Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Red Teamer

ASecurity

Plan and execute authorized red-team operations that emulate real adversaries to test detection and response, with strict scoping and safety controls.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/29/2026
ai-agentsrustgotestingdatabasesecurity

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/29/2026

$npx -y skills add aicodedecode/awesome-muse-skills --skill red-teamer --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Red Teamer?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Red Teamer
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/aicodedecode-red-teamer/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aicodedecode-red-teamer)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: red-teamer
description: Plan and execute authorized red-team operations that emulate real adversaries to test detection and response, with strict scoping and safety controls.
category: security
---

## Overview

Red teaming emulates a real adversary — objectives-based, stealthy, and persistent — to answer one question: **would we detect and stop a genuine attack?** Unlike a pentest (which finds as many vulns as possible), a red team has a mission (e.g., "exfiltrate the customer database undetected") and tests the *defenders*, not just the technology.

This skill covers operation planning, rules of engagement, and reporting from the defender's perspective: how to scope, authorize, run safely, and convert results into blue-team improvements. It describes methodology at the standard published level only — no TTP details, no payloads, no tooling instructions.

The best red teams measure themselves by blue-team improvement, not by trophies. Every undetected technique should become a detection; every slow response should become a faster playbook. If the same objectives succeed the same way a year later, the operation failed regardless of how impressive the initial access was.

## When to use

- Testing whether your SOC and IR actually work against a realistic adversary.
- Validating detection coverage for specific scenarios (ransomware, BEC, insider).
- After major defensive investments, to measure improvement.
- Never without explicit written authorization, defined objectives, and safety controls. Unauthorized "red teaming" is just attacking.

## Core concepts

- **Objectives, not vulnerabilities:** the operation is built around adversary objectives (access, persistence, collection, impact). Findings are gaps in *detection and response*, not CVE lists.
- **Rules of engagement (ROE):** written, signed, and specific — targets, allowed techniques, forbidden actions (no real data exfiltration, no destructive payloads, no targeting individuals' personal accounts), time windows, and abort criteria.
- **Trusted agents and white cards:** a small control group knows the operation is happening (to prevent a real IR meltdown or physical-security incident); everyone else does not. Pre-agreed "white cards" pause the op instantly.
- **Get-out-of-jail coordination:** legal, HR, and physical security briefed in advance where relevant; on-call contacts for false-alarm deconfliction.
- **Assume-breach starting points:** red teams often start with a foothold (phished creds, insider) to test *lateral* detection rather than spending the whole op on initial access.
- **The real deliverable is detection gaps:** every red-team action maps to "did we detect it? how fast? what fired, what was missing?"

- **Crown-jewel focus.** Objectives should target what the business cannot afford to lose — customer data, payment systems, core IP — not just 'get domain admin' as an abstract trophy.
- **Realistic constraints.** Real adversaries face time, risk, and OPSEC constraints. Emulate patient, careful actors sometimes — the noisy smash-and-grab is only one profile.
- **Document the negative space.** Techniques attempted but abandoned (and why) are valuable — they show where defenses actually worked.

## Practical workflow

1. **Define objectives with leadership:** 2–4 mission objectives tied to crown jewels (e.g., "access the finance system and demonstrate data access without triggering a P1"). Get written authorization from someone who can actually authorize it.
2. **Write the ROE:** scope, allowed/forbidden techniques, data-handling rules (synthetic data only; any real PII encountered = stop and report), time windows, abort/pause procedures, emergency contacts.
3. **Plan the campaign:** phases (recon → initial access → persistence → lateral movement → objective), mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for the debrief. Build in safety checks per phase.
4. **Execute with control:** maintain a detailed op log (every action timestamped). If anything touches real customer data, production stability, or goes out of scope — stop, document, notify the control group.
5. **Hot debrief:** immediately after, walk blue through the timeline: what was done, what was detected, what was missed, detection latency per step.
6. **Report and improve:** findings framed as detection/response gaps with concrete remediation (new detection rule, log source to onboard, playbook to write). Schedule a re-test of the same objectives in 6–12 months to measure improvement.

### ROE checklist

- [ ] Written authorization from accountable executive
- [ ] Objectives, in-scope and out-of-scope targets enumerated
- [ ] Forbidden actions explicit (destructive, data exfiltration, personal targeting)
- [ ] Data-handling rules for incidentally encountered real data
- [ ] Time windows and abort/white-card procedure
- [ ] Control group and emergency contacts; legal/HR/physical-security briefed as needed

### Sustaining the practice

- Re-test the same objectives annually to measure the improvement delta
- Feed every TTP into the detection backlog with ATT&CK mapping
- Vary operator styles and tooling so blue does not overfit to one red team
- Brief executives on the improvement story, not just the breach story

### Metrics that prove it works

- Detection rate per operation phase (where did blue see you?)
- Mean time to detect per technique used
- % of objectives achieved vs detected-and-stopped
- Blue-team improvement delta on re-test of the same objectives

## Common pitfalls

- **No written authorization.** This is non-negotiable. Verbal approval does not cover anyone when something breaks.
- **Testing the tech instead of the team.** A red team that just runs vuln scans is an expensive pentest. Keep the focus on detection and response.
- **Surprising your own SOC into chaos.** Deconfliction exists so a drill does not trigger a real company-wide incident response — or worse, law enforcement.
- **Real data handling failures.** Plan for incidental PII exposure: stop, report, delete per policy. Never retain or use it.
- **No follow-through.** A red-team report that does not produce detection engineering work is entertainment, not security.
- **Ego-driven ops.** The goal is a stronger blue team, not proving red is clever. Celebrate detections as loudly as misses.
- **Reusing the same TTPs every operation.** Blue overfits to your playbook and the assessment stops measuring real adversary coverage. Vary techniques deliberately.
- **No purple-team follow-up.** Findings that become a report instead of detection-engineering tickets are theater. Schedule the purple session before the op ends.
- **Testing during critical business periods.** Blackout windows (product launches, financial close) must be respected — an op that disrupts revenue loses executive support permanently.
- **Poor OPSEC hygiene in reports.** Op logs containing real credentials or sensitive paths need the same handling as the ROE demands for data.

Attribution

aicodedecodeaicodedecode
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from aicodedecode →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →