Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Dr Change Orchestrator

ASecurity

Entry point for implementing an operator-suggested change to DeepReason. Routes through capture, spec, plan, stepwise execution, validation, and delivery — one phase at a time, with a verbatim request ledger nothing may drift from. Use when the operator says "add", "change", "make it", "I want", or suggests any modification.

142 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
researchgo

Works with

cli

Security Analysis

A92/100
mediumInstalls packages at runtime which could introduce malicious dependencies

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add AHepi/DeepReason --skill dr-change-orchestrator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Dr Change Orchestrator?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Dr Change Orchestrator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ahepi-dr-change-orchestrator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ahepi-dr-change-orchestrator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: dr-change-orchestrator
description: Entry point for implementing an operator-suggested change to DeepReason. Routes through capture, spec, plan, stepwise execution, validation, and delivery — one phase at a time, with a verbatim request ledger nothing may drift from. Use when the operator says "add", "change", "make it", "I want", or suggests any modification.
---

# DeepReason change orchestrator

The operator has suggested a change. Your job is to implement exactly
that change — not the change you would have designed, not the
neighboring improvement, not a partial version you forgot to finish.
This workflow differs from `deepreason-orchestrator` (defects): there
is no diagnosis; the authority is the OPERATOR'S WORDS, and every
phase traces back to them.

## The ledger rule (the anti-forgetting mechanism)

`REQUEST.md` is the single source of authority. It holds the
operator's suggestion VERBATIM, split into numbered requirements
(R1, R2, ...). Every later artifact cites requirement numbers.

- **Before starting ANY phase, re-read REQUEST.md and CHECKLIST.md in
  full.** Context windows lose earlier turns; the ledger does not.
- If the operator sends a new message mid-workflow: APPEND it to
  REQUEST.md verbatim as new numbered requirements (or amendments
  "R2a supersedes R2") BEFORE acting on it, then route to
  `dr-spec-change` to reconcile. Never absorb new instructions
  silently into the current step.
- A requirement is never deleted, only marked `superseded-by:<n>` or
  `deferred (operator approved <where>)`.

## Scope contract

1. Implement what REQUEST.md says. Where it is silent, choose the
   smallest reasonable interpretation and RECORD the assumption in
   SPEC.md; where two readings differ materially in effort or
   behavior, stop and ask — one batched question, not a dribble.
   Before asking, load `dr-ask-the-right-question`: derive the answer
   from the record and the operator's recorded values first; a fork
   the dominance test kills is decided and noted, not asked.
2. Anything you notice that is broken but not requested: into
   `PARKED.md` (a defect goes to the `deepreason-orchestrator`
   workflow later). Never fix it now. Write the entry for its future
   runner, at park time: one line of WHAT, then a ready-to-send prompt
   (route, one-goal statement, evidence pointers, end state) — the
   follow-up should cost the operator a paste, not an authoring
   session.
3. Stop conditions: a step fails twice the same way; the spec turns
   out to require touching frozen-record semantics (state digests,
   event application, replay formats, qualification subjects); the
   estimated diff exceeds SPEC.md's budget; or a requirement
   contradicts the record/codebase (report the contradiction, do not
   pick a side silently). Every stop follows the standard format —
   decision in ONE sentence, options priced, a recommendation with its
   reason — canonical in `dr-drive-harness` §6's calibration note.

## Map preflight (do this before routing, every time)

Full procedure, canonical: `dr-drive-harness` §4 — `docs/map/INDEX.md`
→ `INV-frozen-surfaces.md` → seam document (before either subsystem) →
record the resolved ids in the tranche's first artifact.

The map is maintained by the phases that change code, in the same
commit — see `dr-execute-step` and `dr-implement-fix`. Nothing else may
advance a `Verified-at:` stamp.

## Environment preflight

Same as `deepreason-orchestrator`: verify branch head, working-tree
state, `deepreason` importable (else `pip install -e .
--break-system-packages -q`); resync the branch if the container
rolled back. Do this once before routing. The full driving manual —
preflight, CLI lifecycle, ladders, where to look — is
`dr-drive-harness`; load it if this session has not run the harness
before. Also load `pinker-write-for-readers` once per session, BEFORE
your first message the operator will see: it binds every
operator-facing message (intermediary status reports included, not
just the final one) — worry first, the operator's own vocabulary
instead of terms of art (a message that has to define a term has
failed — CLAUDE.md Conventions, 2026-09-03), one closing analogy on
the final output.

## Routing table

| State of the tranche | Route to |
|---|---|
| Operator words not yet in REQUEST.md | `dr-capture-request` |
| REQUEST.md exists, no SPEC.md (or new requirements appended) | `dr-spec-change` |
| SPEC.md approved, no CHECKLIST.md | `dr-plan-steps` |
| CHECKLIST.md has an unchecked step | `dr-execute-step` (exactly one step) |
| All steps checked, no VALIDATION.md | `dr-validate-change` |
| VALIDATION.md verdict PASS | `dr-deliver-change` |
| VALIDATION.md verdict FAIL | back to `dr-plan-steps` with the failure appended (re-plan the failing steps only) |

After EVERY phase (and every executed step): commit and push the
tranche directory — canonical rationale in `dr-drive-harness` §1.

## Tranche layout

One directory per suggestion, e.g. `experiments/<date>-change-<slug>/`:
`REQUEST.md`, `SPEC.md`, `CHECKLIST.md`, `VALIDATION.md`,
`DELIVERY.md`, `PARKED.md`.

## Hard prohibitions

- No code changes outside `dr-execute-step`, and no step outside
  CHECKLIST.md.
- Never edit committed run roots; never commit `env`/credential files —
  both procedures canonical in `dr-drive-harness` §1/§3.
- Never mark a checklist step done without pasting its done-criterion
  output.
- Never report the change complete without the R-by-R reconciliation
  table from `dr-deliver-change`.

Attribution

AHepiAHepi
View sourceMore from AHepi →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

798221 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →