Back to skills
SKILL.md
Fabrico Designing Multi Cloud Architecture
ASecurityDesign multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to select and integrate services across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use when building multi-cloud systems, avoiding vendor lock-in, or leveraging best-of-breed services from multiple providers.
- 2 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 2 views
- Added September 6, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add aiFabricoCom/fabrico-collections --skill fabrico-designing-multi-cloud-architecture --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Fabrico Designing Multi Cloud Architecture?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aifabricocom-fabrico-designing-multi-cloud-architecture)---
name: fabrico-designing-multi-cloud-architecture
description: Design multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to select and integrate services across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use when building multi-cloud systems, avoiding vendor lock-in, or leveraging best-of-breed services from multiple providers.
---
# Multi-Cloud Architecture
Decision framework and patterns for architecting applications across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
## Purpose
Design cloud-agnostic architectures and make informed decisions about service selection across cloud providers.
## When to Use
- Design multi-cloud strategies
- Migrate between cloud providers
- Select cloud services for specific workloads
- Implement cloud-agnostic architectures
- Optimize costs across providers
## Cloud Service Comparison
### Compute Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case |
| ------- | ------------------- | --------------- | ------------------ |
| EC2 | Virtual Machines | Compute Engine | IaaS VMs |
| ECS | Container Instances | Cloud Run | Containers |
| EKS | AKS | GKE | Kubernetes |
| Lambda | Functions | Cloud Functions | Serverless |
| Fargate | Container Apps | Cloud Run | Managed containers |
### Storage Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case |
| ------- | --------------- | --------------- | -------------- |
| S3 | Blob Storage | Cloud Storage | Object storage |
| EBS | Managed Disks | Persistent Disk | Block storage |
| EFS | Azure Files | Filestore | File storage |
| Glacier | Archive Storage | Archive Storage | Cold storage |
### Database Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case |
| ----------- | ---------------- | ------------- | --------------- |
| RDS | SQL Database | Cloud SQL | Managed SQL |
| DynamoDB | Cosmos DB | Firestore | NoSQL |
| Aurora | PostgreSQL/MySQL | Cloud Spanner | Distributed SQL |
| ElastiCache | Cache for Redis | Memorystore | Caching |
**Reference:** See `references/service-comparison.md` for complete comparison
## Multi-Cloud Patterns
### Pattern 1: Single Provider with DR
- Primary workload in one cloud
- Disaster recovery in another
- Database replication across clouds
- Automated failover
### Pattern 2: Best-of-Breed
- Use best service from each provider
- AI/ML on GCP
- Enterprise apps on Azure
- General compute on AWS
### Pattern 3: Geographic Distribution
- Serve users from nearest cloud region
- Data sovereignty compliance
- Global load balancing
- Regional failover
### Pattern 4: Cloud-Agnostic Abstraction
- Kubernetes for compute
- PostgreSQL for database
- S3-compatible storage (MinIO)
- Open source tools
## Cloud-Agnostic Architecture
### Use Cloud-Native Alternatives
- **Compute:** Kubernetes (EKS/AKS/GKE)
- **Database:** PostgreSQL/MySQL (RDS/SQL Database/Cloud SQL)
- **Message Queue:** Apache Kafka (MSK/Event Hubs/Confluent)
- **Cache:** Redis (ElastiCache/Azure Cache/Memorystore)
- **Object Storage:** S3-compatible API
- **Monitoring:** Prometheus/Grafana
- **Service Mesh:** Istio/Linkerd
### Abstraction Layers
```
Application Layer
↓
Infrastructure Abstraction (Terraform)
↓
Cloud Provider APIs
↓
AWS / Azure / GCP
```
## Cost Comparison
### Compute Pricing Factors
- **AWS:** On-demand, Reserved, Spot, Savings Plans
- **Azure:** Pay-as-you-go, Reserved, Spot
- **GCP:** On-demand, Committed use, Preemptible
### Cost Optimization Strategies
1. Use reserved/committed capacity (30-70% savings)
2. Leverage spot/preemptible instances
3. Right-size resources
4. Use serverless for variable workloads
5. Optimize data transfer costs
6. Implement lifecycle policies
7. Use cost allocation tags
8. Monitor with cloud cost tools
**Reference:** See `references/multi-cloud-patterns.md`
## Migration Strategy
### Phase 1: Assessment
- Inventory current infrastructure
- Identify dependencies
- Assess cloud compatibility
- Estimate costs
### Phase 2: Pilot
- Select pilot workload
- Implement in target cloud
- Test thoroughly
- Document learnings
### Phase 3: Migration
- Migrate workloads incrementally
- Maintain dual-run period
- Monitor performance
- Validate functionality
### Phase 4: Optimization
- Right-size resources
- Implement cloud-native services
- Optimize costs
- Enhance security
## Process
1. **Assess requirements** → Identify drivers (DR, compliance, best-of-breed, cost)
2. **Choose pattern** → Select from patterns above based on requirements
3. **Map services** → Use service comparison tables to select equivalents
4. **Design abstraction** → Use Kubernetes + Terraform for portability
5. **Plan networking** → Design cross-cloud connectivity (VPN, interconnect)
6. **Implement IaC** → Use `fabrico-implementing-terraform-modules` skill
7. **Set up observability** → Unified monitoring across clouds
8. **Document runbooks** → Cloud-specific operational procedures
## Checklist
- [ ] Multi-cloud drivers documented (DR, compliance, vendor diversification)
- [ ] Service equivalents mapped across target clouds
- [ ] Abstraction layer chosen (Kubernetes, Terraform, or both)
- [ ] Cross-cloud networking designed and secured
- [ ] Identity federation configured (single IAM source of truth)
- [ ] Unified monitoring and logging implemented
- [ ] Cost allocation and tracking across clouds
- [ ] DR/failover procedures tested
- [ ] Team trained on all target cloud platforms
## Anti-Patterns
| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do |
|----------|-------|
| Use proprietary services for portability needs | Choose cloud-agnostic alternatives (K8s, PostgreSQL) |
| Duplicate everything across clouds | Be intentional about what runs where |
| Manage each cloud differently | Use unified IaC and observability |
| Ignore data transfer costs | Design to minimize cross-cloud traffic |
## Reference Files
- `references/service-comparison.md` - Complete service comparison
- `references/multi-cloud-patterns.md` - Architecture patterns
## Related Skills
- `fabrico-implementing-terraform-modules` - For IaC implementation
- `fabrico-optimizing-cloud-cost` - For cost management
Files in this skill
- SKILL.md
- references/multi-cloud-patterns.md
- references/service-comparison.md
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.