All authors
Claude Skills by yha9806
github.com/yha980622 skills1 installs47 views
- AuditCheck thesis chapters for consistency before submission — contradictory numbers, terminology drift, and broken cross-references — and read every rewritten or proposed sentence against the one it replaces before anyone sees the rewrite.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- ExportConvert thesis chapters and reading notes from Markdown to Word (.docx) and package for submission. Use when preparing materials for supervisors or examiners.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Human Eval Handoff RepairUse when validating, repairing, or mapping human-evaluation handoff packages, filled annotation CSVs, rebuttal annotation UIs, or reviewer annotation returns across package versions. Applies to checking row alignment, detecting cross-snapshot contamination, converting old labels to current schemas, generating refill/import CSVs, and deciding whether filled annotations are safe for formal aggregation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- IntegrateMap reading notes to thesis chapters and integrate key arguments into the manuscript. Use after completing a reading session to weave new material into the thesis.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Logic ReviewReview stable chapter or manuscript drafts for paragraph flow, transitions, argument continuity, and repeated rhetorical functions before editing. Use after the author-approved spine is stable; route structural drift back to thesis-control.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Manuscript ReframeReframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- NoteRecord reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Peer ReviewReview another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- ReadRead PDF page by page with structured output — key arguments, terms glossary, thesis connections. Use when reading academic papers, books, or articles.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Release GovernanceUse when preparing, auditing, releasing, PDF-hardening, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, agent-assisted drafts, wide tables, figure provenance, submission PDFs, or evidence-boundary checks.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Revision EscalationStop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- StyleCheck thesis text for British English consistency and safe mechanical spelling fixes.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Thesis ControlUse when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- ReadersOpen a reader panel. Instruction-bound amnesiac sub-agents read the abstract or introduction and report what they carried away, set against the author's intended points. Use when those sections change or the writing loop marks the panel stale.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 42
- Argument GovernanceBuild and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map, evidence-fit or over/under-balance checks, analysis admission, contribution prioritisation, innovation-evidence checks, or a decision about whether the current emphasis should change; als...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41
- Evidence ReviewBuild evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate records, unpublished work, and unsupported claims must be kept separate.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41
- MapShow literature-to-chapter coverage and the writing progress dashboard — which sources support which chapters, and word counts against targets.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41
- ProgressShow reading and writing progress dashboard — how many sources read, chapters completed, word counts, and coverage gaps.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41
- Self ReviewReview the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory and unstated context must not become evidence.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41
- Verify RefsUse when checking BibTeX reference records for missing fields, malformed identifiers, duplicate keys, or metadata mismatches before submission.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41
- VerifyFact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41
- ReviewReview a manuscript or chapter as an external reviewer, or run an own-work self-review in a fresh-context clean room, producing anchored findings and a recommendation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 41