Use when David wants to build a structured strategic document by answering questions (life priorities, goals docs, framework files, ranked lists, principles, reviews). Interview one question at a time, patch the file after each answer, then re-ask. Not for day planning (use day-plan).
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill interview-style-doc-building --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Interview Style Doc Building?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/adriannoes-interview-style-doc-building)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: interview-style-doc-building
description: Use when David wants to build a structured strategic document by answering questions (life priorities, goals docs, framework files, ranked lists, principles, reviews). Interview one question at a time, patch the file after each answer, then re-ask. Not for day planning (use day-plan).
---
# Interview-Style Doc Building
David's preferred mode for creating durable strategic docs. AI does NOT propose content — AI asks one question, David answers, AI patches the file, AI asks the next question. The file IS the conversation's output, updated incrementally.
## When to use
- Building a new SSOT file (life priorities, life vision, principles, frameworks, ranked lists).
- Filling out a structured doc David explicitly wants to author himself.
- Quarterly/annual reviews where David's words go into the file.
**NOT for:** day planning (use `day-plan`), task triage (`organize-tasks`), or anything where AI proposes content first.
## The Loop
1. **Create the file** with a skeleton (header, sections, "to be filled in" placeholders). Single `write_file` for the new file. After this, NEVER overwrite — only `patch`.
2. **Ask ONE question.** Concise. Specific. Single-faceted. Open-ended where possible.
3. **Wait for the answer.** Don't ask the next question yet.
4. **Patch the file** with David's answer in the correct section.
5. **Re-ask** — next question, or follow-up if the answer was incomplete.
6. Repeat until the file is complete.
## Hard Rules
- **One question at a time.** Never dump multiple questions in a single message. David has flagged this.
- **Patch, don't overwrite.** After the initial skeleton, use `patch` for every update. Never `write_file` to an existing doc.
- **Update the file BEFORE asking the next question.** Order: receive answer → patch file → ask next question. Not the reverse.
- **Lists from David are UNORDERED SETS.** When David lists items in response to "which X should we cover?" or "what are the Ys?", that is a SET, not a ranking. Never infer rank, priority, or sequence from the order he typed them. If you need ordering, ask explicitly: "Which of these is #1?"
- **Ask dynamics, not names.** When David references a person, don't ask "who is X?" — ask about the role/dynamic.
- **No snark, no attitude, no filler.** Concise questions, concise acknowledgments.
- **No speculative additions.** Don't invent sections, edge cases, or "anything else?" prompts unless David asks.
## Question Design
- **Domain-discovery, not confirmation.** "What wins against everything else?" — not "Is Business #1?"
- **Surface new reality.** Each question should pull out info AI doesn't already have.
- **Engine-move framing where applicable.** "What's the thing that, if true, makes the rest obvious?"
- **Concrete over abstract.** "What's #2 — the domain that wins against everything except #1?" beats "Tell me about your second priority."
## File Patching Pattern
After each answer:
1. Read the relevant section (if not already in context).
2. `patch` with `old_string` = placeholder or previous entry, `new_string` = updated content with David's words preserved.
3. Confirm the diff. Move on.
For ranked lists, append one rank at a time:
```
1. **Business** — Q2 #1 goal: ...
2. **Health** — get below 81.0 kg, sleep 9h/day, ...
```
Each rank gets patched in as David confirms it.
## Common Pitfalls
- **Assuming order from a set.** David lists "A, B, C, D" → AI writes "1. A, 2. B, 3. C, 4. D" → David flags it. ALWAYS confirm rank explicitly.
- **Asking too many questions at once.** Even bundling 2 violates the rule.
- **Overwriting the file** instead of patching specific sections — destroys prior content.
- **Adding AI-generated content** to fill out sections. Sections stay empty until David provides the content.
- **Skipping the file update** between Q&A pairs — the doc falls out of sync.
## Pairing with Other Skills
- `day-plan` — different pattern (task triage), not interview-style.
- `organize-tasks` — Todoist-specific.
- `memory-management` — separate from this; persona/preferences go to memory.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!