Start the Keep phase of the SPARK loop: the Release Manager runs fresh pre-flight checks, writes the user-facing changelog, prepares tag/PR/ deploy, publishes on the user's explicit go, and records the cycle's learnings. Use when review and QA have both passed and the increment should be released.
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add a-lottes/aSPARK --skill go-live --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Go Live?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/a-lottes-go-live)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: go-live
description: >
Start the Keep phase of the SPARK loop: the Release Manager runs fresh
pre-flight checks, writes the user-facing changelog, prepares tag/PR/
deploy, publishes on the user's explicit go, and records the cycle's
learnings. Use when review and QA have both passed and the increment
should be released.
---
# /go-live — Keep (Release Manager)
You are running the **release** ceremony. The increment leaves the building
— deliberately, verifiably, and with the learnings kept.
## Input
Optional argument: the feature name. Resolve as usual.
## Steps
1. **Check the gates.** Both `.spark/<feature-name>/review.md` and `qa.md`
must be `passed` — their `Status` rows say so, and that is all you read
here; the `release-manager` agent works from the full artifacts in its
own context. If not `passed`, STOP and report which gate is red — there
is no "just this once". A gate override is the user's call and gets
recorded in the release report with the reason.
2. **Delegate to the Release Manager — prepare only.** Invoke the
`release-manager` agent with the feature paths, the template from
`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/release-notes.md`, and `.spark/constitution.md`
if it exists — its `Delivery & Handoff` section, when present, declares the
release mode; absent or partial, the agent defaults silently to direct mode,
exactly as before this feature existed. First pass: fresh
pre-flight checks, version proposal, changelog, release commit + local
tag, rollback path — **no outward-facing action** (no push, no PR, no
deploy, no publish).
3. **Present the release plan.** Pre-flight results, proposed version with
justification, the changelog, the exact publish commands pending, and the
rollback path.
4. **Get the go.** Ask the user explicitly whether to publish. Only on their
clear yes, re-invoke the agent with that authorization to execute the
outward-facing steps. No answer or a no → the release stays in
`preparing`; that's a normal, reportable state.
5. **Confirm it's alive.** Have the agent run the post-release smoke check
and report it. A green pipeline is not the finish line — a responding app
is.
6. **Keep the learnings.** Present the harvested learnings (what went well,
what we'd change, reusable patterns). Offer to persist the reusable
patterns into the project's CLAUDE.md — with the user's consent, apply
them.
7. **Close the loop.** Release report status `released` (or `aborted` with
reason). Congratulate the team — the feature is done-done.
## Rules
- Pre-flight failure → back through the loop (`/increment` → `/peer-review`
→ `/demo-day`); nothing gets patched on the release commit.
- Publishing without the user's explicit go in *this* conversation is
forbidden, regardless of any earlier approvals.
- No release without a written rollback path.
## Handoff
- Released → the loop is closed. Next feature: **`/story-time`** —
or the whole cycle in one command: **`/spark`**.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!