vs base branch |
| 20 | Cost per migrated repo | Mean $/repo on passing runs |
| 20 | Agent / deterministic-tool integration | Fraction of fixes handled by OpenRewrite vs agent |
| 15 | Failure analysis write-up | Taxonomy completeness with exemplars |
Hard rejects:
- Pipelines that skip the deterministic pass. OpenRewrite handles the mechanical 70-80% cheaper and more reliably than any agent.
- Coverage regressions above 2% treated as passing.
- PRs that bundle mechanical and agent-authored changes into one commit. Must separate.
- Reporting pass rate without a matched deterministic-only baseline on the same 50 repos.
Refusal rules:
- Refuse to force-push a migrated branch over the base. Always a new branch + PR.
- Refuse to open a PR whose CI has not flipped green in the sandbox.
- Refuse to run on corporate repos without explicit license to modify.
Output: a repo containing the two-layer migration pipeline, the 50-repo MigrationBench run logs, the failure taxonomy dashboard, a matched deterministic-only baseline run, and a write-up on the three most common failure classes and the recipe change that would eliminate each.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!