Detect common security vulnerabilities in code. Covers OWASP patterns, SQL injection, bare excepts, shell injection. Framework-agnostic.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add aiskillstore/marketplace --skill security-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Security Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aiskillstore-security-audit-53bd7a8a)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: security-audit
description: "Detect common security vulnerabilities in code. Covers OWASP patterns, SQL injection, bare excepts, shell injection. Framework-agnostic."
---
# Security Audit Skill
Detect common security vulnerabilities during code review and development. Based on OWASP guidelines and common vulnerability patterns.
## Design Principle
This skill is **framework-generic**. It provides universal security patterns:
- Covers OWASP Top 10 and common CWEs
- Works with Python, TypeScript, and other languages
- Project-specific security requirements go in project-specific skills
## Variables
| Variable | Default | Description |
|----------|---------|-------------|
| SEVERITY_THRESHOLD | medium | Minimum severity to report |
| SCAN_DEPTH | 3 | Directory depth for scanning |
| INCLUDE_TESTS | false | Include test files in scan |
## Instructions
**MANDATORY** - Follow the Workflow steps below in order.
1. Identify security-sensitive code areas
2. Check for common vulnerability patterns
3. Report findings with severity
4. Suggest remediation
## Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider
If you're about to:
- Write SQL with string concatenation
- Use bare `except:` blocks
- Execute shell commands with user input
- Store secrets in code
- Disable security features "temporarily"
**STOP** -> Use parameterized queries -> Add specific exception handling -> Then proceed
## Cookbook
### SQL Injection Prevention
- IF: Writing database queries
- THEN: Read and execute `./cookbook/sql-injection.md`
### Bare Except Handling
- IF: Writing exception handlers
- THEN: Read and execute `./cookbook/bare-except.md`
### Shell Injection Prevention
- IF: Executing shell commands
- THEN: Read and execute `./cookbook/shell-injection.md`
## Vulnerability Patterns
### SQL Injection (CWE-89)
**BAD - String concatenation:**
```python
# VULNERABLE
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}"
cursor.execute(query)
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '" + name + "'"
```
**GOOD - Parameterized queries:**
```python
# SAFE
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))
# SQLAlchemy
session.query(User).filter(User.id == user_id).first()
# Prisma
await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: userId } })
```
### Bare Except (CWE-754)
**BAD - Catches everything:**
```python
# VULNERABLE - hides bugs, catches KeyboardInterrupt
try:
risky_operation()
except:
pass
# VULNERABLE - too broad
except Exception:
log.error("Something failed")
```
**GOOD - Specific exceptions:**
```python
# SAFE - specific exceptions
try:
risky_operation()
except ValueError as e:
log.warning(f"Invalid value: {e}")
except ConnectionError as e:
log.error(f"Connection failed: {e}")
raise
```
### Shell Injection (CWE-78)
**BAD - User input in shell:**
```python
# VULNERABLE
os.system(f"grep {user_input} /var/log/app.log")
import subprocess
subprocess.run(f"ls {directory}", shell=True)
```
**GOOD - Avoid shell, use lists:**
```python
# SAFE - no shell
subprocess.run(["grep", user_input, "/var/log/app.log"])
# SAFE - validated input
if not re.match(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$', directory):
raise ValueError("Invalid directory name")
subprocess.run(["ls", directory])
```
### Path Traversal (CWE-22)
**BAD - User input in paths:**
```python
# VULNERABLE
path = f"/uploads/{user_filename}"
with open(path) as f:
return f.read()
```
**GOOD - Validate and sanitize:**
```python
# SAFE
from pathlib import Path
upload_dir = Path("/uploads").resolve()
