Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add aiskillstore/marketplace --skill domain-authority-auditor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Domain Authority Auditor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aiskillstore-domain-authority-auditor)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: domain-authority-auditor
slug: domain-authority-auditor
displayName: "Domain Authority Auditor · 域名权威"
summary: "域名权威/网站可信度"
description: 'Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度'
version: "17.0.0"
license: Apache-2.0
compatibility: "Claude Code and compatible agent-skill hosts"
homepage: "https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills"
when_to_use: "Use when auditing domain trust and citation authority against a declared peer cohort. Runs the typed CITE 40-item profile with explicit evidence gaps and veto verification."
argument-hint: "<domain> <market> <peer cohort> [domain type]"
class: auditor
metadata: {"author": "aaron-he-zhu", "version": "17.0.0", "discipline": "seo-geo", "phase": "monitor", "geo-relevance": "medium", "hermes": {"tags": ["marketing", "seo-geo", "monitor"], "category": "seo-geo"}, "openclaw": {"emoji": "🔍", "homepage": "https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills"}}
---
# Domain Authority Auditor
Audit one domain's citation-trust signals relative to a declared peer cohort. Produce a complete CITE score only when all applicable evidence and comparison context are present. CITE is advisory; it does not predict whether an answer engine will cite the domain.
## When This Must Trigger
- The user asks whether a domain is trustworthy, authoritative, or citation-ready.
- A campaign needs a peer-relative CITE baseline or rerun.
- Link, entity, penalty, or citation evidence may materially change a domain gate.
## Quick Start
```text
Audit example.com against these five same-stage U.S. SaaS peers.
Run the CITE content-publisher profile; mark every private-data gap Unknown.
```
## Skill Contract
Use `offsite-signal-analyzer` for link diagnosis without a gate, `content-quality-auditor` for one page, and `entity-optimizer` for canonical entity repair. Compare multiple domains as separate same-profile runs; never score them as one pooled target.
**Reads:** one domain, one locked cohort, and dated citation/identity/trust/eminence evidence. **Writes:** only a permissioned v3 artifact. **Done when:** context is complete, all 40 states are explicit, the scorer result is preserved, and any saved artifact validates.
## Instructions
### Runtime Contract
Read `../../../references/auditor-runbook.md`, `scoring-semantics.md`, `cite-domain-rating.md`, and the `CITE` entry in `framework-catalog.json`. For standalone installs, use bundled immutable `references/auditor-runtime.md`; never fetch mutable `main` or guess missing policy. Before deterministic calls, follow [`runtime-invocation.md`](../../../references/runtime-invocation.md), resolve `AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}"`, and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return `score_state: NOT_SCORED` / `score_confidence: not_scored` with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.
### Required Setup
Declare:
- one canonical domain and observation date;
- market and entity stage;
- domain type/profile: `default`, `content-publisher`, `product-service`, `ecommerce`, `community-ugc`, `tool-utility`, or `authority-institutional`;
- a locked peer cohort with inclusion rules and evidence window.
Without peer cohort, market, stage, or domain type, return `NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED`; the inherited numeric anchors are diagnostic priors, not universal thresholds.
## Data Sources
| Need | Preferred evidence |
|---|---|
| Links | Dated backlink export/index with known coverage |
| Identity | Structured data, canonical profiles, knowledge-graph/public entity evidence |
| Trust | Link-history comparison, security checks, authorized console evidence |
| Eminence | Search/analytics visibility and locked peer/query panels |
| Cohort | Named domains plus inclusion/exclusion, market, stage, type, and window |
### Evidence Procedure
1. Normalize the domain and verify scope (host/subdomain/protocol treatment).
2. Freeze backlink, entity, security, search visibility, citation-panel, and reputation evidence with sources/dates.
3. Evaluate all 40 IDs against the declared cohort. Tool estimates remain `estimated` or `proxy`; user exports remain `user-provided` unless independently verified.
4. Use Unknown for absent backlink indexes, private console data, or comparison universes. Do not mark link-dependent items N/A simply because data is unavailable.
