Use when completed work needs evaluation coverage audited across correctness, security, performance, and quality dimensions
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add aibot88/sec_skill_store --skill evaluation-coverage-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evaluation Coverage Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aibot88-evaluation-coverage-audit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: evaluation-coverage-audit
description: Use when completed work needs evaluation coverage audited across correctness, security, performance, and quality dimensions
type: colony
domains: [evaluation, testing, quality, audit]
agent_roles: [auditor, probe, watcher]
workflow_triggers: [continue]
task_keywords: [evaluation, coverage, missing, partial, quality gate]
priority: normal
version: "1.0"
---
# Evaluation Coverage Audit
## Purpose
After a phase is executed, this skill retroactively audits whether the evaluation criteria were actually covered. It scores each eval dimension (correctness, performance, security, etc.) as COVERED, PARTIAL, or MISSING, and produces an actionable remediation plan for gaps.
## When to Use
- User says "check eval coverage" or "audit the tests"
- After phase execution to verify quality
- Before shipping to ensure nothing was missed
- Milestone completion review
## Instructions
### 1. Eval Dimensions
```
Standard evaluation dimensions:
CORRECTNESS: Does it do what was specified?
EDGE_CASES: Does it handle edge cases and errors?
PERFORMANCE: Does it meet performance requirements?
SECURITY: Is it secure against known threats?
ACCESSIBILITY: Is it accessible (if UI)?
COMPATIBILITY: Does it work across required environments?
INTEGRATION: Does it integrate correctly with dependencies?
DATA_INTEGRITY: Does it maintain data consistency?
ERROR_HANDLING: Does it handle failures gracefully?
OBSERVABILITY: Can we monitor and debug it?
```
### 2. Coverage Audit
```
For each dimension:
1. Read the phase PLAN.md for stated evaluation criteria
2. Read the phase output artifacts (code, tests, configs)
3. Search for explicit test coverage of this dimension
4. Search for implicit coverage (tests that incidentally cover it)
5. Search for gaps (areas with no test or verification)
Score:
COVERED: Explicit tests exist and pass
PARTIAL: Some tests exist but not comprehensive
MISSING: No test coverage for this dimension
```
### 3. Audit Report
```
EVAL COVERAGE -- Phase {N}: {name}
Dimension | Score | Evidence
Correctness | COVERED | 12 tests, all pass
Edge Cases | PARTIAL | 3/5 edge cases tested
Performance | MISSING | No perf tests
Security | COVERED | Auth + input validation
Compatibility | PARTIAL | Only Chrome tested
Integration | COVERED | 8 integration tests
Error Handling | PARTIAL | Happy path covered
Data Integrity | COVERED | Constraint tests pass
Observability | MISSING | No logging/metrics
Overall: {covered}/{total} COVERED, {partial} PARTIAL, {missing} MISSING
Coverage score: {percentage}%
```
### 4. Remediation Plan
```
For each MISSING dimension:
1. Describe what's missing specifically
2. Recommend specific tests to add
3. Estimate effort to add coverage
4. Mark as blocking or non-blocking for phase completion
For each PARTIAL dimension:
1. Describe what's covered and what's not
2. Recommend additional tests
3. Estimate effort
4. Mark as recommended or optional
```
### 5. Cross-Phase Coverage
```
When run across all phases:
1. Identify dimensions consistently MISSING across phases
2. Identify patterns (e.g., security always PARTIAL)
3. Generate colony-wide remediation recommendations
4. Feed into milestone-gap-planner if gaps are significant
```
## Key Patterns
- **Score honestly**: A generous PARTIAL is worse than an honest MISSING.
- **Evidence-based**: Every score references specific test files or gaps.
- **Actionable gaps**: Every MISSING item comes with a fix recommendation.
- **Cross-phase learning**: Patterns in gaps reveal systemic issues.
## Output Format
```
EVAL | Phase {N}: {score}% coverage
{covered} | {partial} | {missing}
Remediation: {blocking} blocking, {recommended} recommended
Report: .aether/phases/phase-{N}/EVAL-REVIEW.md
```
## Examples
**Phase audit:**
> "Phase 3 eval coverage: 62%. 5 COVERED, 2 PARTIAL, 2 MISSING. Blocking: performance tests missing (API latency not verified). Recommended: add edge case tests for null inputs."
**Colony-wide pattern:**
> "Cross-phase eval: security is PARTIAL in 4/6 phases. Colony-wide recommendation: add security testing to standard phase template."
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!