Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria systematically in literature reviews. Use when: (1) Screening abstracts, (2) Reviewing full texts, (3) Documenting screening decisions, (4) Ensuring PRISMA compliance.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add aibot88/sec_skill_store --skill inclusion-criteria --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Inclusion Criteria?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aibot88-inclusion-criteria)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: inclusion-criteria
description: "Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria systematically in literature reviews. Use when: (1) Screening abstracts, (2) Reviewing full texts, (3) Documenting screening decisions, (4) Ensuring PRISMA compliance."
allowed-tools: Read, Write
version: 1.0.0
---
# Inclusion Criteria Application Skill
## Purpose
Systematically apply eligibility criteria during literature screening.
## Criteria Components
**PICOS Framework:**
- **P**opulation: Who?
- **I**ntervention: What?
- **C**omparison: Compared to?
- **O**utcome: Measuring?
- **S**tudy design: How?
## Example Criteria
**Inclusion:**
- Adults (18+ years)
- Randomized controlled trials
- Published in English
- Depression as primary outcome
- Published 2010-2024
**Exclusion:**
- Non-human studies
- Case reports/case series
- No control group
- Depression as secondary outcome only
## Decision Making
**Title/Abstract Screening:**
- Liberal inclusion (when in doubt, include)
- Quick decisions
- High sensitivity
**Full-Text Review:**
- Strict application of criteria
- Document reasons for exclusion
- Record in PRISMA flow diagram
---
**Version:** 1.0.0
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API