Prove a DeepReason fix against its GOAL.md success criterion, optionally with one guarded live run, and record the honest outcome in VERIFY.md. Use after dr-implement-fix.
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add AHepi/DeepReason --skill dr-verify-outcome --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Dr Verify Outcome?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ahepi-dr-verify-outcome)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: dr-verify-outcome
description: Prove a DeepReason fix against its GOAL.md success criterion, optionally with one guarded live run, and record the honest outcome in VERIFY.md. Use after dr-implement-fix.
---
# Verify the outcome
Input: GOAL.md's machine-decidable success criterion + the pushed fix.
Output: VERIFY.md with verdict PASS or FAIL. You verify; you do not
patch. Any new code change belongs to a fresh cycle through the
orchestrator.
## Ladder of proof (ascend only as far as the goal requires)
1. **Criterion command.** Run GOAL.md's success command verbatim.
Paste output.
2. **Historical roots.** If the fix changed a reader/validator, re-run
`verify_root` against the committed roots that showed the defect
AND one known-good root: the target violations must disappear,
everything else must be unchanged. List remaining violations by
class — do not summarize them away.
3. **Live run (only if GOAL.md demands live proof).** At most ONE
attempt, fully guarded:
- Preflight: env file present, `deepreason` importable, run
identity free (retire + commit rename first if occupied).
- Launch detached from the ladder's own directory:
`setsid nohup ./<ladder>.sh & disown`.
- Arm rollback insurance: the snapshot loop (commit+push the
experiment dir every ~5 min) and a monitor on `progress.jsonl`
state/phase + the driver log's `rc=` lines, alerting on both
success AND failure signatures.
- Judge only typed outcomes: run state, stop_reason, audit JSON,
`verify_root`, FINDINGS.md. Model prose is not verification.
4. **Know what a live run can and cannot prove.** Model behavior is
stochastic across identically-configured runs (a capability channel
used in one attempt may go unused in the next). A live attempt that
never reaches the fixed path is INCONCLUSIVE for that path — say
so; the offline regression remains the proof of correctness. Do not
burn repeated live attempts chasing a stochastic path: one relaunch
maximum, then record the residue.
## VERIFY.md template
# Verification
Criterion command + output: <pasted>
Historical roots re-checked: <root -> before/after violation classes>
Live attempt (if any): <run id, typed stop, tokens, one-line audit>
Verdict: PASS | FAIL | PASS-offline/INCONCLUSIVE-live
Residue (honest): <what remains unproven or parked, or "none">
Errata: <docs/ERRATA.md entry id(s) added, or "errata: none">
## Closing the tranche (on PASS)
- Append a dated segment to the experiment's RESULTS.md: what was
observed, what was fixed, what the record now shows, and the honest
residue. "Accepted does not mean true"; never claim more than the
record shows.
- **Errata check — mandatory, before VERIFY.md is committed.** Did this
tranche find any committed document's claim (a handover, a map
document, a RESULTS.md, a spec, CLAUDE.md — anything docs/ERRATA.md
covers) to be wrong? If yes, the `docs/ERRATA.md` entry lands in the
SAME commit as VERIFY.md. If no, state "errata: none" explicitly in
VERIFY.md's Errata line — the same state-not-silence pattern this
template already uses for Residue: an omitted line is ambiguous, an
explicit "none" is not.
- Commit and push everything; confirm `git status` is clean and the
branch head is on the remote.
- Report: verdict, evidence pointers, PARKED.md contents as candidate
next tranches.
On FAIL: append the failure evidence to DIAGNOSIS.md, commit, and
return to the orchestrator (route: dr-diagnose). Never patch from
inside this skill.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!