Byte-level Unicode homoglyph detection for identifying invisible character substitutions in code
Scanned 5/29/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill homoglyph-detector --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Homoglyph Detector?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/a5c-ai-homoglyph-detector)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: homoglyph-detector
description: Byte-level Unicode homoglyph detection for identifying invisible character substitutions in code
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Grep
---
# Homoglyph Detector
Byte-level forensic analysis of code changes to detect Unicode homoglyph substitutions — characters that look identical to ASCII in every editor and diff tool but have different codepoints, silently breaking string comparisons, dictionary lookups, and identifier resolution.
## Purpose
Homoglyph attacks (related to CVE-2021-42574 "Trojan Source") are the highest-stealth trojan technique. A Cyrillic `р` (U+0440) looks identical to a Latin `p` (U+0070) in every font, editor, and diff viewer. The only way to detect it is byte-level analysis via `hexdump`.
This skill pipes git diffs through `hexdump -C` and scans for multi-byte UTF-8 sequences where single-byte ASCII is expected, particularly in string literals used as dictionary keys, variable names, and identifiers.
## Capabilities
### Confusable Character Detection
Scans for these high-risk Unicode confusables:
| Latin | Cyrillic | Greek | UTF-8 Bytes |
|-------|----------|-------|-------------|
| a (61) | а (D0 B0) | α (CE B1) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| c (63) | с (D1 81) | — | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| e (65) | е (D0 B5) | ε (CE B5) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| o (6F) | о (D0 BE) | ο (CE BF) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| p (70) | р (D1 80) | ρ (CF 81) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| x (78) | х (D1 85) | χ (CF 87) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| y (79) | у (D1 83) | — | 1 vs 2 bytes |
### Zero-Width Character Detection
- U+200B — Zero-width space
- U+200C — Zero-width non-joiner
- U+200D — Zero-width joiner
- U+FEFF — Byte order mark (in non-BOM position)
### Bidi Control Character Detection (Trojan Source)
- U+200F — Right-to-left mark
- U+200E — Left-to-right mark
- U+202A — Left-to-right embedding
- U+202B — Right-to-left embedding
- U+202C — Pop directional formatting
- U+2066 — Left-to-right isolate
- U+2067 — Right-to-left isolate
### Context-Aware Analysis
- Focuses on **string literals** (dictionary keys, config values)
- Focuses on **identifiers** (variable names, function names, class names)
- Ignores legitimate Unicode in comments, docstrings, and i18n strings
- Compares byte patterns between removed (-) and added (+) diff lines
## Input Schema
```json
{
"type": "object",
"required": ["projectRoot", "changedFiles"],
"properties": {
"projectRoot": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Absolute path to the git repository"
},
"changedFiles": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"description": "List of changed file paths to scan"
},
"scanMode": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["uncommitted", "commit-range", "branch-diff"],
"default": "uncommitted"
},
"baseRef": { "type": "string" },
"headRef": { "type": "string" }
}
}
```
## Output Schema
```json
{
"type": "object",
"required": ["filesScanned", "homoglyphsFound", "verdict"],
"properties": {
"filesScanned": { "type": "number" },
"homoglyphsFound": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"file": { "type": "string" },
"line": { "type": "number" },
"byteOffset": { "type": "string" },
"context": { "type": "string" },
"expectedAscii": { "type": "string" },
"actualBytes": { "type": "string" },
"unicodeCodepoint": { "type": "string" },
"scriptName": { "type": "string" },
"impact": { "type": "string" }
}
}
},
"bidiControlChars": { "type": "array" },
"verdict": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["CLEAN", "HOMOGLYPH_DETECTED"]
}
}
}
```
## Detection Method
```bash
# Step 1: Pipe git diff through hexdump
git diff <file> | hexdump -C
# Step 2: In added (+) lines, look for multi-byte sequences
# where the removed (-) line had single-byte ASCII
#
# Example — Latin 'p' vs Cyrillic 'р':
# Removed: 22 70 70 67 22 | "ppg" | ← 70 = Latin 'p'
# Added: 22 d1 80 70 67 | "..pg" | ← d1 80 = Cyrillic 'р'
#
# The d1 80 bytes where 70 should be = HOMOGLYPH DETECTED
```
## Usage Example
```javascript
skill: {
name: 'homoglyph-detector',
context: {
projectRoot: '/path/to/project',
changedFiles: ['backend/app/prediction/temporal.py'],
scanMode: 'uncommitted'
}
}
```
## Real-World Example
From adversarial drill #6:
- **Attack**: Dictionary key `"ppg"` changed to `"рpg"` (Cyrillic р + Latin pg)
- **Camouflage**: 4 lines of harmless `round()` wrappers added as decoy
- **Impact**: All `dict.get("ppg")` lookups return default `0`, disabling trend detection
- **Detection**: `hexdump -C` revealed bytes `d1 80` where `70` was expected
## Process Files
- `nation-state-trojan-detection.js` — Phase 2: Homoglyph Detection (parallel with semantic analysis)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!