Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Dr Reproduce

ASecurity

Demonstrate a diagnosed DeepReason cause with the smallest offline artifact — a failing test or a minimal script against the committed record. Use after DIAGNOSIS.md, before any fix.

142 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
testingpythongo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add AHepi/DeepReason --skill dr-reproduce --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Dr Reproduce?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Dr Reproduce
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ahepi-dr-reproduce/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ahepi-dr-reproduce)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: dr-reproduce
description: Demonstrate a diagnosed DeepReason cause with the smallest offline artifact — a failing test or a minimal script against the committed record. Use after DIAGNOSIS.md, before any fix.
---

# Reproduce the cause

Input: DIAGNOSIS.md's falsifiable prediction. Output: REPRO.md plus one
runnable artifact that shows the defect NOW (and will show its absence
after the fix). You still change no production code.

## Choose the cheapest sufficient form, in this order

1. **Record replay** — the defect is already capted in a committed run
   root: a script that runs `verify_root(<root>)` or walks the log and
   prints the violating fact. Zero live cost; deterministic.
2. **Offline unit reproduction** — construct the minimal state in a
   test: register the same problems/artifacts/policies the record
   shows and assert the wrong behavior happens. Reuse existing test
   helpers (`_prepare_run`, controller fixtures, `_policy` builders)
   from the nearest `tests/test_*.py`; do not invent new scaffolding
   when a helper exists.
3. **Minimal in-memory check** — a 20-line python3 heredoc proving the
   mechanism (e.g. round-trip a receipt through `canonical_json` and
   show key order changes). Acceptable as evidence, but pair it with
   form 1 or 2 for the regression artifact.

NEVER reproduce by launching a live provider run. Live runs are for
`dr-verify-outcome`, at most once, and only if the goal demands it.

## Fidelity rules

- The reproduction must mirror the live conditions the record shows,
  not a convenient simplification. If admission auto-accepted
  import-role artifacts before cycle 0, your fixture registers those
  artifacts too. A reproduction that passes for a different reason
  than the live failure will approve a wrong fix.
- One assertion states the DEFECT (currently failing or currently
  printing the violation), phrased so it inverts cleanly post-fix.
- Respect frozen-record invariants in fixtures: one manifest sha per
  capability chain, constant fence seqs within a proposal's chain —
  fixture WellFormednessError means your fixture is wrong, not the
  harness.

## REPRO.md template

    # Reproduction
    Form: record-replay | unit-test | in-memory
    Artifact: <path (test id) or inline command>
    Current output: <paste the failing/violating output, trimmed>
    Confirms diagnosis: yes — <one line linking output to mechanism>
    Post-fix expectation: <exact output/assertion after a correct fix>

If the reproduction REFUTES the diagnosis: write that in REPRO.md,
commit, and return to the orchestrator routing back to `dr-diagnose`.
A refuted diagnosis is a successful phase, not a failure.

## Exit criteria

- REPRO.md + artifact committed and pushed.
- The artifact demonstrably shows the defect today (output pasted).
- Production code untouched.
- Return to the orchestrator.

Attribution

AHepiAHepi
View sourceMore from AHepi →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Screen Reader Testing

Practical guide to testing web applications with screen readers for comprehensive accessibility validation.

393431 votes

Python Testing

使用pytest、TDD方法、夹具、模拟、参数化和覆盖率要求的Python测试策略。

2456590 votes

Tdd Workflow

在编写新功能、修复错误或重构代码时使用此技能。强制执行测试驱动开发,包含单元测试、集成测试和端到端测试,覆盖率超过80%。

2456590 votes

Springboot Tdd

使用JUnit 5、Mockito、MockMvc、Testcontainers和JaCoCo进行Spring Boot的测试驱动开发。适用于添加功能、修复错误或重构时。

2456590 votes

Eval Harness

克劳德代码会话的正式评估框架,实施评估驱动开发(EDD)原则

2456590 votes
View all in testing →