Claude Skills by tobihagemann

For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to \"answer reviewer questions\", \"draft answers to PR questions\", or \"explain reviewer questions\".

Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to \"apply findings\", \"apply fixes\", \"apply suggestions\", \"apply accepted findings\", \"fix the findings\", or \"apply the review results\".

Project-wide health audit pipeline that fans out to all analysis skills in parallel, evaluates findings, and produces a unified report at .turbo/audit.md. Use when the user asks to \"audit the project\", \"run a full audit\", \"project health check\", \"audit my code\", \"codebase audit\", or \"comprehensive review\".

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.

Enforce mirror, reuse, and symmetry principles to keep new code consistent with surrounding code. Use when writing new code in an existing codebase, adding new features, refactoring, or making any code changes.

Run autonomous task execution using the codex CLI. Use when the user asks to \"codex exec\", \"run codex exec\", \"execute a task with codex\", or \"delegate to codex\".

Run AI-powered code review using the codex CLI. Use when the user asks to \"codex review\", \"run codex review\", or \"review a commit with codex\".

Shared commit message rules and technical constraints referenced by /stage-commit and /commit-staged. Not typically invoked directly.

Commit already-staged changes and push in one step. Use when the user asks to \"commit and push staged changes\", \"commit and push what's staged\", or \"commit staged and push\".

Commit already-staged changes with a message matching existing commit style. Use when the user asks to \"commit staged changes\" or \"commit what's staged\".

Multi-turn consultation with Codex CLI for second opinions, brainstorming, or collaborative problem-solving. Use when the user asks to \"consult codex\", \"ask codex\", \"get codex's opinion\", \"brainstorm with codex\", \"discuss with codex\", or \"chat with codex\".

Consult ChatGPT Pro via ChatGPT browser automation for problems that resist standard approaches. Use when stuck on a very hard problem, when standard approaches have failed, when multiple debugging attempts haven't worked, or when the user says \"ask the oracle\", \"consult oracle\", \"consult chatgpt\", \"I'm completely stuck\", \"I've tried everything\", or \"nothing is working\".

Submit turbo skill improvements back to the upstream repo. Adapts to repo mode: fork mode creates a PR, source mode pushes directly. Use when the user asks to \"contribute to turbo\", \"submit turbo changes\", \"PR my skill changes\", \"contribute back\", or \"upstream my changes\".

Create a CHANGELOG.md following keepachangelog.com conventions with version history backfilled from GitHub releases or git tags. Use when the user asks to \"create a changelog\", \"add a changelog\", \"initialize changelog\", \"start a changelog\", \"set up changelog\", \"generate changelog\", or \"backfill changelog\".

Write a handoff file at .turbo/handoff/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md capturing current session state — task, status, open decisions, in-flight changes, next step — so a fresh session can continue without re-deriving context. Use when the user asks to \"create a handoff\", \"create handoff\", \"save handoff\", \"handoff before compact\", \"save session state\", \"handoff for next session\", or \"capture session state\".

Create a GitHub pull request with a drafted title and description. Use when the user asks to \"create a PR\", \"create a pull request\", \"open a PR\", or \"submit a PR\".

Scans an existing codebase and generates project-specific skills that capture inferred conventions such as naming, file organization, framework usage, data access, error handling, and testing style. Writes into the project's chosen skill directory (e.g., `.claude/skills/`, `.agents/skills/`, or a custom path). Use when the user asks to \"extract skills from the codebase\", \"create project skills\", \"infer project conventions as skills\", \"codify patterns as skills\", or \"mine the repo for...

Create a new skill or update an existing skill that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. Use when the user asks to \"create a skill\", \"make a new skill\", \"build a skill\", \"scaffold a skill\", \"write a skill for...\", or \"new skill that does...\".

Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plan.md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to \"create a test plan\", \"plan tests\", \"what should I test\", \"generate test scenarios\", \"test plan for this PR\", or \"what are the test cases\".

Analyze a codebase and produce a structured threat model at .turbo/threat-model.md covering assets, trust boundaries, attack surfaces with existing mitigations, attacker stories, and calibrated severity. Use when the user asks to \"create a threat model\", \"threat model\", \"threat model this codebase\", \"security analysis\", \"analyze the attack surface\", \"what are the threats\", or \"identify security risks\".

