Structural analysis of one file — classes, methods, exports, common patterns, semantic classification of a diff. Returns the file's *shape* without reading the file body. Use when: - "What classes and methods does X file have" - "Show me a table / outline of <file>" - "Run query: find all decorated functions in file X" - "Is this diff a refactor or a behavior change" (semantic classification) - "Find patterns like singleton / factory in this code" Replaces: reading the whole file (~20k toke...
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer --skill tsa-structure --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tsa Structure?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aimasteracc-tsa-structure-tree-sitter-analyzer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tsa-structure
version: 2.0.0
description: |
Structural analysis of one file — classes, methods, exports, common patterns,
semantic classification of a diff. Returns the file's *shape* without reading
the file body.
Use when:
- "What classes and methods does X file have"
- "Show me a table / outline of <file>"
- "Run query: find all decorated functions in file X"
- "Is this diff a refactor or a behavior change" (semantic classification)
- "Find patterns like singleton / factory in this code"
Replaces: reading the whole file (~20k tokens for big files) with structural
views (200-1000 tokens).
allowed-tools:
- mcp__tree-sitter-analyzer__structure
- mcp__tree-sitter-analyzer__search
- mcp__tree-sitter-analyzer__health
- mcp__tree-sitter-analyzer__edit
- Bash
- Read
---
# tsa-structure — File shape without the file body
## Tool routing
| Question | Tool |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Outline / table of classes + methods | `structure action=analyze` |
| Run a tree-sitter query (e.g., all `def` nodes) | `search action=query` |
| Detect design patterns (singleton, factory, …) | `health action=patterns` |
| Classify a diff (refactor vs feature vs fix) | `edit action=classify` |
## Procedure
### File outline (most common)
```yaml
structure action=analyze file_path="tree_sitter_analyzer/health_scorer.py"
# returns: {classes: [...], functions: [...], imports: [...]}
```
For a markdown-formatted table:
```bash
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --table full
```
### Custom tree-sitter query
When you need something the built-in tools don't surface:
```yaml
search action=query file_path="..." query_key="class"
# OR
search action=query file_path="..." query_string="(decorated_definition) @decorated"
```
`--list-queries` (CLI) shows all built-in queries available per language.
### Diff classification
```yaml
edit action=classify file_path="..." before_hash="abc" after_hash="def"
# returns: {classification: "refactor|feature|bugfix|test|docs|chore", confidence: 0.92}
```
Useful for PR descriptions and CHANGELOG categorization.
### Pattern detection
```yaml
health action=patterns file_path="..." patterns=["singleton", "factory", "observer"]
```
## CLI equivalents
```bash
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --table full # outline
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --query-key class # built-in query
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --query-string "(...)" # custom query
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --code-patterns
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer --semantic-classify # edit action=classify
```
## Anti-patterns
- DON'T read the whole file just to find "what classes are in it" — use the structure tool
- DON'T write a custom tree-sitter query when `structure action=analyze` covers it
- DON'T use `edit action=classify` on huge multi-purpose commits — split them first
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!