UI/UX design phase — propose an intentional design system (pattern, brand, color, typography, spacing, atomic components) with the user, offering distinct directions and per-page layout options, for any interface type: Web, Mobile, Desktop, TUI, or CLI. Use when the SRS declares a user interface, when defining a design system or visual identity, choosing layouts, or reviewing UI work against UX laws.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add AnmarHani/SwarmVault --skill swarm-design-ui --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Swarm Design Ui?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anmarhani-swarm-design-ui)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: swarm-design-ui
description: UI/UX design phase — propose an intentional design system (pattern, brand, color, typography, spacing, atomic components) with the user, offering distinct directions and per-page layout options, for any interface type: Web, Mobile, Desktop, TUI, or CLI. Use when the SRS declares a user interface, when defining a design system or visual identity, choosing layouts, or reviewing UI work against UX laws.
---
# swarm-design-ui — UI/UX design phase
**Gate:** validated SRS declaring a user interface. Runs alongside swarm-design.
The goal is intentional, consistent design decided *with* the user — not templated defaults.
**Load only what you need** (token economy): the per-interface reference for the type at hand
(`references/web.md`, `references/mobile.md`, `references/desktop.md`, `references/tui-cli.md`),
and — for graphical UIs — `references/style-menu.md`, the on-demand catalog of product
categories, style families, layout patterns, and design resources (checklist.design, UX laws,
color/type/psychology tools).
## 1. Interview first
Audience and context of use; brand personality; platform conventions to honor; accessibility
requirements; existing brand assets. Keep it light and options-first — the point is to
understand the product, not to quiz.
## 2. Propose a design system (offer ≥2 directions)
Don't jump to one look. Using the product's category and personality (see
`references/style-menu.md` for the vocabulary), synthesize a **recommended design system** and
at least **one distinct alternative** — e.g. "clinical precision" vs "warm craft" — so the user
chooses with something concrete in front of them. Present each as a compact panel:
```
DESIGN SYSTEM — <recommended | alternative>
Pattern/layout : <e.g. Hero-centric + social proof> why: <conversion/trust rationale>
Style : <e.g. Soft UI evolution> best for: <fit>
Colors : primary / surface / accent / semantic / bg / text (WCAG-AA checked)
Typography : <display / body pairing> mood: <…>
Effects : <shadows, motion timing, hover>
Avoid : <anti-patterns for this domain — see style-menu>
```
The style/category menu is a **guide, not a cage**: if the product's needs point elsewhere,
design for them. Resolve the picked direction into the tokens below.
## 3. Produce the design-system doc (`docs/design-ui.md`)
Everything as **tokens and scales**, never per-screen ad-hoc values:
1. **Color** — palette with roles (background/surface/primary/accent/semantic), light +
dark, WCAG-AA contrast checked.
2. **Typography** — 1–2 families, a modular size scale, line-height and weight rules.
3. **Spacing & box model** — one spacing scale (e.g. 4px base), consistent
margin/border/padding discipline, grid + auto-layout container rules.
4. **Atomic inventory** — atoms → components → templates → pages; every screen implied by
an FR appears here, traced to its FR-ID. Use the *correct component names*
([namethatui.com](https://namethatui.com) is the dictionary): "drawer", "segmented
control", "combobox" — not "that sliding panel". Precise names in specs and tickets mean
every agent builds the same thing; resolve vague descriptions to the proper name and confirm.
5. **Per-page layout** — for each key screen, offer a couple of layout options
(`references/style-menu.md` lists landing-page and dashboard patterns) and record the choice
with its rationale, not just a single default.
6. **Responsive rules** — breakpoints, and a genuinely distinct mobile design where the
SRS calls for mobile (not a shrunken desktop).
7. **Motion & interaction** — states (hover/focus/active/disabled/loading/error), timing.
8. **Voice** — the design system is half the identity; how the product *sounds* is the other
half. Every string in the inventory (labels, errors, empty states, tooltips, onboarding)
goes through **swarm-write**, against the project's `voice.md`. Copy is interface, not
decoration applied afterwards.
## 4. Review against the UX-laws checklist (apply as review, not jargon)
Fitts (targets big and near) · Hick (fewer choices at decision points) · Jakob (follow
platform conventions) · Miller (chunk information) · proximity/common-region (group
related things) · Doherty (feedback < 400 ms) · error prevention over error messages. Run the
pre-delivery checklist in `references/style-menu.md` before calling UI work done.
## Rules
- Accessibility is explicit for graphical UIs: contrast ratios, focus order, touch
targets, reduced-motion.
- TUI/CLI projects: skip all graphical guidance and the style menu; help text, flags, exit
codes, and error style ARE the design (see `references/tui-cli.md`).
- End with user validation (gated) or FR-coverage self-check (auto); update flow-state.
---
*Influences: Laws of UX (Yablonski); Atomic Design (Frost); roadmap.sh/design-system;
checklist.design; Figma typography guide; NameThatUI (component vocabulary); Anthropic
frontend-design skill — see CREDITS.md.*
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!