Produce an implementation plan at .turbo/plans/<slug>.md. Use when the user asks to \"draft a plan\", \"draft the plan\", \"write an implementation plan\", \"plan this change\", \"create an implementation plan\", or needs a first-draft plan file before refinement.

Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to \"evaluate findings\", \"assess review comments\", \"triage review feedback\", \"evaluate review output\", or \"filter false positives\".

Explain whatever the user is pointing at right now in plain language: a pending question, a piece of code, an error, a command output, or an artifact like a plan or findings report. Use when the user asks to \"explain this\", \"what am I being asked\", \"what's happening right now\", \"help me understand this\", \"what does this mean\", \"what does this error mean\", \"what is this code doing\", or \"what do these options mean\".

Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Deeper than /smoke-test. Use when the user asks to \"exploratory test\", \"test thoroughly\", \"test all scenarios\", \"deep test\", \"test edge cases\", \"test everything\", \"break it\", or \"find bugs by testing\".

Fetch and summarize review feedback and conversation from a GitHub PR (unresolved review threads, review bodies, and PR conversation comments) without making changes. Use when the user asks to \"fetch PR comments\", \"show PR comments\", \"check PR for unresolved comments\", \"list review comments\", \"what comments are on the PR\", \"show unresolved threads\", or \"summarize PR feedback\".

Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to \"finalize implementation\", \"finalize changes\", \"wrap up implementation\", \"finish up\", \"ready to commit\", or \"run QA workflow\".

Find dead code using parallel subagent analysis and optional CLI tools, treating code only referenced from tests as dead. Use when the user asks to \"find dead code\", \"find unused code\", \"find unused exports\", \"find unreferenced functions\", \"clean up dead code\", or \"what code is unused\". Analysis-only — does not modify or delete code.

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user asks to build landing pages, websites, dashboards, web components, or any frontend UI. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

Shared writing style rules for GitHub-facing output (PR comments, PR descriptions, PR titles). Differentiates insider vs outsider voice based on author association. Not typically invoked directly — loaded by other skills before composing GitHub text.

Validate improvements from .turbo/improvements.md, recommend a working set tailored to what's in the backlog, and run one lane: direct fixes, investigation, or planned work. One lane per session. Use when the user asks to \"implement improvements\", \"work on improvements\", \"address improvements\", \"process improvement backlog\", \"tackle improvements\", or \"implement noted improvements\".

Execute an implementation plan file produced by /draft-plan, /turboplan, or /expand-shell. Runs pre-implementation prep, then runs /implement to execute the steps and finalize. Use when the user asks to \"implement plan\", \"implement the plan\", \"execute the plan\", \"run the plan\", \"implement plans/<slug>.md\", \"start implementing the plan\", or starts a fresh session to implement a previously drafted plan.

Load code-style and task-specific skills, make the change described by the current context, then run /finalize for QA and commit. Use for ad-hoc changes when no plan file or improvements backlog governs the work, and when the user asks to \"just implement\", \"implement directly\", \"implement without a plan\", or \"apply the change\".

Interpret third-party feedback by running parallel internal and peer interpretations to surface intent, correctness concerns, and ambiguities. Use when the user asks to \"interpret feedback\", \"interpret comments\", \"what does this feedback mean\", \"clarify reviewer intent\", \"understand this review\", or \"interpret these suggestions\".

Systematically investigate bugs, test failures, build errors, performance issues, or unexpected behavior by cycling through characterize-isolate-hypothesize-test steps. Use when the user asks to \"investigate this bug\", \"debug this\", \"figure out why this fails\", \"find the root cause\", \"why is this broken\", \"troubleshoot this\", \"diagnose the issue\", \"what's causing this error\", \"look into this failure\", \"why is this test failing\", or \"track down this bug\".

Deep architecture report that fans out parallel inspections across different aspects of the codebase (structure, tech stack, APIs, patterns, data flow, dependencies, testing) and synthesizes findings into a comprehensive document at .turbo/codebase-map.md and .turbo/codebase-map.html. Use when the user asks to \"map the codebase\", \"map codebase\", \"architecture report\", \"codebase overview\", \"architecture overview\", \"what am I looking at\", or \"explain this codebase\".