requested = (upload_dir / user_filename).resolve()
if not requested.is_relative_to(upload_dir):
raise ValueError("Path traversal attempt")
with open(requested) as f:
return f.read()
```
### Hardcoded Secrets (CWE-798)
**BAD - Secrets in code:**
```python
# VULNERABLE
API_KEY = "sk-1234567890abcdef"
DB_PASSWORD = "super_secret_password"
```
**GOOD - Environment variables:**
```python
# SAFE
import os
API_KEY = os.environ["API_KEY"]
DB_PASSWORD = os.environ["DB_PASSWORD"]
# Or with defaults for development
API_KEY = os.getenv("API_KEY", "dev-key-only")
```
### XSS (CWE-79)
**BAD - Unsanitized output:**
```html
<!-- VULNERABLE -->
<div>{{ user_input }}</div>
```
**GOOD - Proper escaping:**
```html
<!-- SAFE - auto-escaped in most frameworks -->
<div>{{ user_input | e }}</div>
<!-- Or use textContent in JS -->
element.textContent = userInput; // Safe
```
## Severity Levels
| Severity | Impact | Examples |
|----------|--------|----------|
| CRITICAL | Data breach, RCE | SQL injection, shell injection |
| HIGH | Data exposure, privilege escalation | Path traversal, hardcoded secrets |
| MEDIUM | Information disclosure | Verbose errors, bare excepts |
| LOW | Best practice violation | Missing input validation |
## Detection Patterns
### Python Patterns to Search
```python
VULNERABLE_PATTERNS = {
"sql_injection": [
r'execute\([\'"].*%s.*[\'"].*%', # % formatting in SQL
r'execute\(f[\'"]', # f-string in SQL
r'execute\([\'"].*\+', # String concat in SQL
],
"shell_injection": [
r'os\.system\(', # os.system
r'subprocess\..*shell=True', # shell=True
r'eval\(', # eval
r'exec\(', # exec
],
"bare_except": [
r'except\s*:', # bare except
],
"hardcoded_secrets": [
r'password\s*=\s*[\'"]', # password = "..."
r'api_key\s*=\s*[\'"]', # api_key = "..."
r'secret\s*=\s*[\'"]', # secret = "..."
],
}
```
### TypeScript Patterns to Search
```typescript
const VULNERABLE_PATTERNS = {
sqlInjection: [
/`SELECT.*\$\{/, // Template literal in SQL
/"SELECT.*" \+ /, // String concat in SQL
],
xss: [
/innerHTML\s*=/, // innerHTML assignment
/dangerouslySetInnerHTML/, // React dangerous prop
],
shellInjection: [
/exec\([`'"]/, // child_process.exec
/spawn\(.*shell:\s*true/, // shell: true
],
};
```
## Audit Workflow
### Step 1: Identify Sensitive Areas
```markdown
Check these high-risk areas first:
- Authentication/authorization code
- Database queries
- File operations
- External API calls
- User input handling
- Serialization/deserialization
```
### Step 2: Run Pattern Scan
```markdown
For each source file:
Match against vulnerability patterns
Record file, line, pattern matched
Assess severity
```
### Step 3: Generate Report
```markdown
# Security Audit Report
## Summary
- CRITICAL: 2
- HIGH: 5
- MEDIUM: 12
## Critical Issues
### 1. SQL Injection in user_service.py:45
Pattern: f-string in execute()
```python
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
```
**Fix**: Use parameterized query
```python
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))
```
```
## Integration
### With /ai-dev-kit:execute-lane
Run security audit in code-related lanes:
```markdown
Lane: SL-API
Post-implementation checks:
1. ✓ Tests pass
2. ✓ Lint clean
3. ⚠️ Security audit: 2 MEDIUM issues
Review security findings before merge.
```
### CI Integration
```yaml
- name: Security Audit
run: |
# Check for vulnerable patterns
grep -rn "execute(f" --include="*.py" && exit 1 || true
grep -rn "shell=True" --include="*.py" && exit 1 || true
grep -rn "except:" --include="*.py" && echo "Warning: bare except found"
```
## Best Practices
1. **Defense in depth**: Multiple layers of security
2. **Least privilege**: Minimum permissions needed
3. **Input validation**: Validate all external input
4. **Output encoding**: Escape output appropriately
5. **Secrets management**: Never hardcode secrets
6. **Error handling**: Don't expose internal details
7. **Logging**: Log security events (not sensitive data)
8. **Updates**: Keep dependencies updated
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!