Claude Skills by thedixitjain

Use when a PR or feature needs both specification and code-quality review

Show where you are in the workflow and what to do next — use for progress checks and orientation

Brainstorm creatively with pattern spotting and paradox hunting — use for ideation and exploration

Upgrade any skill to v5 Hybrid format using decision theory + modal logic

Use when about to declare work complete, fixed, passing, or done

Use when a nontrivial change needs end-to-end verification before committing or shipping

Codify the most recent successful /scrape flow into a permanent browser-skill on disk. (gstack)

../../../engineering/skillopt-sleep/skills/skillopt-sleep/SKILL.md

../../../c-level-advisor/arquiteto-de-empresa/skills/arquiteto-de-empresa/SKILL.md

../../../c-level-advisor/chief-customer-officer-advisor/skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/SKILL.md

Evaluate Claude skill quality through auditing. Use when reviewing or auditing skills.

../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/skills/feature-flags-architect/SKILL.md

../../../c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor/SKILL.md

../../../c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/skills/vpe-advisor/SKILL.md

Analyze skin health data, identify skin problem patterns, assess skin health status. Supports correlation analysis with nutrition, chronic diseases, and medication data.

分析睡眠数据、识别睡眠模式、评估睡眠质量，并提供个性化睡眠改善建议。支持与其他健康数据的关联分析。

>- Trigger when you would normally reach for pytest, gh, mypy, black, or other raw repo tooling. Redirect to `sm swab`, `sm scour`, `sm buff`, `sm sail`, `sm refit`, or `sm doctor` so remediation follows the established rails. Also trigger when filing issues about slop-mop friction — use `sm barnacle file` / `/slopmop:sm-barnacle`, never `gh issue create`.

Use when drafting an ACM SoCC author response (rebuttal) during a round's response window, covering the single written turn, answering both the systems and the data/measurement reviewer, supplying the tail-latency and cost numbers reviewers ask for, staying within dual anonymity, and the fact that SoCC has no Major-Revision round to fall back on.

One sentence - what this skill does and when to invoke it

Use to extract concepts or mechanisms from empirical materials for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — naming a phenomenon, defining it, bounding it, and moving back and forth between materials and sociological theory. Use especially for qualitative work that risks staying at the level of description.

Use to build a sociological problem consciousness (问题意识) for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — turning a variable relationship or a pile of fieldwork into a question about how a social mechanism, structure, or process works. Use when the manuscript still reads as \"X affects Y\" without a sociological stake.

Use to draft the response letter for an R&R at 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — addressing reviewer concerns about sociological problematic, theory dialogue, mechanism/social process, qualitative trustworthiness, or quantitative interpretation, point by point, with respect and evidence. Use only after the manuscript itself has been revised.

Use when polishing the language of a 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) manuscript — removing both policy-report tone (加强/完善/推进) and pure-technique tone (method-flexing), and restoring a scholarly sociological register with paragraph-leading topic sentences. Use after the problematic and mechanism are settled.

Use when deciding which soctheory-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a Sociological Theory manuscript from theoretical-problem framing through peer-review revision for a Sociological Theory (ST) submission. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when reasoning about how a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) submission is evaluated — the per-edition program committee under joint ACM-SIAM sponsorship, HotCRP triage of a record-size submission pool, lightweight double-blind refereeing of full versions, the September rebuttal, and October decisions.

Use when preparing or auditing a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) submission — the no-page-limit full-version norm, the title-page abstract, 11-point single-column letter format, lightweight double-blind rules, HotCRP entry, and the July AoE deadline with its summary-rejection triggers.

> Activate this skill for ANY future-oriented question. Triggers include: \"Will [X]?\", \"Who will win [X]?\", \"What happens to [X]?\", \"Can [X] succeed?\", \"What's the future of X?\", foresight analysis, scenario planning, STEEEP analysis, futures cone, prediction requests, or any question about a future outcome. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. Also activate when the user says \"predict\", \"forecast\", \"what are the odds\", \"scenario analysis\", or asks about com...

Query Solana wallets, tokens, txs, and NFTs in USD.

