Skill for mechanism kinematics, dynamics, and motion analysis
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill mechanism-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mechanism Design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/a5c-ai-mechanism-design-babysitter)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mechanism-design
description: Skill for mechanism kinematics, dynamics, and motion analysis
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Glob
- Grep
- Bash
metadata:
specialization: mechanical-engineering
domain: science
category: mechanical-systems
priority: medium
phase: 8
tools-libraries:
- MSC ADAMS
- RecurDyn
- SolidWorks Motion
- MATLAB
graph:
domains: [domain:mechanical-engineering]
skillAreas: [skill-area:physics-simulation, skill-area:mathematical-reasoning, skill-area:motion-planning]
roles: [role:systems-integration-engineer, role:research-engineer]
---
# Mechanism Design Skill
## Purpose
The Mechanism Design skill provides capabilities for mechanism kinematics, dynamics, and motion analysis, enabling systematic design and optimization of mechanical motion systems.
## Capabilities
- Linkage synthesis and analysis
- Cam profile design
- Gear train design and analysis
- Kinematic simulation
- Dynamic force analysis
- Motion optimization
- ADAMS/RecurDyn integration
- Mechanism specification documentation
## Usage Guidelines
### Kinematic Analysis
#### Degrees of Freedom
```
Gruebler's Equation (planar):
DOF = 3(n-1) - 2j1 - j2
Where:
n = number of links (including ground)
j1 = number of full joints (pin, slider)
j2 = number of half joints (cam, gear)
DOF = 1: Constrained mechanism
DOF = 0: Structure
DOF < 0: Over-constrained
```
#### Common Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Links | Joints | DOF | Application |
|-----------|-------|--------|-----|-------------|
| Four-bar | 4 | 4 pins | 1 | Motion generation |
| Slider-crank | 4 | 3 pins + 1 slider | 1 | Reciprocating motion |
| Scotch yoke | 4 | 2 pins + 2 sliders | 1 | Exact sinusoidal |
| Quick return | 4 | 3 pins + 1 slider | 1 | Unequal stroke times |
| Geneva | 2 | Cam joint | Intermittent | Indexing |
### Linkage Design
#### Four-Bar Linkage Types
```
Grashof criterion:
s + l <= p + q
Where:
s = shortest link
l = longest link
p, q = intermediate links
If satisfied: At least one link can rotate fully
Types:
- Crank-rocker: Shortest link is crank
- Double-crank: Shortest link is ground
- Double-rocker: No full rotation
```
#### Position Analysis
```
Loop closure equation:
r2*e^(i*theta2) + r3*e^(i*theta3) - r4*e^(i*theta4) - r1 = 0
Solve for theta3, theta4 given theta2 (input)
Velocity:
omega3 = omega2 * r2 * sin(theta4-theta2) / (r3 * sin(theta4-theta3))
```
#### Transmission Angle
```
mu = angle between coupler and output link
Ideal: mu = 90 degrees
Acceptable: 40 < mu < 140 degrees
Poor: mu < 30 or mu > 150 degrees
```
### Cam Design
#### Cam Profile Types
| Type | Motion | Application |
|------|--------|-------------|
| Plate cam | Translating or oscillating follower | High speed |
| Cylindrical cam | Oscillating follower | Indexing |
| Face cam | Translating follower | Compact |
| Globoidal cam | Oscillating follower | High accuracy |
#### Motion Profiles
```
Common profiles:
1. Parabolic (constant acceleration)
s = (1/2) * a * t^2 for first half
Good: Simple, smooth
Bad: Infinite jerk at transition
2. Simple harmonic
s = (h/2) * (1 - cos(pi*t/T))
Good: Zero velocity at ends
Bad: Finite acceleration at ends
3. Cycloidal
s = h * (t/T - sin(2*pi*t/T)/(2*pi))
Good: Zero acceleration at ends
Bad: Higher peak acceleration
4. Modified trapezoid
Combines constant acceleration with transitions
Good: Low peak acceleration
Bad: More complex
```
#### Pressure Angle
```
tan(alpha) = (dy/dtheta) / (rb + y)
Where:
alpha = pressure angle
dy/dtheta = slope of displacement curve
rb = base circle radius
y = follower displacement
Limit: alpha < 30 degrees (typically)
```
### Gear Train Design
#### Gear Types
| Type | Application | Efficiency |
|------|-------------|------------|
| Spur | Parallel shafts | 98-99% |
| Helical | Parallel shafts, quieter | 97-99% |
| Bevel | Intersecting shafts | 97-98% |
| Worm | High ratio, non-reversing | 50-90% |
| Planetary | Compact, high ratio | 97-98% |
#### Gear Ratios
```
Simple gear train:
i = N2/N1 = omega1/omega2
Compound gear train:
i_total = product of individual ratios
Planetary gear train:
i = 1 + Nring/Nsun (sun fixed)
i = 1/(1 + Nsun/Nring) (ring fixed)
```
#### Gear Geometry
```
Module: m = d/N
Pitch: p = pi * m
Addendum: a = m
Dedendum: b = 1.25 * m
Center distance: C = m * (N1 + N2) / 2
Contact ratio:
CR = (Arc of action) / (Circular pitch)
Minimum CR > 1.2 recommended
```
### Dynamic Analysis
#### Force Analysis
```
Newton-Euler method:
Sum F = m * a_g (for each link)
Sum M_g = I_g * alpha (about mass center)
D'Alembert approach:
Add inertia forces: -m*a, -I*alpha
Solve as static equilibrium
```
#### Shaking Forces and Moments
```
Shaking force = -Sum(m_i * a_i)
Shaking moment = -Sum(I_i * alpha_i + r_i x m_i * a_i)
Balancing strategies:
1. Add counterweights
2. Optimize mass distribution
3. Use multiple cylinders (phase)
```
## Process Integration
- Cross-cutting for mechanical system design processes
## Input Schema
```json
{
"mechanism_type": "linkage|cam|gear|custom",
"motion_requirements": {
"input_motion": "rotation|translation",
"output_motion": "rotation|translation",
"motion_profile": "string or array",
"speed": "number (RPM or m/s)"
},
"constraints": {
"space_envelope": "object",
"force_requirements": "number",
"accuracy": "number"
},
"operating_conditions": {
"load": "number",
"speed_range": "array [min, max]",
"duty_cycle": "string"
}
}
```
## Output Schema
```json
{
"mechanism_design": {
"type": "string",
"configuration": "object",
"link_dimensions": "array"
},
"kinematic_results": {
"position_analysis": "array or function",
"velocity_analysis": "array or function",
"acceleration_analysis": "array or function",
"transmission_angle": "number"
},
"dynamic_results": {
"forces": "array",
"torques": "array",
"shaking_forces": "object"
},
"performance_metrics": {
"pressure_angle": "number (cams)",
"contact_ratio": "number (gears)",
"efficiency": "number"
},
"design_documentation": "reference"
}
```
## Best Practices
1. Start with kinematic requirements
2. Check Grashof criterion for linkages
3. Limit pressure angles in cams
4. Verify adequate contact ratio for gears
5. Analyze dynamics at operating speed
6. Consider balancing for high-speed mechanisms
## Integration Points
- Connects with CAD Modeling for geometry
- Feeds into FEA Structural for stress analysis
- Supports Test Planning for validation
- Integrates with Vibration Analysis for dynamics
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!