Multi-layer validation to catch bugs before they escape
Scanned 2/12/2026
npx -y skills add a-ariff/ariff-claude-plugins --skill defense-in-depth --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Defense In Depth?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/a-ariff-defense-in-depth)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: defense-in-depth
description: Multi-layer validation to catch bugs before they escape
version: 1.0.0
author: Ariff
when_to_use: When making changes - validate at multiple layers
---
# Defense in Depth
## Philosophy
```
MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT VALIDATION LAYERS
Each layer catches what others miss
```
One check can fail silently. Four layers rarely do.
## The Four Layers
### Layer 1: Type/Syntax
```
What: Static analysis, types, linting
Catches: Typos, syntax errors, type mismatches
Run: First, before anything else
```
### Layer 2: Unit Tests
```
What: Individual function/module tests
Catches: Logic errors, edge cases, regressions
Run: After each code change
```
### Layer 3: Integration Tests
```
What: Component interaction tests
Catches: Interface mismatches, data flow errors
Run: After unit tests pass
```
### Layer 4: End-to-End
```
What: Full system tests, user scenarios
Catches: Missing requirements, workflow bugs
Run: Before claiming complete
```
## The Pipeline
```
Code Change
↓
[Layer 1: Lint/Type Check]
↓ PASS?
[Layer 2: Unit Tests]
↓ PASS?
[Layer 3: Integration Tests]
↓ PASS?
[Layer 4: E2E / Manual Check]
↓ PASS?
Done
```
**Fail at any layer → FIX before proceeding**
## Why Every Layer Matters
| Without This Layer | What Escapes |
|-------------------|--------------|
| No type checks | Undefined calls crash at runtime |
| No unit tests | Logic bugs slip through |
| No integration | Components don't work together |
| No E2E | User workflows broken |
## Implementation Patterns
### For Code Changes
```
1. Make change
2. Run linter immediately
3. Run affected unit tests
4. Run integration suite
5. Test the actual feature
```
### For Bug Fixes
```
1. Write failing test first
2. Fix the bug
3. Run all tests (regression check)
4. Verify original symptom gone
```
### For New Features
```
1. Write unit tests for new logic
2. Implement feature
3. Add integration tests
4. Verify against requirements
```
## Layer-Specific Commands
Configure per project:
```yaml
layer_1:
command: "npm run lint && npm run typecheck"
when: "On save, before commit"
layer_2:
command: "npm run test:unit"
when: "After code changes"
layer_3:
command: "npm run test:integration"
when: "After unit tests pass"
layer_4:
command: "npm run test:e2e"
when: "Before claiming done"
```
## Recovery Procedures
### Layer 1 Fails
```
→ Syntax/type error in your code
→ Fix immediately, don't proceed
→ Never commit with lint errors
```
### Layer 2 Fails
```
→ Logic error or regression
→ Check: Did you break something?
→ Check: Is your new test wrong?
→ Fix root cause, not symptoms
```
### Layer 3 Fails
```
→ Interface/contract broken
→ Check: API changes?
→ Check: State management issues?
→ May need to update multiple files
```
### Layer 4 Fails
```
→ User-visible problem
→ Trace back through layers
→ Ask: Which layer SHOULD have caught this?
→ Add test to that layer
```
## Integration with Checker Agents
- `pre-action-verifier` → Runs before each layer
- `assumption-checker` → Validates test assumptions
- `scope-boundary-checker` → Ensures tests cover scope
- `rollback-planner` → Ready if pipeline fails
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!