Pass App Store and Play review on the first attempt and recover fast from rejections. Use when preparing a mobile submission, writing store metadata, or responding to a review rejection.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Amey-Thakur/AI-SKILLS --skill app-store-readiness --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of App Store Readiness?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/amey-thakur-app-store-readiness)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: app-store-readiness
description: Pass App Store and Play review on the first attempt and recover fast from rejections. Use when preparing a mobile submission, writing store metadata, or responding to a review rejection.
---
# App store readiness
Review is a checklist you can run yourself before Apple or Google does.
Most rejections are self-inflicted: a broken demo login, an undeclared
permission, metadata that oversells.
## Method
1. **Sweep the known landmines.** Sign-in-with-Apple required if you offer
third-party login (iOS); in-app purchase required for digital goods (no
external payment links); account deletion must be reachable in-app;
every permission prompt needs a purpose string that names the feature.
Each of these alone is a rejection.
2. **Make the reviewer's path frictionless.** A working demo account in
the review notes, backend up during the review window, and a one-line
explanation of anything non-obvious (hardware needs, region-locked
content, background modes). Reviewers reject what they cannot exercise.
3. **Complete the data declarations honestly.** Privacy nutrition labels
(iOS) and Data safety (Play) must match what your SDKs actually
collect; crash and analytics SDKs count. A mismatch found later forces
an emergency resubmission.
4. **Treat metadata as conversion surface within the rules.** Title and
subtitle carry the keywords; screenshots show the product's real UI
(mockups that misrepresent get rejected); the first two screenshots
decide the install. No competitor names, no "best" claims, no platform
names in titles.
5. **Stage the rollout controls before submitting.** Phased release
enabled, release notes written for users (not commit logs), and the
build already tested through TestFlight / internal track by real
devices, not only simulators.
6. **On rejection, respond surgically.** Read the cited guideline number,
reply in Resolution Center with facts or fix exactly what is cited, and
resubmit. Argue only when the reviewer misunderstood the app, and
attach a screen recording proving it; escalate to App Review Board /
Play policy support when a human loop is stuck.
## Boundaries
- Review times and enforcement vary; never commit a public launch date to
a build that has not passed review.
- This does not cover legal compliance (COPPA, GDPR, export); store
approval is not legal clearance.
- Guidelines change quarterly; before each major submission, re-check the
current review guidelines rather than trusting this list as complete.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!