Capture an out-of-scope improvement opportunity so it doesn't get lost. Use when the user asks to \"note improvement\", \"save improvement\", \"track this for later\", \"remember this improvement\", \"note this idea\", \"log improvement\", \"backlog this\", or \"park this idea\". Also invoke proactively when noticing something improvable during work that falls outside the current task's scope — briefly mention it to the user and offer to note it.

Developer onboarding guide that composes architecture mapping, tooling review, and agentic setup review with setup, troubleshooting, and next-steps agents to produce a comprehensive guide at .turbo/onboarding.md and .turbo/onboarding.html. Use when the user asks to \"onboard me\", \"onboard to this project\", \"generate onboarding guide\", \"new developer guide\", \"how do I get started\", or \"help me ramp up\".

Run an independent peer review via Codex. Use when the user asks to \"peer review\", \"peer review my code\", \"peer review my plan\", \"peer review my spec\", \"peer review my shells\", \"get a second opinion\", or \"independent review\".

Fetch and rank open GitHub issues by community engagement, present the top 3 candidates, and plan implementation for the selected issue. Use when the user asks to \"pick next issue\", \"next issue\", \"which issue should I work on\", \"top issues\", \"most popular issues\", \"prioritize issues\", or \"what should I work on next\".

Stage, format, lint, test, review, smoke test, and re-run itself until stable. Use when the user asks to \"polish code\", \"refine code\", \"iterate on code quality\", \"review loop\", \"clean up, test, and review loop\", or \"run the polish loop\".

Recall the reasoning behind a past change by locating the Claude Code transcript that produced it. Use when the user asks to \"recall reasoning\", \"find reasoning\", \"look up reasoning\", \"recall implementation reasoning\", \"find the rationale\", \"why did I do X\", \"recall from transcripts\", or \"find the transcript for this commit\".

Iteratively review and revise a planning artifact until no new findings survive evaluation. Supports plans, shells, and specs. Use when the user asks to \"refine the plan\", \"refine the shells\", \"refine this spec\", \"iterate on the plan\", \"iterate on the shells\", \"tighten the plan\", \"tighten the shells\", \"tighten the spec\", \"improve the plan\", \"improve the shells\", or \"improve the spec\".

Draft, confirm, and post a single conversational reply to GitHub PR conversation comments (issue comments). The reply addresses all tracked items in one natural-prose message. Use when the user asks to \"reply to PR conversation\", \"post PR conversation replies\", or \"draft PR conversation messages\".

Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to \"reply to PR threads\", \"post PR thread replies\", or \"draft PR reply messages\".

Choose an implementation path (direct or plan) for evaluated findings and dispatch it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs /turboplan. Use after /evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to \"resolve findings\", \"apply evaluated findings\", or \"dispatch findings to implementation\".

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to \"resolve PR comments\", \"fix review comments\", \"address PR feedback\", \"handle review comments\", \"address review feedback\", \"respond to PR comments\", \"answer review questions\", or \"address code review\".

Detect agentic coding infrastructure in a project: CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, installed skills, MCP servers, hooks, and cross-tool compatibility (Claude Code and Codex CLI). Returns structured findings about agentic readiness without applying changes. Use when the user asks to \"review agentic setup\", \"check agentic setup\", \"agentic readiness\", \"is this project set up for AI coding\", or \"review AI coding setup\".

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to \"review my code\", \"full code review\", \"review my changes\", \"check for bugs\", \"scan for bugs\", \"review correctness\", \"security audit\", \"find vulnerabilities\", \"review secu...

Detect package managers and discover outdated or vulnerable dependencies. Returns structured findings without upgrading. Use when the user asks to \"review dependencies\", \"check for outdated packages\", \"check dependencies\", \"scan dependencies\", or \"dependency review\".

Review a planning artifact (plan, shells, or spec) by running internal and peer reviews in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to \"review my plan\", \"review my shells\", \"review my spec\", \"check my plan\", \"check my shells\", \"check my spec\", \"critique my plan\", \"critique my shells\", \"critique my spec\", or wants feedback on a planning artifact.