Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Deepreason Orchestrator

ASecurity

Entry point for any DeepReason problem. Routes work to exactly one subskill at a time and enforces the scope contract. Use when asked to manage, diagnose, or fix anything in DeepReason.

142 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
researchgogit

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add AHepi/DeepReason --skill deepreason-orchestrator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Deepreason Orchestrator?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Deepreason Orchestrator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ahepi-deepreason-orchestrator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ahepi-deepreason-orchestrator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: deepreason-orchestrator
description: Entry point for any DeepReason problem. Routes work to exactly one subskill at a time and enforces the scope contract. Use when asked to manage, diagnose, or fix anything in DeepReason.
---

# DeepReason problem orchestrator

You are running a tightly bounded workflow. You do not freelance. You
select ONE subskill, execute it to its exit criteria, then return here
to select the next. You never blend phases.

## The scope contract (read before every phase)

1. **One tranche = one goal.** A tranche works exactly one GOAL.md
   (produced by `dr-set-goal`). Anything else you notice goes into
   `PARKED.md` — never into your work. Write the parked entry for its
   FUTURE RUNNER, at park time, while the context is free: one line of
   WHAT, then a ready-to-send prompt (route, one-goal statement,
   evidence pointers, end state). Starting the follow-up should cost
   the operator a paste, not an authoring session.
2. **Evidence over prose.** Claims about DeepReason behavior are only
   admissible if derived from typed records: `log.jsonl`, `objects/`,
   `progress.jsonl`, `run-status.json`, `REPLAY_VALIDATION.json`,
   `verify_root`, or test output. Your own summary of what code
   "probably does" is not evidence.
3. **No phase-skipping.** You may not implement without an approved
   FIX.md. You may not write FIX.md without a DIAGNOSIS.md. You may not
   write DIAGNOSIS.md without a reproduction or record-derived trace.
4. **Stop conditions.** Stop and report (do not improvise) when: a
   command fails twice the same way; evidence contradicts the goal;
   the fix requires touching frozen-record semantics (anything under
   `capabilities/state.py` digests, `harness.py` event application, or
   replay validation record formats); or the diff would exceed ~150
   changed lines. Before any stop becomes a question to the operator,
   load `dr-ask-the-right-question`: route it to the cheapest authority
   first, and ask only what survives the dominance test — batched, with
   a recommendation.

## Map and environment preflight (do this before routing, every time)

Full procedure, canonical: `dr-drive-harness` §1 (session/environment
preflight — branch resync, `deepreason` importable, credential check)
and §4 (map preflight — `docs/map/INDEX.md` → `INV-frozen-surfaces.md`
→ seam document → record the resolved ids in GOAL.md). Load it if this
session has not run the harness before. Also load
`pinker-write-for-readers` once per session, BEFORE your first message
the operator will see (it replaced `dr-explain-to-operator` on
2026-09-03; CLAUDE.md Conventions state what carries over).

The map is maintained by the phases that change code, in the same
commit — see `dr-execute-step` and `dr-implement-fix`. Nothing else may
advance a `Verified-at:` stamp.

## Routing table

Ask: what does the current state of the tranche lack?

| Missing artifact | Route to |
|---|---|
| No GOAL.md for this tranche | `dr-set-goal` |
| GOAL.md exists, no DIAGNOSIS.md | `dr-diagnose` |
| DIAGNOSIS.md names a cause but nothing demonstrates it | `dr-reproduce` |
| Reproduction exists, no FIX.md | `dr-propose-fix` |
| FIX.md exists, code unchanged | `dr-implement-fix` |
| Code changed, outcome unverified | `dr-verify-outcome` |
| dr-verify-outcome reported PASS | Tranche complete: report and stop |

If `dr-verify-outcome` reports FAIL, route back to `dr-diagnose` with
the failure evidence appended — do not patch forward from intuition.

## Tranche working directory

All tranche artifacts live in one directory the goal names, e.g.
`experiments/<date>-<slug>/`: `GOAL.md`, `DIAGNOSIS.md`, `REPRO.md`,
`FIX.md`, `VERIFY.md`, `PARKED.md`. Commit and push this directory at
every phase boundary (the container can vanish at any time):

    git add -A <tranche-dir> && git commit -m "<phase>: <one line>" \
      && git push -u origin <branch>

## Hard prohibitions (apply to every subskill)

- Never modify a committed run root's contents; never commit credential
  material — both procedures (retire-by-rename, `git check-ignore`) are
  canonical in `dr-drive-harness` §1/§3.
- Never run the full live ladder to test a code hypothesis — that is
  `dr-verify-outcome`'s final step only, and only when the goal calls
  for live proof.
- Never widen the goal because the codebase "needs" it. PARKED.md.

Attribution

AHepiAHepi
View sourceMore from AHepi →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

798221 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →