Analyze marketing performance — attribution, funnel analysis, cohort reports, dashboards, and data-driven recommendations.
Scanned 9/29/2026
npx -y skills add aicodedecode/awesome-muse-skills --skill marketing-analyst --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Marketing Analyst?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aicodedecode-marketing-analyst)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: marketing-analyst
description: Analyze marketing performance — attribution, funnel analysis, cohort reports, dashboards, and data-driven recommendations.
category: business-marketing
---
## Overview
Marketing analysts turn raw data into decisions: which channels deserve budget, where the funnel leaks, which campaigns actually drove revenue. This skill covers measurement fundamentals (UTMs, attribution models), core analyses (funnel, cohort, CAC/LTV), dashboard design, and presenting findings so stakeholders act on them.
## When to use
- Deciding where to allocate marketing budget
- Diagnosing a drop in leads or conversions
- Building a marketing dashboard or report
- Evaluating campaign ROI
- Choosing or challenging an attribution model
- Preparing a quarterly marketing performance review
- Building marketing mix models for budget allocation
- Setting up multi-touch attribution
- Investigating sudden performance changes
- Building executive marketing dashboards
- Evaluating incrementality of campaigns
- Forecasting pipeline from marketing activities
## Core concepts
**Attribution models.** First-touch (credits discovery), last-touch (credits conversion), linear/multi-touch (spreads credit), data-driven (algorithmic). No model is "true" — each answers a different question. Use first-touch for channel discovery, multi-touch for budget allocation, and always sanity-check against incrementality.
**UTM discipline.** Consistent utm_source, utm_medium, utm_campaign tagging is the foundation. One naming convention, documented, enforced. Bad UTMs make analysis impossible.
**Funnel analysis.** Track conversion between stages (visitor → lead → MQL → SQL → customer). Find the biggest relative drop — that's the leverage point. Segment by channel, campaign, and persona.
**Cohort analysis.** Group users by acquisition period or behavior, then track retention/revenue over time. Cohorts reveal whether changes actually improved things or just coincided with growth.
**CAC and LTV.** Customer Acquisition Cost = marketing+sales spend ÷ new customers. Lifetime Value = average revenue per customer × gross margin × lifespan. Healthy businesses keep LTV:CAC above 3:1. Track both by channel — blended averages hide disasters.
**Incrementality.** The gold standard: would these conversions have happened anyway? Geo-tests, holdout groups, and pre/post analyses separate real lift from correlation.
**Marketing mix modeling (MMM).** Statistical analysis of how spend across channels drives revenue, using historical data. Strengths: captures offline and brand effects, works without user-level tracking. Weaknesses: needs 2+ years of data, slow to reflect changes. Use MMM for strategic budget splits, multi-touch attribution for tactical optimization.
**Self-reported attribution.** Adding how-did-you-hear-about-us to signup or demo forms. Crude but captures the dark funnel (podcasts, word-of-mouth, communities) that tracking misses. Treat as directional; triangulate with other data.
**Incrementality testing.** Geo-holdouts, PSA-based control groups, and pre/post with synthetic controls measure true causal lift.
Last-click attribution over-credits bottom-funnel and starves top-funnel — incrementality tests reveal what actually drives new revenue.
Run 2–4 incrementality tests yearly on your biggest spend areas; the results reshape budgets.
**Cohort analysis.** Group by acquisition period, channel, or campaign — then track retention, revenue, and payback over time.
Cohorts reveal quality differences that aggregate metrics hide: channel A drives volume, channel B drives value.
Always cohort before concluding; aggregates lie.
**Data infrastructure.** Tracking plan (events, properties, naming conventions) → warehouse (single source of truth) → transformation (dbt-style models) → BI layer (dashboards) → governance (definitions, access, quality checks).
Analysts without infrastructure spend 80% of time cleaning data — invest in plumbing.
## Practical workflow
1. **Define the question.** "Which channels should get more budget?" beats "analyze marketing data." Write the decision the analysis must inform.
2. **Audit the data.** Check tracking: UTMs consistent? Events firing? CRM stages defined the same way by everyone? Fix instrumentation before analyzing.
3. **Build the funnel view.** Stage-to-stage conversion rates, overall and by channel/campaign. Identify the biggest leaks.
4. **Run the core analyses.** Channel CAC vs. LTV, cohort retention curves, campaign ROI with appropriate attribution, trend analysis (is performance improving or degrading?).
5. **Find the story.** Data doesn't speak; analysts do. Lead with the insight ("Paid search CAC rose 40% while lead quality fell — driven by broad-match expansion"), then evidence, then recommendation.
6. **Recommend and follow up.** Every analysis ends with: what to do, expected impact, how we'll know it worked. Revisit after the change ships.
**Dashboard essentials:** KPI tiles (leads, CAC, LTV:CAC, pipeline, revenue), trend lines (not just snapshots), funnel visualization, channel comparison table, cohort retention heatmap. One screen, updated automatically, reviewed weekly.
**Anomaly investigation protocol:** 1) verify data (tracking broken?), 2) check external factors (seasonality, holidays, competitor moves), 3) segment (which channel, campaign, or audience changed?), 4) form hypothesis, 5) validate with a second data source before recommending action.
**Dashboard design:** audience first (execs need 5 numbers; managers need diagnostics) → hierarchy (KPI → trends → breakdowns) → annotations (mark campaigns, launches, anomalies) → alerts (not just dashboards — push the insights).
Dashboards nobody opens are decoration. Distribute insights; do not just publish dashboards.
**Analysis communication:** headline finding → supporting evidence (2–3 charts max) → limitations → recommendation → next steps.
Analysts who recommend get invited back; analysts who only describe get automated.
## Common pitfalls
- **Analysis without a question.** Exploring data aimlessly produces interesting-but-useless findings. Start from a decision.
- **Last-touch worship.** Crediting only the final click undervalues awareness channels and misallocates budget.
- **Vanity metrics.** Impressions and clicks without cost and conversion context mislead. Always pair with efficiency metrics.
- **Ignoring data quality.** Garbage in, garbage out. Broken tracking invalidates every conclusion — verify first.
- **Correlation as causation.** "Leads rose after the rebrand" isn't proof. Use holdouts and controls where stakes are high.
- **Reporting without recommendations.** A dashboard nobody acts on is decoration. Every report should drive a decision.
- **Blended averages.** Overall CAC looks fine while one channel burns money. Always segment.
- **Reporting without context.** Leads up 20% without noting the campaign that caused it or whether quality held. Every metric needs its story.
- **Ignoring lag.** B2B conversions lag spend by weeks or months. Judging recent spend on incomplete conversion windows misleads.
- **Correlation as causation.** "Email openers buy more" — or buyers open more email? Design tests for causality before recommending spend shifts.
- **Analysis paralysis.** Perfecting models while decisions wait. Timebox analysis; deliver directional answers fast, refine later.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!