Audits pipeline health from a deal list (CSV, table or plain notes) — prioritises deals, flags zombies and single-threaded risks, checks close-date realism and outputs a weekly action plan. Use when the user says "review my pipeline", "which deals should I focus on", "why is nothing closing", or shares a list of open deals.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add alebgl77/claude-inc --skill pipeline-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pipeline Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/alebgl77-pipeline-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pipeline-review
description: Audits pipeline health from a deal list (CSV, table or plain notes) — prioritises deals, flags zombies and single-threaded risks, checks close-date realism and outputs a weekly action plan. Use when the user says "review my pipeline", "which deals should I focus on", "why is nothing closing", or shares a list of open deals.
---
# Pipeline Review — Pipeline Doctor
> "Pipeline truth over pipeline comfort."
## When to use
- "Review my pipeline" (paste/attach deals: name, value, stage, last contact, next step)
- "What should I focus on this week?"
- "My forecast feels fake"
- Weekly ritual; also before any forecast conversation
- Works from a CSV, a markdown table, or messy notes — it will structure them first
## Workflow
1. **Normalise the data** into: deal, value, stage, last meaningful contact, next step (dated?), single or multi-threaded.
2. **Apply the health checks**: no dated next step = zombie; last contact > 14 days = cooling; one contact person = single-threaded; close date in the past or "end of quarter" 3 quarters running = fiction; stage vs. evidence mismatch (e.g. "negotiation" but no proposal sent).
3. **Score priorities**: value × probability × momentum. Big-but-dead loses to small-but-moving.
4. **Prescribe per deal**: exactly one action — advance (specific move), revive (pattern-break touch), or kill (graceful close-out that preserves the relationship).
5. **Summarise the week**: top 3 focus deals with their actions, deals to kill this week, and the one systemic habit to fix (found in the patterns — e.g. "you never set next steps on first calls").
6. **Forecast sanity line**: weighted realistic total vs. optimistic total, in one sentence.
## Output format
```
## Pipeline review — {date} · {n} deals · realistic: {€X} (optimistic: {€Y})
| Deal | Value | Health | Diagnosis | THE action this week |
|------|-------|--------|-----------|----------------------|
| ... | ... | 🟢🟡🔴 | ... | ... |
**Focus 3**: 1. {deal} → {action} 2. ... 3. ...
**Kill list**: {deals} — with the close-out line to send
**Systemic fix**: {the one habit}
```
## Quality bar
- [ ] Every deal gets exactly one action, none gets "keep monitoring"
- [ ] Zombies named and killed out loud, with a graceful exit message
- [ ] Single-threaded deals flagged with a second-contact suggestion
- [ ] Realistic vs. optimistic totals both stated
- [ ] The systemic fix targets a pattern, not a deal
## Example
**Ask**: "12 deals pasted from my notes, which 3 matter?"
**Produced**: normalised table, 4 zombies flagged (2 killed with exit lines), focus 3 with concrete moves ("send option-B nudge before Thursday"), systemic fix: every call ends with a dated next step.

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!