Skip to content
Back to skills

Compare Distribution Paths With Failure Costs

ASecurity

Compare candidate distribution paths using supplied cost, time and disruption evidence. Use when a cheapest quoted route may fail the delivery requirement.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 26, 2026
ai-agents

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 26, 2026

npx -y skills add alisonjieli-png/loop-engine --skill compare-distribution-paths-with-failure-costs --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Compare Distribution Paths With Failure Costs?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Compare Distribution Paths With Failure Costs
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/alisonjieli-png-compare-distribution-paths-with-failure-costs/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/alisonjieli-png-compare-distribution-paths-with-failure-costs)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: compare-distribution-paths-with-failure-costs
description: Compare candidate distribution paths using supplied cost, time and disruption evidence. Use when a cheapest quoted route may fail the delivery requirement.
---

# Compare distribution paths with failure costs

## When to use

Use for one shipment class and decision horizon with two or more feasible path designs. A path is the sequence of handoffs, not merely a carrier quote.

## Inputs

- Origin, destination, shipment constraints, promised arrival window and supplied evaluation weights or hard thresholds.
- For each path: handoffs, capacity, transport and handling charges, transit-time evidence, historical disruption observations, insurance or recovery terms, and data dates.
- Supplied rule for valuing lateness, damage, returns and recovery effort; unknown values stay unknown.

## Procedure

1. Draw each full path and name the party and evidence for each handoff. Exclude a path that violates a hard physical, regulatory, capacity or service constraint without inventing a waiver.
2. Normalize quoted charges to the same shipment quantity, currency and time basis. Identify charges omitted by one quote, including transfer and return legs.
3. Compute a range of total burden for each feasible path: known direct charges plus scenario-based late, damage and recovery consequences under the supplied valuation rule. Keep scenario assumptions visible.
4. Compare arrival evidence against the promise using the same start and end events. Report uncertainty and sample size rather than treating a single prior shipment as a reliable rate.
5. Identify a conditional choice or the missing observation that could reverse it. Do not present an unsupported point estimate as a measured failure cost.

## Completion check

Return path diagrams, eligibility reasons, cost and timing bases, burden ranges, unresolved terms, and a decision conditional on the supplied thresholds. Keep disqualified paths in the record.

## Known-wrong case and stop

A route with a lower line-haul quote but an unpriced transfer and a missed hard delivery window is not automatically cheaper or eligible. Stop a final selection when required handoffs, service evidence, valuation rules or authority to choose are missing. Do not book transport or alter a contract.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.