Use when designing a new schema, writing a migration, adding or auditing indexes, reviewing query performance, choosing between hard delete and soft delete, or establishing database conventions for a project.
Scanned 5/28/2026
npx -y skills add aneja5/forge-skills --skill database-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Database Design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aneja5-database-design)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: database-design
description: Use when designing a new schema, writing a migration, adding or auditing indexes, reviewing query performance, choosing between hard delete and soft delete, or establishing database conventions for a project.
---
# Database Design
## Overview
Define the project's schema conventions and migration safety policy *before* migrations land in production. Outputs `.forge/database-design.md` (naming, FK rules, audit columns, soft-delete policy, index strategy, partition strategy, RLS/tenant-scoping rules) and `.forge/migrations-policy.md` (reversibility, idempotency, locking-aware patterns, the query-review checklist). Consumed by `architecture-and-contracts` and `incremental-implementation`.
## When to Use
- A new project starts and the schema is being designed
- A migration is being written that touches a table >1M rows
- An ORM is generating N+1 queries in a hot path
- An audit reveals tables with no FK constraints or missing indexes
- The team is debating soft delete vs hard delete and there's no policy
- A production query is timing out and there's no EXPLAIN process
## When NOT to Use
- Adding a column to a tiny dev-only table where conventions already apply
- Schema-less stores (Mongo, DynamoDB) — see `architecture-and-contracts` data-model section instead
- A migration on an existing project that has documented conventions and the change is local
## Common Rationalizations
| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "We can add indexes later" | Missing indexes in production cause outages, not slowdowns. A full table scan on a 50M-row table locks the DB. |
| "Soft delete is always better" | Soft delete without a cleanup job becomes data hoarding. GDPR forces real deletion eventually. |
| "ORMs handle it" | ORMs generate N+1 queries by default. Lazy loading + a loop = production incident. |
| "One big migration is fine" | Irreversible migrations are deployment landmines. Forward-only with a long expand-contract window is the safe path. |
| "We don't need FK constraints, the app enforces it" | The app has bugs. The DB doesn't. FK constraints are the last line of defense against orphan rows. |
| "Let's just denormalize for speed" | Denormalization without a sync job creates two sources of truth that diverge. |
## Red Flags
- `ALTER TABLE large_table ADD COLUMN ... NOT NULL` with no locking review
- Foreign key columns without indexes
- A migration that drops or renames a column without a deprecation window
- Soft delete columns (`deleted_at`) with no cleanup or RLS policy
- ORM `findAll()` followed by `.map(item => item.related)` (N+1)
- A query that scans rows without an EXPLAIN run
- No `created_at` / `updated_at` audit columns
- Multi-tenant tables without RLS or `tenant_id` indexes
## Core Process
### Step 1: Define naming conventions
Write these to `.forge/database-design.md`:
- Tables: `snake_case`, plural (`users`, `task_assignments`)
- Columns: `snake_case`, no abbreviations (`created_at` not `cr_at`)
- Primary keys: `id` (UUIDv7 preferred — sortable, no hot shards)
- Foreign keys: `<table_singular>_id` (`user_id`, `task_id`)
- Indexes: `idx_<table>_<columns>`
- Constraints: `chk_<table>_<rule>`, `unq_<table>_<columns>`
- Audit columns required on every business table: `created_at`, `updated_at` (timestamptz, server-set)
### Step 2: Audit existing schema (if applicable)
Run a check: every FK has an index? every business table has audit columns? every soft-delete table has cleanup? Record violations in `.forge/database-design.md` with an owner and a deadline.
### Step 3: Set migration guardrails
In `.forge/migrations-policy.md`:
- **Reversibility:** every migration has an explicit `down`. Forward-only migrations require an ADR.
- **Idempotency:** `CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS`, `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS`, `CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS`.
- **Locking-aware:** `CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY` on Postgres. Online schema change (gh-ost, pt-osc) for MySQL on large tables. Never `ALTER TABLE` with `ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK` during business hours.
- **Expand-contract pattern:** add new column → backfill → switch reads → drop old column over multiple deploys.
- **Backup before destructive:** any `DROP COLUMN`, `DROP TABLE`, `TRUNCATE`, or destructive `UPDATE` requires a snapshot reference in the PR.
### Step 4: Write the query-review checklist
Append to `.forge/database-design.md`:
- Every hot-path query has been EXPLAINed (Postgres) or `EXPLAIN ANALYZE`d
- No sequential scan on a table >100k rows
- No N+1 — verify with query logs in a test that simulates the loop
- Index used for every JOIN and WHERE condition
- LIMIT used on any user-facing list query
- Pagination uses cursor (not OFFSET) for large tables
### Step 5: Identify partition candidates
Tables likely to exceed 100M rows (events, logs, audit, time-series): plan partitioning *before* they grow. Document the partition key (usually `created_at` range or `tenant_id` hash) and the retention/cleanup job.
### Step 6: Document RLS / tenant-scoping rules
For multi-tenant systems:
- Every business table has `tenant_id` and a Row-Level Security policy
- Application-side defense (every query filters by `tenant_id`) + DB-side defense (RLS) — both, not either-or
- The contract from `architecture-and-contracts` MUST specify which tables are tenant-scoped
### Step 7: Headers
Prepend a `forge:meta` header on both `.forge/database-design.md` and `.forge/migrations-policy.md` (co-output — both share the same `depends_on` + `generated_from`): `generated_by: database-design`, `generated_at: <ISO 8601 UTC with Z>`, `depends_on: [.forge/architecture.md]` — paths only, never hashes, `generated_from: {.forge/architecture.md: <upstream content_hash AT generation time>}`, `content_hash: <sha256 first 8 of THIS file's body>` (each file computes its own). See [forge-dependency-graph](../../references/forge-dependency-graph.md).
## Verification
- [ ] `.forge/database-design.md` written with naming conventions, soft-delete policy, partition strategy
- [ ] `.forge/migrations-policy.md` written with reversibility, idempotency, locking-aware rules
- [ ] Every migration in the codebase is idempotent (`IF NOT EXISTS` or equivalent)
- [ ] Every FK has an index (verified via schema query)
- [ ] Every business table has `created_at` and `updated_at`
- [ ] Every hot-path query has an EXPLAIN attached to the PR (or linked in `.forge/database-design.md`)
- [ ] No migration drops user-visible data without an ADR
- [ ] Multi-tenant tables have RLS policies and `tenant_id` indexes
- [ ] N+1 queries are gone from the codebase (verified by query-count test in CI)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!