Claude Skills by yha9806

Build and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map, evidence-fit or over/under-balance checks, analysis admission, contribution prioritisation, innovation-evidence checks, or a decision about whether the current emphasis should change; als...

Use when checking a thesis draft before submission for inconsistent numbers, terminology, cross-references, or citation problems.

Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate records, unpublished work, and unsupported claims must be kept separate.

Convert thesis chapters and reading notes from Markdown to Word (.docx) and package for submission. Use when preparing materials for supervisors or examiners.

Use when validating, repairing, or mapping human-evaluation handoff packages, filled annotation CSVs, rebuttal annotation UIs, or reviewer annotation returns across package versions. Applies to checking row alignment, detecting cross-snapshot contamination, converting old labels to current schemas, generating refill/import CSVs, and deciding whether filled annotations are safe for formal aggregation.

Map reading notes to thesis chapters and integrate key arguments into the manuscript. Use after completing a reading session to weave new material into the thesis.

Review stable chapter or manuscript drafts for paragraph flow, transitions, argument continuity, and repeated rhetorical functions before editing. Use after the author-approved spine is stable; route structural drift back to thesis-control.

Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.

Show or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage.

Record reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.

Review another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.

Show reading and writing progress dashboard — how many sources read, chapters completed, word counts, and coverage gaps.

Read PDF page by page with structured output — key arguments, terms glossary, thesis connections. Use when reading academic papers, books, or articles.

Use when preparing, auditing, releasing, PDF-hardening, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, agent-assisted drafts, wide tables, figure provenance, submission PDFs, or evidence-boundary checks.

Stop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.

Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory and unstated context must not become evidence.

Check thesis text for British English consistency and safe mechanical spelling fixes.

Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.

Use when checking BibTeX reference records for missing fields, malformed identifiers, duplicate keys, or metadata mismatches before submission.

Fact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.

Build and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map, evidence-fit or over/under-balance checks, analysis admission, contribution prioritisation, innovation-evidence checks, or a decision about whether the current emphasis should change; als...

Use when checking a thesis draft before submission for inconsistent numbers, terminology, cross-references, or citation problems.

Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate records, unpublished work, and unsupported claims must be kept separate.

Convert thesis chapters and reading notes from Markdown to Word (.docx) and package for submission. Use when preparing materials for supervisors or examiners.

Use when validating, repairing, or mapping human-evaluation handoff packages, filled annotation CSVs, rebuttal annotation UIs, or reviewer annotation returns across package versions. Applies to checking row alignment, detecting cross-snapshot contamination, converting old labels to current schemas, generating refill/import CSVs, and deciding whether filled annotations are safe for formal aggregation.

Map reading notes to thesis chapters and integrate key arguments into the manuscript. Use after completing a reading session to weave new material into the thesis.

Review stable chapter or manuscript drafts for paragraph flow, transitions, argument continuity, and repeated rhetorical functions before editing. Use after the author-approved spine is stable; route structural drift back to thesis-control.

Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.

Show or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage.

Record reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.

Review another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.

Show reading and writing progress dashboard — how many sources read, chapters completed, word counts, and coverage gaps.

Read PDF page by page with structured output — key arguments, terms glossary, thesis connections. Use when reading academic papers, books, or articles.

Use when preparing, auditing, releasing, PDF-hardening, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, agent-assisted drafts, wide tables, figure provenance, submission PDFs, or evidence-boundary checks.

Stop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.

Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory and unstated context must not become evidence.

Check thesis text for British English consistency and safe mechanical spelling fixes.

Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.

Use when checking BibTeX reference records for missing fields, malformed identifiers, duplicate keys, or metadata mismatches before submission.

Fact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.