Use when drafting a SOSP author response during the pre-PC-meeting rebuttal window, keeping it within the venue's norms — correcting factual errors, answering direct reviewer questions, staying near the 500-word guidance, and never introducing new experiments, new data, or promises of future work.

Use when reasoning about how a SOSP submission is evaluated — double-blind HotCRP reviewing, staged review rounds, PC-chair-audited conflicts, the pre-PC-meeting author response, the single-track PC meeting where every decision is argued live, notification, and shepherded acceptance outcomes.

Use when deciding whether a systems project is SOSP-shaped — a built and measured artifact embodying an extractable principle in operating and distributed systems — or better routed to OSDI, EuroSys, USENIX ATC, NSDI, FAST, ASPLOS, VLDB, MLSys, or HotOS, and when to make that call in the project's life.

Problem-solving strategies for source coding in information theory

Generous whitespace, consistent padding, and grid-based layouts for clean, readable, and breathing interfaces.

'Execute Speak primary workflow: AI Conversation Practice with real-time feedback. Use when implementing conversation practice features, building AI tutor interactions, or core language learning dialogue systems. Trigger with phrases like \"speak conversation practice\", \"speak AI tutor\", \"speak dialogue\", \"primary speak workflow\". '

'Configure Speak for schools and organizations: SSO, teacher/student roles, class management, and usage reporting. Use when implementing enterprise rbac, or managing Speak language learning platform operations. Trigger with phrases like \"speak enterprise rbac\", \"speak enterprise rbac\". '

'Handle Speak lesson completion events, progress webhooks, and achievement notifications. Use when implementing webhooks events, or managing Speak language learning platform operations. Trigger with phrases like \"speak webhooks events\", \"speak webhooks events\". '

Sync delta specs to main specs before closure. Invoke while an executing change has delta specs to merge into the main spec base, or when detecting spec drift across multiple changes.

Turn vague intent into a precise, executable spec in five phases. (gstack)

Decompose a multi-feature or multi-component specification into factory-consumable artifacts. Use this for high-complexity work — multiple features, three or more components, or parallel-eligible workstreams.

Decompose a single-feature specification into a linear, phase-by-phase implementation plan. Use this for medium-complexity work — single feature, one or two components — where transparent human-in-the-loop phase review is preferred over factory automation.

SpecKit Safe Update

Launch RSVP speed reader for text

>- Run automatic SPICE simulations on subcircuits detected from KiCad schematic analysis — validates filter frequencies, divider ratios, opamp gains, LC resonance, and crystal load capacitance. Supports ngspice, LTspice, and Xyce (auto-detected). Generates testbenches, runs batch mode, produces structured pass/warn/fail report. Use when the user asks to simulate, verify, or validate any analog subcircuit — RC filters, LC filters, voltage dividers, opamp circuits, crystal oscillators. Also for...

Throwaway experiments to validate an idea before build.

Use when building the theoretical argument of a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript into a contribution to sociological social psychology — whether the work is in the symbolic-interaction, social-structure-and-personality, group-processes, identity, or affect tradition. SPQ rewards an explicit social-psychological mechanism linking structure to the individual, not a bare finding. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

Spring Boot patterns including JPA repositories, REST controllers, layered services, and configuration

Use when tightening the logical argument and conceptual rigor of a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — making concept definitions explicit, ensuring each section advances the core proposition, and keeping theoretical / normative reasoning valid (not replaced by data tables). Applies to theoretical, normative, and historical-comparative papers as much as empirical ones.

Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — replacing policy-report tone and empty-significance phrases with scholarly argument, keeping a grand-but-restrained register, and ensuring paragraph-leading topic sentences. Use after the proposition and argument are settled.

Use when deciding which ssc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from problematic framing through rebuttal for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

当收到《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 外审意见、需要撰写审稿意见答复信与修回说明时调用。指导如何逐条回应每位审稿人与编委的意见、在修改稿中标注对应位置、以数据与理由而非情绪回应质疑、区分\"已修改/已澄清/保留并说明\"、处理相互矛盾的意见、控制修回轮次与时限，并保持中文学术礼节。适用于退修（大修/小修）后的 revise-and-resubmit 阶段，与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 的修回习惯相通但以本刊中文流程为准。