Claude Skills by sunyifeisb-art

Drafting a motion for temporary orders in a high-conflict divorce requires integrating child custody, spousal support, and asset-restraining provisions into a single filing, supported by a client declaration with financial documentation and a proposed order that conforms to any applicable standing orders and local rules.

Draft the creditor-notification package for a probate proceeding by coordinating publication notice with personal notice to known creditors, distinguishing among different claim categories, and documenting the notification process for the estate file.

Drafting a comprehensive parenting plan requires translating mediator recommendations and case-specific child-care, medical, therapeutic, and school-related information into a legally complete residential schedule and decision-making framework, with a companion cover memo addressing risks and open issues.

Drafting a petition for final distribution in probate requires reconciling the final accounting, identifying and reserving for claims and expenses, confirming tax compliance, and preparing a court-ready petition with a proposed order and distribution summary.

Drafting a petition for probate and qualification of a personal representative requires confirming will validity, addressing capacity and codicil interaction, identifying non-probate assets, and flagging title, creditor, and multi-jurisdiction administration issues in a companion cover memorandum.

Drafting a postnuptial agreement under Illinois law requires reviewing any prior marital agreement, reconciling financial disclosure materials with valuation information, addressing compensation units and business ownership characterization, and documenting independent counsel representation and voluntariness for enforceability.

Drafting a pour-over will that coordinates with a revocable living trust for a blended family estate requires identifying assets not funded into the trust, confirming the trust's current operative version, and flagging prenuptial agreement interactions and execution requirements in a companion issues memo.

Closes the framing gap where agents produce generic prenuptial agreements without reconciling conflicting source documents, defining a jurisdiction-appropriate business appreciation methodology, and resolving structural interaction risks between spousal support provisions and career-interruption credits.

Closes the gap where agents transcribe founder governance directives verbatim without identifying provisions that conflict with private foundation requirements and federal tax law — including mandatory distribution obligations, dissolution provisions, and conflict-of-interest standards.

Closes the gap where agents draft QDROs without resolving the separate-interest-vs.-shared-payment design choice, locking in the coverture fraction denominator, addressing survivor benefit requirements, and producing each plan's QDRO as a standalone document.

Draft an opposition brief to a motion seeking modification of custody and child support by applying the governing modification standard, testing the evidentiary basis for the requested changes, and organizing rebuttal arguments around the motion’s issues and the record.

Closes the gap where agents draft generic revocable trust agreements without resolving cross-document conflicts, flagging coordination issues for retirement and deferred compensation beneficiary designations, and addressing distribution conditions that raise public policy or tax concerns.

Closes the gap where agents produce generic dissolution trial briefs without applying the governing marital-property framework, resolving competing business valuation methodologies, building a documented dissipation record with burden-shifting analysis, and completing mandatory filing requirements.

Closes the gap where agents produce trust accountings without cross-checking source documents for misclassifications, allocation errors, valuation issues, and separate identification of tax-exempt income.

Closes the gap where agents rely exclusively on the filed financial disclosure without cross-referencing source documents to identify omitted assets, stale or unsupported valuations, inappropriate depreciation on non-depreciable personal property, and contested valuation methodologies.

Focuses the agent on extracting asset, liability, and income data from a sworn financial declaration into a structured workbook, reconciling totals across schedules, computing equity where appropriate, and flagging stale, unsupported, or classification-sensitive entries for follow-up.

Closes the gap where agents list beneficiary designations without tracing contingent and derivative beneficiaries, flagging handwritten amendment validity risks, identifying accounts with no effective designation, and addressing retirement-account distribution implications for non-spouse beneficiaries.

Closes the gap where agents compile flat asset lists without categorized subtotals, correct treatment of inherited retirement-account spousal rollover rights and distribution compliance, partnership-interest valuation discount notation, and installment-note tax and estate consequences.

Closes the gap where agents extract stated facts without flagging common family-law intake issues such as possible prenuptial enforceability concerns tied to timing and counsel access, inheritance commingling and tracing questions, suspicious business expenses as potential dissipation, cryptocurrency transfers that may require tracing or interim relief, retirement-account division mechanics, and the need to assess whether maintenance may flow in either direction.

Extract and organize key facts from a disorganized client intake for a contested divorce matter, with emphasis on asset characterization, potential dissipation, transfer timing, and the client’s stated priorities.

Produces a comprehensive estate asset schedule that classifies each asset by disposition pathway, reconciles values across source materials, identifies unresolved value or title questions, and flags planning or reporting issues for retirement accounts and closely held business interests.

Focuses the analysis on reconciling a sworn financial disclosure against supporting financial records to identify omitted assets, suspicious transfers suggesting dissipation, and unsupported valuation positions — and on computing a corrected total that reflects the identified adjustments.

Closes the gap where agents list creditor claims without computing the applicable claims filing deadline, identifying potentially untimely claims, prorating invoices that straddle the relevant cutoff date, correcting arithmetic errors in invoices, and producing an adjusted total claims figure with a reconciliation.

Closes the gap where agents summarize a custody evaluation report without applying the governing best-interest factors, cross-referencing supporting documents against the evaluator's methodology, and providing litigation strategy recommendations for each identified gap or inconsistency.

