Use to create or adjust the CI/CD pipeline that materializes the SDD gates — lint, static analysis (type-check/complexity/SAST), tests (unit/integration/acceptance) and coverage from docs/engineering/TESTING.md, with coverage and static analysis published as artifacts, plus the "PR fails without an approved spec" rule. Detects GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / other. Generates the file only with approval. Trigger with /setup-ci.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill setup-ci --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Setup Ci?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/adriannoes-setup-ci)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: setup-ci
description: Use to create or adjust the CI/CD pipeline that materializes the SDD gates — lint, static analysis (type-check/complexity/SAST), tests (unit/integration/acceptance) and coverage from docs/engineering/TESTING.md, with coverage and static analysis published as artifacts, plus the "PR fails without an approved spec" rule. Detects GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / other. Generates the file only with approval. Trigger with /setup-ci.
---
> **Translation note:** Originally authored in Portuguese (pt-BR) by Igor Uehara ([igoruehara/spec-driven](https://github.com/igoruehara/spec-driven), MIT). Translated to English by this hub to keep the repository language consistent. Original content unchanged in meaning; see the upstream repo for the pt-BR source.
# Skill: CI/CD setup (SDD gates in the pipeline)
Materializes the SDD gates in the automated pipeline — this is where "a document the team tries to follow" becomes
"rules the system enforces". **Idempotent**: re-running adjusts the existing pipeline.
## Discover the target
- Detect the provider (GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / Bitbucket / other) from the repo and from `integrations.md`.
- Read `docs/engineering/TESTING.md` (gate commands) and the quality gate from `CLAUDE.md` (minimum coverage).
## Propose the pipeline (confirm before generating)
Stages in order; failing **blocks the merge**:
1. **Lint/format** → 2. **Static analysis** (type-check + complexity + SAST) → 3. **Unit** →
4. **Integration** → 5. **Acceptance** (one per `AC-N`) → 6. **Coverage** (min. from `CLAUDE.md`).
7. **SDD rule:** a PR that changes code **without an approved spec** in `specs/` → fails (a job that checks
the presence/status of the spec corresponding to the change).
**Traceable evidence:** publish **coverage and static analysis as artifacts** of the run (and, if the
provider allows, as a check/comment on the PR). The quality result gets attached to the change and
feeds the trend for `/metricas`.
## Generate
- The pipeline file (`.github/workflows/*.yml` / `.gitlab-ci.yml`) using the commands from
`docs/engineering/TESTING.md` — do not invent commands; reuse the ones there.
- ⚠️ **No secrets in the file** — use the provider's secrets. Confirm before writing.
- Record the pipeline choice as an **ADR** if it is structural; reference it in `docs/engineering/agentic-layer.md`.
## Next step
Pair with `/revisar-pr` (human/agent gate). Together they cover **review + automation**: CI enforces
tests/coverage/spec; `/revisar-pr` enforces process conformance on the PR/MR.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!