5. Apply catalog-authorized N/A only with a reason, for example an AI-citation item when no locked panel is in scope.
6. Verify vetoes positively:
- `CITE-T03`: material link/traffic incoherence plus corroborating manipulation evidence relative to the cohort.
- `CITE-T05`: verified manipulation network after common-source/ecosystem adjustment.
- `CITE-T09`: verified active manual action or material unresolved deindexing.
Domain youth, privacy-protected WHOIS, low absolute volume, or missing private-console access cannot by themselves fail a veto.
Create a typed `audit-run.schema.json` input and execute `python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json>` when the verified runtime is available. Never renormalize weights around Unknown items.
## Report
Lead with verdict, profile/cohort/target/date, score or `NOT_SCORED` coverage/interval, and confidence. Then provide:
- C/I/T/E score and coverage table;
- peer-relative evidence and cohort definition;
- verified risks versus unresolved Unknowns;
- top fixes with owner, evidence needed, and rerun condition;
- provenance appendix, including qualified IDs when detailed traceability is requested.
Use SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED as the canonical artifact verdict. User-facing prose may say trusted/cautious only as a descriptive translation, never as a separate decision system.
## Verdict Rules
- Complete, no veto, healthy score/no failures: `DONE` + `SHIP`.
- Complete, remediation needed or one veto: `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS` + `FIX`; one veto caps final at 59.
- Complete, 2+ verified vetoes: `DONE` + `BLOCK`; no final score.
- Missing applicable/cohort evidence: `NEEDS_INPUT` + `UNDECIDED`; no score.
Route link investigation to `offsite-signal-analyzer`, technical/index evidence to `technical-seo-checker`, entity repair to `entity-optimizer`, and page quality to `content-quality-auditor`.
## §2 CITE Worked Examples
- Complete product-service profile, raw 78, one verified T09 failure: `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX`, final 59.
- Complete profile, raw 45, one verified T05 failure: final remains 45; the ceiling never raises a score.
- Verified T03 and T05 failures with complete evidence: `DONE/BLOCK`, raw retained, no final score.
- Missing backlink universe or private-console evidence: affected items are Unknown and no total is emitted.
## §3 CITE Guardrails
- Young domain age and WHOIS privacy are neutral without contradictory evidence.
- A press/launch spike can explain link velocity; test the explanation before labeling manipulation.
- Absolute volume is interpreted within peer cohort, entity stage, market, and domain type.
- Public index absence does not prove a private manual action; T09 requires positive evidence.
## §5 CITE Translation
Use plain descriptions by default. On a trace request, show `CITE-T03`, `CITE-T05`, and `CITE-T09` with source/date/cohort; never expose an unqualified ID.
## Persistence
Persist only after explicit authorization. Assemble the complete v3 draft, validate it against the intended `memory/audits/domain/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md` relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Use:
```bash
python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/validate-audit-artifact.py" <draft> --relative-path <target>
```
The audit request itself does not authorize hot-cache, candidate, or registry writes.
## Validation Checkpoints
- Target/profile/market/stage/cohort are explicit and locked.
- All 40 IDs have evidence-backed state, Unknown, or valid N/A.
- Absolute anchors were not applied as cohort-independent laws.
- Vetoes are verified failures, not absence-of-evidence shortcuts.
- Scorer output, coverage, confidence, status, and verdict are preserved.
- Persisted artifact is permissioned, path-correct, minimized, and validator-clean.
## Reference Materials
- [CITE benchmark](../../../references/cite-domain-rating.md)
- [Auditor runbook](../../../references/auditor-runbook.md)
- [Scoring semantics](../../../references/scoring-semantics.md)
- [Offsite signal analyzer](../offsite-signal-analyzer/SKILL.md)
## Next Best Skill
- **Investigate links:** [offsite-signal-analyzer](../offsite-signal-analyzer/SKILL.md)
- **Repair entity state:** [entity-optimizer](../../../protocol/entity-optimizer/SKILL.md)
- **Verify technical/index state:** [technical-seo-checker](../../optimize/technical-seo-checker/SKILL.md)
- **Audit representative content:** [content-quality-auditor](../../optimize/content-quality-auditor/SKILL.md)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!