Skip to content
Back to skills

Pipeline Devices

ASecurity

Device pipeline analysis: feasibility and pivotal study stages, design-iteration cycles, RWE studies, and post-market obligations, with reimbursement-aware value framing and decision-track awareness across the med universe.

  • 206 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 22, 2026
ai-agents

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 25, 2026

npx -y skills add agentii-ai/agentii-investment-intelligence --skill pipeline-devices --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pipeline Devices?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pipeline Devices
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/agentii-ai-pipeline-devices/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/agentii-ai-pipeline-devices)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pipeline-devices
description: "Device pipeline analysis: feasibility and pivotal study stages, design-iteration cycles, RWE studies, and post-market obligations, with reimbursement-aware value framing and decision-track awareness across the med universe."
sectors: [med.medicines_biotech, med.medical_devices]
multi_ticker_semantics: single_target
temporal_scope:
  default_quarters: 8
  max_quarters: 20
  description: "Long-horizon pipeline window default 8 quarters; up to 20 for multi-year device development and post-market programs."
allowed_tools:
  - get_company_devices
  - search_universe_devices
  - search_clinical_trials
  - get_clinical_trial
  - get_device_decision
  - search_companies
  - get_company_profile
  - search_knowledge_entries
retrieval_scope: structured_only
min_tool_diversity: 3
parameter_free: false
---

> Methodology inspired by publicly taught medtech pipeline frameworks; all text is an original paraphrase.

## Defaults

| Parameter | Default Value | Rationale |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|
| asset_scope | all disclosed devices | Full-pipeline enumeration first |
| stage_lens | feasibility + pivotal | Design-iteration stages, not drug-phase labels |
| reimbursement_aware | true | Value framed against coverage paths, not raw approval |
| post_market_scan | true | Obligations and surveillance state surfaced |
| value_frame | risk-adjusted | Modeled value = unadjusted peak x POS, both shown |

## Preflight

Run canonical pre-flight per `contracts/preflight.md`. Include the `X-Agentii-Trace` header on every tool call per `contracts/x-agentii-trace-header.md` — carry the `_run_id` from your first tool result and name yourself (and your parent, if you were spawned). Confirm ticker resolution via `search_companies` before asset queries.

## Triggers

- "Analyze [ticker]'s device pipeline."
- "What is in [ticker]'s feasibility and pivotal portfolio?"
- "Where is each of [ticker]'s devices in its design cycle?"
- "Which of [ticker]'s programs are approaching submission?"
- "What RWE studies support [ticker]'s devices?"
- "What post-market obligations does [ticker] carry?"
- "Risk-adjust [ticker]'s device pipeline."
- "What is the next catalyst for each of [ticker]'s devices?"
- "How does [ticker]'s device pipeline compare to peers?"
- "Which device classifications (PMA/De Novo/510(k)) map to [ticker]'s pipeline?"
- "Map [ticker]'s devices by clinical stage and indication."
- "What does [ticker]'s pipeline say about its reimbursement path?"

## Production Grounding

- Device stage ladder: feasibility (first-in-human, small N) → pivotal (registrational) → submission (PMA / De Novo / 510(k)) → post-market. Devices iterate through design versions; design freezes and iteration cycles are the pipeline milestones, not drug-style phases.
- Pivotal design varies by classification: PMA demands the highest evidence bar, De Novo novel classification, 510(k) equivalence — the pipeline's value path depends on the expected track.
- RWE studies (registries, claims analyses) increasingly support coverage and label expansion; treat them as pipeline assets with their own timelines.
- Post-market obligations (surveillance studies, MDR reporting) shape long-term liability and the re-approval path.
- Reimbursement-aware framing: pipeline value assumes a coverage path; an asset without one is discounted.
- Grounding detail lives in `references/knowledge-frameworks.md`.

## Data Source Priority

1. `get_company_devices` / `search_universe_devices` — asset inventory from the med universe.
2. `search_clinical_trials` / `get_clinical_trial` — study stage, design type, status, enrollment.
3. `get_device_decision` — decision history and upcoming decisions per device.
4. Knowledge layer: `search_knowledge_entries` for framework grounding.

## Methodology

### Retrieval Scope
structured_only

### Retrieval Strategy
1. Pull asset inventory (`get_company_devices`), cross-check the universe (`search_universe_devices`).
2. Enrich per asset with study records (`search_clinical_trials`) — stage, design type, status-diff.
3. Pull decision history and upcoming dates (`get_device_decision`).
4. Flag post-market obligations and RWE study presence per asset.
5. Size each asset (peak x POS); ground in knowledge entries.

### Temporal Scope
See frontmatter temporal_scope block. Device development and post-market windows span years; history may reach back 8-12 quarters.

### Tool Allowlist
See frontmatter allowed_tools.

### Protocol
1. Asset enumeration
2. Stage and design-cycle mapping
3. Decision-track alignment
4. Post-market and RWE overlay
5. Risk-adjusted synthesis

## Modes

- **Phase scan** (default): all devices by stage with next catalyst and expected track.
- **Design cycle**: design-iteration state, freezes, and submission readiness.
- **Post-market**: obligations, surveillance state, and RWE support.

## Tool Fallbacks

| Failure | Fallback |
|---------|----------|
| get_company_devices empty | `search_universe_devices` by company or indication; annotate coverage_gap |
| No trial rows | Mark stage undisclosed; do not guess pivotal vs feasibility |
| No decision history | Flag the submission track unknown; state both possibilities |
| Knowledge tools empty | Proceed with structured data only |

## Output File

`{ticker}/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_pipeline-devices_{affix}.md`

## Output Structure

1. **Executive Summary** — pipeline stance in 2-3 sentences
2. **Asset Table** — stage, design type, expected track, next catalyst
3. **Design-Cycle Read** — iteration state, freezes, submission readiness
4. **Post-Market & RWE** — obligations, surveillance, registries
5. **Risk-Adjusted Sizing** — peak x POS with reimbursement framing
6. **Coverage Gaps** — missing records, undisclosed stage, degraded modes

## Error Handling

| Error | Fallback |
|-------|----------|
| Stage unknown | Mark "undisclosed"; do not guess |
| Classification ambiguous | State the evidence-bar difference across tracks |
| No catalysts found | Say so explicitly; note the pipeline may be early-stage |

## Memory Load

See `contracts/memory-load.md`.

## Snapshot

See `contracts/snapshot-synthesis.md`.

## Final Summary (TUI)

Include ### Key Citations block with 0-10 clickable /v/ URLs.

## References

- `contracts/citation-and-memory.md`
- `contracts/output-frontmatter-schema.md`
- `contracts/memory-load.md`
- `contracts/snapshot-synthesis.md`
- `contracts/preflight.md`
- `references/knowledge-frameworks.md`

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB
  • references/knowledge-frameworks.md4.6 KB
  • references/modes.md430 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.