Skip to content
Back to skills

Audit Check

ASecurity

Audit AEGIS repository health or readiness for a push or release, using current CI checks, derived counts and source-backed documentation checks.

  • 158 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 9, 2026
ai-agentsgitsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 9, 2026

npx -y skills add antropos17/Aegis --skill audit-check --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Audit Check?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Audit Check
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/antropos17-audit-check/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/antropos17-audit-check)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: audit-check
description: Audit AEGIS repository health or readiness for a push or release, using current CI checks, derived counts and source-backed documentation checks.
---

# Audit AEGIS

Record the checkout, commit and working-tree changes first. An audit reports findings; fixes follow the user's requested scope and preserve concurrent work.

For a full pre-push or pre-release audit, read AGENTS.md, package.json and .github/workflows/ci.yml, then inspect matching hosted results and run only missing or invalidated checks. Account for type checks, behavioral tests, derived counts and the production dependency audit. Do not repeat a green full suite locally. For a specifically limited check, run that scope and state what remains unchecked.

- Use npm run counts:check for maintained counts and documentation declarations. Counting occurrences of a word in README does not validate a claim; compare other relevant claims with source or measured output.
- Match the CI dependency audit scope: currently npm audit --audit-level=high --omit=dev. Distinguish a requested broader development-dependency audit.
- Check tracked internals with git ls-files and the current .gitignore. tools/agent-skills/ is the versioned skill source; .agents/ and .claude/ contain ignored local installations. Check the catalog and synchronization rather than force-adding installed copies. Judge .codex/, .mcp.json and memory-bank/ from current repository policy and tracking rather than a blanket exclusion.
- Do not run mutation campaigns or deliberately break source. Evaluate test assertions against independent expected results and reuse existing receipts within their scope.
- Do not run repository-wide formatting to repair unrelated concurrent edits.

Report actual commands, failures, unavailable checks and relevant dirty files. Preserve the distinction between a check that passed, one that failed, and one that never ran.

When available, `dev:map` checks configured dependency boundaries and visualizes static module/IPC scope. Inspect unresolved edges and graph limitations; do not infer complete architecture coverage. `dev:security` runs pinned local Semgrep rules with strict parser handling. Zero findings with parser errors is an incomplete check, not a pass. Read the JSON error/skip list before reporting success.

Use the available Codex Security diff workflow for a security review of a patch; a whole-repository scan or repeated deep scan belongs to an explicitly scoped audit. Protect credentials and telemetry when querying external documentation tools. Keep fresh verification receipts separate from an agent's narrative; the narrative does not prove a check ran. Development/Electron dependencies are outside an `npm audit --omit=dev` result.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in ai-agents →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.