/cs:gc-review <plan> — General Counsel interrogation of contracts, IP, regulatory, term sheets, and employment-law surface. Use when reviewing a term sheet before signing, redlining a customer MSA, or checking IP assignment and regulatory exposure on a new product.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill gc-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gc Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/alirezarezvani-gc-review-claude-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "gc-review"
description: "/cs:gc-review <plan> — General Counsel interrogation of contracts, IP, regulatory, term sheets, and employment-law surface. Use when reviewing a term sheet before signing, redlining a customer MSA, or checking IP assignment and regulatory exposure on a new product."
---
# /cs:gc-review — General Counsel Forcing Questions
**Command:** `/cs:gc-review <plan>`
The General Counsel lens. Six questions before any contract, term sheet, IP move, or regulatory commitment. This is a lane gstack has zero of — and one where a single missed clause costs more than a year of engineering.
> ⚠️ **Not legal advice.** This command surfaces the right questions to ask before talking to outside counsel. Always engage qualified counsel for binding decisions.
## When to Run
- Before signing any contract > $100K or > 1 year
- Before issuing equity (employee grants, advisor grants)
- Before a term sheet response
- Before entering a regulated market (healthcare, fintech, defense)
- Before any open-source license decision in core IP
- Before an M&A LOI
## The Six GC Questions
### 1. IP Ownership
**Who owns the IP being created or shared in this transaction?**
- Work-for-hire vs license vs joint.
- For employees and contractors: written IP assignment in place?
- For OSS: license compatibility checked?
### 2. Liability & Indemnity
**What's the liability cap, and what's carved out from it?**
- Standard cap: 12 months of fees.
- Carve-outs: IP infringement, data breach, willful misconduct.
- Mutual indemnity desirable.
### 3. Data Processing
**What personal data is involved, and is a DPA in place?**
- GDPR / CCPA scope?
- Subprocessor flow-down?
- Data residency requirements?
### 4. Termination & Renewal
**What's the termination right, what's the notice period, and what's auto-renew?**
- Termination for convenience vs cause.
- Notice period (30 / 60 / 90 days).
- Auto-renewal trap?
### 5. Regulatory Surface
**Does this expose the company to a new regulatory regime?**
- Healthcare → HIPAA.
- Fintech → BSA/AML, state money-transmitter.
- Medical device → FDA, MDR, ISO 13485.
- Data → GDPR, CCPA, state breach laws.
### 6. Employment / Equity
**If this is a hire or contractor: jurisdiction, classification, equity grant, IP assignment?**
- Misclassification risk?
- Equity vesting standard (4-year, 1-year cliff)?
- Acceleration triggers?
- 409A current?
## Workflow
1. Read the contract / term sheet end to end
2. Run the six questions
3. Identify the top-3 issues that need outside counsel review
4. Apply the verdict
## Output Format
```markdown
# GC Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Document
- Type: <contract / term sheet / grant / DPA>
- Counterparty: <name>
- $ value or scope: <amount>
## Issues
| # | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <e.g., uncapped IP indemnity> | HIGH | Cap at fees paid, mutual |
| 2 | <e.g., 5-year auto-renew> | MED | 1-year max, 60-day notice |
| 3 | <e.g., no DPA, EU data> | HIGH | Require DPA before sign |
## Regulatory Trigger
- New regime triggered? <yes/no>
- Specific frameworks: <HIPAA / GDPR / etc.>
## Outside Counsel Action Items
- [ ] <specific item 1>
- [ ] <specific item 2>
- [ ] <specific item 3>
## Verdict
🟢 SIGN AS-IS (rare)
🟡 NEGOTIATE — counter on top-3 issues
🔴 DO NOT SIGN — material risk
```
## Routing
- `/cs:ciso-review` — for any data-touching contract
- `/cs:cfo-review` — for any commitment > 1 year or > 1% of revenue
- `/cs:decide` — log the verdict after outside counsel review
## Workflow Integration with `general-counsel-advisor` skill
Since v2.5.1, this command is backed by a full skill at `../../../c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor/` with two Python tools:
```bash
# Automated contract scan (12 founder-killer patterns)
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py path/to/contract.txt
# Term sheet scoring (0-100 founder-friendliness)
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/term_sheet_analyzer.py path/to/term_sheet.json
```
The `cs-general-counsel-advisor` agent orchestrates both tools plus 3 references (contracts playbook, IP + regulatory, term sheet decoder).
## Related
- Skill: [`general-counsel-advisor`](../../../c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor/SKILL.md) — full skill with Python tools + references
- Agent: [`cs-general-counsel-advisor`](../../agents/cs-general-counsel-advisor.md)
- Compliance execution: `../../../ra-qm-team/`
- Adjacent: `../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ma-playbook/`
---
**Version:** 1.0.0
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!