Claude Skills by testdouble

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase — including requests to audit module boundaries, check for architectural smells, or inform refactoring decisions. Requires a specif...

Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code — or when they ask to make sure, verify, or validate that code follows good coding standards, is free of errors or bugs, has sufficient test coverage, or meets best practices, even if they never use the word \"review.\" Triggers for any request to assess code quality, correctness, or security of specific files, directories, or the current branch. Also use...

Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another — including spec-vs-implementation gaps, PRD-vs-shipped-feature gaps, design-vs-build gaps, requirements-vs-code audits, or any "what's missing from X compared to Y" question — and wants a human-readable report rather than raw analy...

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan — including terse commands like "iterate", "refine it", or "iterate for correctness" where a plan is present in context. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach ...

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation — including requests like "help me plan X", "spec out this feature", "design the Y flow", or "let's figure out what it should do". Explores the codebase, project documentation, coding ...

Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a project-manager-led team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified — including requests like "plan the implementation of X", "how do we build this", "turn this spec into an implementation plan", or "figure out how we'd actually ship this". Launches a team of specialist sub-agents sized to the featu...