Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Knowledge Graph Curator

ASecurity

> 版本:v1.0 | 分类:文化与组织运营 | 优先级:P1 > 作者:稷下 | 对标:Notion + Roam Research × Zettelkasten × 麦肯锡知识管理 > 触发场景:活动后24小时 / 项目复盘后 / 重要洞察产生时 / 定期知识梳理 ---

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 10/6/2026
researchpythonnode

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 10/6/2026

$npx -y skills add aAAaqwq/openclaw-team --skill knowledge-graph-curator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Knowledge Graph Curator?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Knowledge Graph Curator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/aaaaqwq-knowledge-graph-curator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aaaaqwq-knowledge-graph-curator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
# Knowledge Graph Curator — 外脑知识图谱构建与沉淀

> 版本:v1.0 | 分类:文化与组织运营 | 优先级:P1
> 作者:稷下 | 对标:Notion + Roam Research × Zettelkasten × 麦肯锡知识管理
> 触发场景:活动后24小时 / 项目复盘后 / 重要洞察产生时 / 定期知识梳理

---

## 核心价值

将俱乐部沙龙、项目复盘、外部情报等产生的认知成果,结构化沉淀到军团的"外脑知识图谱"中,供全员检索、复用、迭代,让军团的智慧持续积累而非流失。

---

## 知识管理最佳实践

### Zettelkasten(卢曼卡片盒)

尼尔斯·卢曼的卡片盒方法:
- 每条知识是一个独立的"卡片"
- 卡片之间通过链接形成网络
- 知识的价值在于链接,而非存储

稷下对齐:每条认知成果(Insight)必须包含"链接到其他知识"的连接,形成知识网络。

### 麦肯锡知识管理

麦肯锡的知识沉淀原则:
- 每次项目结束必须沉淀"经验教训"
- 知识库可供所有顾问检索
- 知识贡献是晋升考核的一部分

稷下对齐:每次活动/项目后,知识沉淀是强制流程。

---

## 知识图谱架构

```python
KNOWLEDGE_GRAPH = {
    "nodes": {
        "insight": "独立洞察(最小单元)",
        "person": "人物(碳基/硅基)",
        "project": "项目/任务",
        "event": "事件/活动",
        "concept": "概念/方法论"
    },
    "edges": {
        "relates_to": "相关洞察",
        "contributed_by": "贡献者",
        "applied_in": "应用场景",
        "derived_from": "来源",
        "supersedes": "替代旧知识"
    }
}
```

### 节点定义

| 节点类型 | 说明 | 示例 |
|---------|------|------|
| insight | 最小知识单元 | "顶级人才吸引的核心是使命,而非薪酬" |
| person | 人物档案 | 张博士、李总监 |
| project | 项目档案 | "烛龙量化2.0" |
| event | 活动档案 | "反共识沙龙#3" |
| concept | 概念定义 | "π型人才"、"蓝血文化" |

### 边关系定义

```python
RELATIONSHIP_TYPES = {
    "insight_to_insight": [
        "supports",      # A支持B
        "contradicts",   # A反对B
        "refines",       # A细化B
        "supersedes"     # A替代B
    ],
    "insight_to_person": [
        "authored",      # 某人创建
        "verified_by",   # 某人验证
        "applied_by"     # 某人应用
    ],
    "insight_to_project": [
        "applied_in",    # 在某项目应用
        "learned_from"   # 从某项目学到
    ]
}
```

---

## 知识沉淀流程

### 触发场景1:活动后24小时

```
反共识沙龙 / 失败复盘会 / 黑客松结束后
    ↓
稷下提取认知成果
    ├── 核心洞察(每条50字以内)
    ├── 关键引用(嘉宾/会员的原话)
    ├── 可执行建议(如果有)
    └── 无知区域(本次活动发现的新问题)
    ↓
创建insight节点 + 建立关系边
    ↓
同步到知识图谱
    ↓
通知相关Agent/会员(如果有关联)
```

### 触发场景2:项目复盘后

```
项目结束 → 天枢发起复盘 → 稷下协助沉淀
    ↓
提取:
    - 成功因素(为什么成功)
    - 失败教训(哪里做错)
    - 可复用方法(下次可用)
    - 认知盲区(我们不知道的)
    ↓
创建节点 + 建立项目关联
```

### 触发场景3:人才接触沉淀

```
每次与候选人接触后(无论成功与否)
    ↓
沉淀:
    - 候选人的关键洞察
    - 对军团有价值的信息
    - 接触学到的市场动态
    ↓
更新person节点 + 创建insight节点
```

---

## 输出格式

```yaml
insight_id: "INS-2026-0503-001"
content: "顶级人才的吸引,核心是'使命共鸣'而非'薪酬竞争'。候选人更看重'这件事是否有意义'。"
type: "recruiting_wisdom"
confidence: 0.88

source:
  type: "conversation"
  event_id: "沙龙#3"
  date: "2026-05-03"
  contributors: ["张博士", "李总监"]

relations:
  supports: ["INS-2026-0420-003"]  # 相关洞察
  related_people: ["张博士"]
  applied_in_projects: ["人才战略优化"]

tags:
  - talent_attraction
  - mission_driven
  - recruiting_wisdom

retrieval_hint: "想吸引顶级人才?先展示使命,而非薪酬"

next_review: "2026-08-03"  # 3个月后复看
```

---

## 检索接口

```python
def retrieve_knowledge(query, filters=None):
    """
    知识检索入口

    用法示例:
    retrieve_knowledge("人才吸引")
    retrieve_knowledge("量化", filters={"type": "insight", "min_confidence": 0.8})
    retrieve_knowledge("张博士相关洞察")
    """
    # 实现:基于关键词 + 向量相似度检索
    return ranked_results
```

### 检索结果示例

```
用户问:如何吸引量化领域的顶级人才?
稷下 → 知识图谱检索 → 返回:

相关洞察:
1. [INS-2026-0503-001] 顶级人才吸引核心是使命共鸣(置信度88%)
2. [INS-2026-0415-002] 量化人才更看重技术挑战深度(置信度82%)
3. [INS-2026-0401-008] Offer Package中AI副官是差异化价值(置信度91%)

相关人物:
- 张博士(量化专家,曾参与沙龙#2)

相关项目:
- 烛龙量化2.0(正在招聘量化PM)
```

---

## 踩坑记录

### 坑1:知识碎片化
- 问题:沉淀的知识太零散,无法形成系统
- 解决:每个insight必须包含"retrieval_hint"(用一句话能检索到)

### 坑2:沉淀延迟
- 问题:活动结束后没有及时沉淀,渐渐遗忘
- 解决:强制24小时沉淀流程,未完成则影响活动评分

### 坑3:检索效果差
- 问题:知识沉淀了,但检索不到
- 解决:每条insight必须有3个以上的标签,且有retrieval_hint

---

## 使用示例

```
用户:反共识沙龙#3结束,稷下进行知识沉淀
稷下:
1. 提取5条核心洞察
2. 记录3个关键引用
3. 提取2个可执行建议
4. 识别2个"无知区域"
5. 创建insight节点,建立关系边
6. 更新参与者person节点
7. 同步到知识图谱
8. 向相关Agent推送(如果有应用场景)
```

Attribution

aAAaqwqaAAaqwq
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from aAAaqwq →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

502942 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

953191 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

502941 votes

Last30days 2

Research any topic across Reddit, X/Twitter, and the web from the last 30 days. Synthesizes findings into actionable insights or copy-paste prompts.

6511 votes
View all in research →