Demonstrate that synthetic CoT traces with incorrect final answers outperform human-written correct solutions for supervised fine-tuning. Distribution proximity between training data and student model's natural output matters more than correctness—validating human traces with model-like distributions improves performance, providing practical guidance for dataset curation.
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ADu2021/skillXiv --skill shape-of-thought --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Shape Of Thought?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/adu2021-shape-of-thought)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: shape-of-thought
title: "Shape of Thought: When Distribution Matters More Than Correctness"
version: 0.0.2
engine: skillxiv-v0.0.2-claude-opus-4.6
license: MIT
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22255
keywords: [training-data, reasoning, distribution-alignment, synthetic-data]
description: "Demonstrate that synthetic CoT traces with incorrect final answers outperform human-written correct solutions for supervised fine-tuning. Distribution proximity between training data and student model's natural output matters more than correctness—validating human traces with model-like distributions improves performance, providing practical guidance for dataset curation."
---
## Overview
Challenges conventional wisdom that training data quality depends primarily on correctness.
## Core Technique
**Distribution Proximity Hypothesis:**
```python
# Human traces (H): correct but distribution-mismatched
# Model traces correct (G): correct and distribution-matched
# Model traces incorrect (W): incorrect but distribution-matched
# W outperforms H despite incorrectness
# because distribution proximity enables faster learning
```
## When to Use
Use when: Curating reasoning datasets, SFT training, synthetic data selection.
## References
- Distribution alignment vs correctness
- Partial correctness in synthetic data
- Dataset curation guidance
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.
Recovers prior coding-agent session context by running `catchup <agent> --since-compact`, which extracts a clean summary of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, OpenCode, or Pi Agent session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", or asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.
A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling