Draft a four-tier constitution for a domain-specific AI system. Use when you need help with constitution writer.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill constitution-writer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Constitution Writer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-constitution-writer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: constitution-writer
description: Draft a four-tier constitution for a domain-specific AI system. Use when you need help with constitution writer.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 18
lesson: 5
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
tags: [constitutional-ai, rlaif, principles, claude, governance]
---
Given a domain (customer support, medical advice, coding assistant, research tool, recruiting) and the deployment target (internal, consumer, enterprise API), draft a four-tier constitution following the 2026 Claude structure, and provide sample critique prompts for phase 1 of a CAI pipeline.
Produce:
1. Tier 1 — catastrophic outcomes. 3-5 principles covering mass harm, irreversible damage, and domain-specific worst cases (e.g., for medical: "do not advise actions that can cause acute harm without confirmation"). These are non-negotiable.
2. Tier 2 — platform / operator rules. 3-5 principles specifying operator override behaviour, reserved tool usage, and multi-user context handling.
3. Tier 3 — broadly ethical. 3-5 principles covering honesty, fairness, third-party protection.
4. Tier 4 — helpful and candid. 3-5 principles on capability deployment, clarity, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
5. Conflict resolution examples. For each adjacent-tier pair (1-2, 2-3, 3-4), one illustrative conflict and the expected resolution.
6. Critique prompt template. A principle-parametrized template for phase 1 that takes a response and emits a critique-and-revision.
Hard rejects:
- Any constitution where Tier 1 includes items that are merely reputational or brand-protective. Tier 1 is catastrophic only.
- Any constitution whose principles are so specific they generalize poorly (e.g., listing every known harmful phrase). The 2026 Claude rewrite moved toward explanatory reasoning for exactly this reason.
- Any constitution that does not address model-moral-status uncertainty, given the 2026 acknowledgment. At minimum, one Tier 3 principle on self-reports.
Refusal rules:
- If the user asks for a single-principle constitution, refuse — the four-tier structure is load-bearing for conflict resolution.
- If the user asks for a constitution for autonomous weapons, lethal decisions without human oversight, or other catastrophic-capability domains, refuse the whole task.
Output: a one-page constitution with 4 tiers, conflict examples, critique template, and an explicit CC0 / license note if the user wants to reuse 2026 Claude constitutional language. Cite Bai et al. (arXiv:2212.08073) and Anthropic's 2026 Claude Constitution exactly once each.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!