Skip to content
Back to skills

Fact Check

ASecurity

Use when reviewing design documents, architecture specs, technical proposals, or plans that make claims about API names, file paths, enum values, counts, or mechanism feasibility — a lightweight claim-by-claim check against the codebase with evidence. Built into embedded-workbench as the fallback when the full logicprobe plugin is not installed. NOT for state machines, protocol/retry logic, or 'always'/'never' behavioral claims that need executable model verification — those require the logic...

  • 13 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added September 2, 2026
ai-agentsrefactoringapisecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 2, 2026

npx -y skills add AmethystLuna/embedded-workbench --skill fact-check --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Fact Check?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Fact Check
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/amethystluna-fact-check/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/amethystluna-fact-check)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: fact-check
description: "Use when reviewing design documents, architecture specs, technical proposals, or plans that make claims about API names, file paths, enum values, counts, or mechanism feasibility — a lightweight claim-by-claim check against the codebase with evidence. Built into embedded-workbench as the fallback when the full logicprobe plugin is not installed. NOT for state machines, protocol/retry logic, or 'always'/'never' behavioral claims that need executable model verification — those require the logicprobe plugin."
---

# Fact Check (fallback)

Lightweight claim verification built into this plugin. Use it when the full
`logicprobe` plugin is not installed — it checks every verifiable claim in a
document/plan against the codebase with evidence, without model escalation.

## When to use

- Design docs, architecture specs, technical proposals, refactoring plans
  that name APIs, types, files, enums, counts, or mechanisms.
- Proactively when a plan will be approved (plan-mode gate) and logicprobe is
  unavailable.

## What to verify (per claim)

| Claim type | Method |
|-----------|--------|
| Numeric claims (counts, sizes, frequencies) | `grep -c` / `grep -rn` |
| API/type/enum names | Extract actual signatures/values from headers |
| File paths and line numbers | Confirm existence and content |
| Mechanism feasibility | Check language standard / compiler support |

## Process

1. Enumerate every verifiable claim (quote it verbatim).
2. Verify each against the codebase with evidence (file:line + excerpt).
3. Output per claim: claim → evidence → verdict.

## Output format

- **Claim**: <verbatim quote>
- **Evidence**: <file:line + grep/read excerpt>
- **Verdict**: confirmed | refuted | unverifiable
- **Correction direction** (when refuted) — never fix inline.

Append a `## Plan Verification` block:

```markdown
## Plan Verification
- **Mode**: fact-check (fallback — logicprobe plugin not installed)
- **Claims checked**: [N] confirmed, [M] refuted, [K] unverifiable
- **Escalation**: model verification NOT run (requires logicprobe plugin)
```

## Boundaries

- **No executable model verification** — no state-space exploration, no harness.
- State machines (≥3 states), ACK/NACK/retry/timeout logic, lock/unlock
  ordering, and "always"/"never"/"guaranteed" claims require the `logicprobe`
  plugin: install it (see `.dsh/INSTALL.md`) or tell the user verification is
  degraded to manual mode for those claims.
- Checking a claim is not a security audit; being checked ≠ being safe.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.