Claude Skills by yogsoth-ai

Systematically extract performance data and conditions from papers — 30 methods, 150 data points, 40 web searches budget

Assemble unified comparison table with confidence interval annotations

Build a detailed adversarial persona with background, motivation, expertise, blind spots, and preferred attack patterns.

Empathic identification — become the system/component. First-person embodiment to discover hidden constraints and opportunities.

First-person empathic identification with a system or component. Produces experience description and design insights from embodiment.

Define distinct stakeholder or analytical perspectives with their values, concerns, and evaluation criteria.

Attack a decision from a specific assigned perspective, producing rated arguments and constructive alternatives.

Evaluates artifact from a specific assigned perspective. Produces assessment grounded in that viewpoint's values, priorities, and expertise.

Perspective Forcing Campaign — discover hidden solutions by systematically switching viewpoints via roles, six hats, temporal projection, and constraint injection

Rotate through reviewer/practitioner/theorist/time-machine/novice perspectives systematically. Ensures comprehensive viewpoint coverage.

Synthesize all perspective outputs into a structured multi-perspective idea report.

SOP: 应用 PICO/PICOTS 框架结构化研究问题

Construct PICO/PECO framework for the meta-analysis research question

Format task plan as bite-sized executable tasks following superpowers:writing-plans conventions

Format critical path and prerequisites into bite-sized executable plan following superpowers:writing-plans conventions

SOP: 对候选解释按合理性进行多维度加权排序

Generate PO (Provocative Operation) statements per de Bono's lateral thinking. Creates deliberately illogical provocations to escape dominant thinking patterns.

Map unresolvable tensions as Johnson polarities — 4 quadrants (positive/negative of each pole), early warnings, action steps for managing rather than solving.

Evaluate a specific portfolio's performance metrics and vulnerabilities under a given scenario.

Strategy: gap 组合视为投资组合——用风险/收益/多样性优化选出最优 gap 组合

Synthesize all per-scenario evaluations into a final portfolio recommendation with robustness score and actionable guidance.

Engineer perspective — assess buildability, cost, timeline, and integration challenges.

Execute Klein pre-mortem protocol — assume failure has occurred, generate plausible failure scenarios through prospective hindsight.

Tactic: Pre-mortem rapid screening feeds high-risk items into full FMEA analysis. Bridges fast intuitive generation with systematic structured analysis.

Identify obstacles blocking direct achievement and design intermediate objectives to overcome each

Present the field panorama to the user and gather their preferences — which fields interest them, which they reject, and why. A dialogue SOP that bridges landscape-synthesis output to user decision.

Analyze sub-directions within the user's chosen field and present ranked candidates. Combines sub-direction identification, skill-gap matching, and presentation into a single SOP. Depth scales by start mode: cold-start shows broad sub-directions, warm-start shows specific sub-problems, hot-start shows granular technical details.

Evaluate novelty of specific invention — find relevant prior art across patents, publications, and products. Budget: 80 patent families, 20 claim parses, 50 web searches.

Multi-dimensional gap scoring and ranking — define criteria, score, weight, rank, sensitivity-check. Combines multi-criteria-scoring, stakeholder-confirmation, and feasibility assessment.

Tactic: 扰动评分权重，检验 gap 排序对权重选择的稳健性

SOP: 综合所有评分数据产出最终 gap 优先级列表及攻击路径建议

Generate PRISMA-compliant flow data documenting the screening funnel — counts at each stage (identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion) with exclusion reasons. Used by systematic-survey via prisma-screening tactic.

Multi-stage PRISMA screening tactic — progressively filter papers from a large candidate pool to a focused set for deep reading. Four stages (identification, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, inclusion) with documented counts at each stage.

Execute a single attack probe against an artifact, record the result with evidence and severity classification.

Restate technical problem as biological question. Translate engineering challenges into nature's language.

Problem Reformulation Campaign — question the problem itself. Escape dominant ideas, reframe from multiple perspectives, apply dialectical inquiry, assess wickedness, discover appreciative alternatives. 5 strategies, 3 tactics, 10 subagent SOPs.

Strategy: Research execution process FMEA — analyzes how the research process itself can fail during execution, distinct from design-level failures.

Build performance-over-time progress curves with inflection detection

Construct performance-over-time visualization data

Track performance progress over time, quantify remaining headroom — 30 methods, 100 data points, 40 web searches budget

Propose concrete mitigation strategies for severe obstacles. MUST use search tools to validate that proposed mitigations are realistic — no armchair theorizing. Each mitigation must have evidence of feasibility.

Strategy: Klein pre-mortem — assume the artifact has failed, then retrospect plausible causes. Generates rapid failure scenario catalog.

Extract evaluation protocol parameters from papers

Analyze evaluation protocol differences across papers for same benchmark — 5 benchmarks, 60 papers, 30 web searches

PO + Movement: generate provocations then extract useful directions (4 movement types)

Generate de Bono lateral thinking provocations to challenge dominant ideas using escape, reversal, exaggeration, and distortion.

Plan funnel plots, Egger's test, trim-and-fill, p-curve, and selection model analyses for publication bias

Methodological quality and bias risk assessment of included studies using validated tools

Methodological rigor scoring for papers — evaluates bias risk, reproducibility, sample adequacy using established frameworks. Used by systematic-survey.

Shared SOP: 通用质量门检查（格式完整性、逻辑一致性）