Compares term sheets against market standards, identifies outliers
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill term-comparator --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Term Comparator?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/a5c-ai-term-comparator-babysitter)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: term-comparator
description: Compares term sheets against market standards, identifies outliers
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Glob
- Grep
- Bash
- WebFetch
metadata:
specialization: venture-capital
domain: business
skill-id: vc-skill-028
graph:
domains: [domain:venture-capital]
skillAreas: [skill-area:investment-analysis, skill-area:valuation-analysis, skill-area:financial-modeling]
roles: [role:financial-analyst]
---
# Term Comparator
## Overview
The Term Comparator skill analyzes term sheets against market standards and fund precedents to identify outliers and support negotiation strategy. It enables data-driven term negotiations and ensures consistency with market norms.
## Capabilities
### Market Standard Analysis
- Compare terms against market benchmarks
- Identify investor-favorable vs. founder-favorable terms
- Track market term evolution over time
- Analyze terms by stage and sector
### Precedent Comparison
- Compare against fund's historical terms
- Analyze co-investor standard terms
- Review competitor term patterns
- Build term precedent database
### Outlier Identification
- Flag unusual or non-standard provisions
- Identify terms outside normal ranges
- Highlight aggressive or founder-unfriendly terms
- Note missing standard protections
### Negotiation Support
- Suggest negotiation priorities
- Provide market data for negotiations
- Identify trade-off opportunities
- Model term package alternatives
## Usage
### Compare to Market
```
Input: Term sheet, market comparison parameters
Process: Analyze against benchmarks
Output: Market comparison report, variance analysis
```
### Compare to Precedent
```
Input: Term sheet, precedent set
Process: Compare against historical terms
Output: Precedent comparison, consistency analysis
```
### Identify Outliers
```
Input: Term sheet, outlier thresholds
Process: Flag unusual terms
Output: Outlier report, risk assessment
```
### Support Negotiation
```
Input: Current terms, priorities
Process: Analyze trade-offs, suggest approach
Output: Negotiation strategy, talking points
```
## Comparison Dimensions
| Dimension | Market Range | Notes |
|-----------|--------------|-------|
| Liquidation Preference | 1x non-participating standard | Participating increasingly rare |
| Anti-dilution | Broad-based weighted average | Full ratchet rare |
| Board Composition | Investor minority or balanced | Depends on stage |
| Protective Provisions | Standard set | Watch for unusual vetos |
| Option Pool | 10-15% refresh | Check pre vs. post |
## Integration Points
- **Term Sheet Drafting Process**: Validate generated terms
- **Definitive Document Negotiation**: Support doc negotiations
- **Term Sheet Generator**: Ensure generated terms are standard
- **Term Sheet Negotiator (Agent)**: Support agent negotiations
## Market Data Sources
- NVCA survey data
- Fund precedent database
- Co-investor term patterns
- Legal firm market reports
- Industry benchmarking services
## Best Practices
1. Maintain current market benchmark data
2. Consider stage and sector context
3. Weight precedent by recency
4. Distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves
5. Consider full term package, not just individual terms
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!