Develop and test the Codevisor iOS app with Xcode and the iOS Simulator. Use when working on iOS code, launching or interacting with the simulator, inspecting the running iOS app, debugging simulator behavior, or verifying an iOS change.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
Skills Directorynpx -y skills add 851-labs/codevisor --skill ios-development --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ios Development?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/851-labs-ios-development)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ios-development
description: Develop and test the Codevisor iOS app with Xcode and the iOS Simulator. Use when working on iOS code, launching or interacting with the simulator, inspecting the running iOS app, debugging simulator behavior, or verifying an iOS change.
---
# iOS Development
Open the iOS project in Xcode before trying to use Xcode's MCP tools. From the worktree root, run:
```sh
xed apps/ios/Codevisor.xcodeproj
```
Wait for Xcode to open and load the project. Then prefer the Xcode MCP for building, running, inspecting, and driving the app in the iOS Simulator.
Keep simulator work in the Xcode MCP instead of trying several overlapping tools. Do not start with `xcrun simctl`, direct `xcodebuild` commands, generic computer-use automation, or separate screenshot/accessibility tools when the Xcode MCP can perform the operation.
Use another tool only when the Xcode MCP is unavailable or lacks the required capability. Keep any fallback narrow, and state why it is needed before using it.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