Closes the gap where agents summarize distribution provisions at a general level without computing adjusted figures, applying section-by-section prohibition conditions to each pending request, flagging ambiguous expense definitions, and identifying trust protector conflicts that affect the approval process.

Closes the gap where agents compile asset schedules using a net worth summary without verifying whether irrevocable trust assets are incorrectly included in the client's owned-asset total, and without identifying ineffective beneficiary designations and their estate and income tax consequences.

Closes the gap where agents catalog exhibits in isolation without linking related financial documents to identify undisclosed accounts, quantifying income understatement across all sources, connecting account balance declines to specific transfers, and building a complete asset summary table.

Closes the gap where agents compile intake financial facts without independently verifying arithmetic in client-prepared expense documents, reconciling stated aggregate income against separately listed components, flagging active-versus-passive appreciation issues on inherited accounts, and identifying tracing requirements for retirement accounts.

Closes the gap where agents list settlement-agreement provisions without cross-referencing the agreement text against attached exhibits for numerical discrepancies, identifying ambiguous support-termination conditions, flagging post-decree filing deadline risk created by a phased engagement, and noting enforcement gaps in ongoing reporting and contribution obligations.

Closes the gap where agents produce generic signing checklists without identifying signatories who cannot complete required steps at the ceremony, flagging document-specific formal requirements and applying witness disqualification rules to named witnesses.

Closes the gap where agents review business valuations without independently checking the underlying arithmetic, identifying normalization adjustment omissions, assessing whether valuation discounts are appropriate in the dissolution context, and linking pre-separation account withdrawals to potential dissipation issues.

Closes the gap where agents review adoption home study packages by checking background check timing, reference count and composition, registry-search documentation, evaluator independence, and unresolved discrepancies against the applicable adoption requirements.

Closes the gap where agents review postnuptial agreements without applying the governing jurisdiction’s enforceability standards, identifying incomplete financial disclosure, flagging support-waiver limits, and assessing the economic asymmetry of one-sided provisions.

Closes the gap where agents identify surface-level prenuptial issues without challenging the adequacy of financial disclosure, flagging relevant enforcement considerations, assessing maintenance waiver unconscionability risk, and identifying provisions that may be unenforceable or overbroad.

Closes the gap where agents summarize opposing motions without carefully comparing stated financial figures to source records, identifying omissions from sworn financial declarations, challenging lay witness opinion testimony that exceeds competence bounds, and assessing the legal standard for the specific relief requested.

Focuses the analysis on identifying defects in a proposed parenting plan by comparing the plan’s actual residential schedule to its label, checking the plan against the governing jurisdiction’s mandatory requirements, and evaluating whether the proposed allocation of time and decision-making is internally consistent and practically workable.

Closes the gap where agents identify discovery deficiencies without computing procedural deadlines and waiver consequences, quantifying the impact of omissions, connecting suspicious transfers to dissipation, and flagging sworn declaration arithmetic errors.

Closes the gap where agents identify will deficiencies without applying the governing jurisdiction’s interested witness rule precisely, analyzing testamentary capacity through medical and medication evidence, addressing the divorce–beneficiary designation disconnect, and identifying an executor–trustee–beneficiary conflict’s specific implication for estate administration choices.

Closes the gap where agents review probate petitions without checking the surviving spouse's statutory elective share against the testamentary provision, identifying required notice for charitable bequests, flagging interested-witness issues involving a drafting lawyer or firm, and analyzing how a no-contest clause interacts with statutory spousal rights.

Closes the gap where agents review proposed dissolution decrees without independently verifying property and support calculations, applying tranche-specific analysis to equity compensation, identifying assets that may be misclassified as separate or marital property, and flagging procedural requirements for support deviations and related provisions.

Reviews a dynasty trust draft for structural and drafting issues, including beneficiary-trustee distribution authority, trustee substitution or removal powers, spendthrift and creditor-protection provisions, GST allocation mechanics, and completion of required trust-administration checklist items, using a category-based legal analysis without relying on scenario-specific facts or conclusions.

Closes the gap where agents summarize opposing temporary-orders motions without applying the correct property-characterization doctrine to inherited assets, challenging one-sided asset-freeze requests against the mutual-restraint standard, evaluating third-party declarations for personal-knowledge limitations, and assessing whether a custody reversal request is supported by the applicable best-interest factors.

Helps an agent review a contested divorce settlement proposal for asset characterization, support, tax, parenting, and release-language issues, with attention to quantification where the record permits and to preserving future enforcement and modification rights.

Generalizes the settlement-issue spotting workflow for a contested divorce proposal, with emphasis on checking support-duration assumptions against the marriage-length context, verifying whether equity-compensation division uses a coverture-style fraction for each vesting tranche, and noting when one asset allocation is being used to justify trade-offs in another area.

Review a multigenerational estate plan for common drafting, fiduciary, and beneficiary-designation issues, including retirement-account beneficiary structure, retained-control concerns in irrevocable trusts, administrative formalities for gift-tax planning, formula provisions tied to exemption mechanics, capacity-sensitive implementation steps, digital-asset access planning, special-needs trust drafting, cross-document consistency, and choice-of-law complexity.

Reviews a multigenerational estate plan for common issue-spotting and drafting gaps, with attention to retained-control estate inclusion risks, supplemental-benefits trust design, inherited-retirement-account trust drafting, and health-information authorization coverage.

Negotiation analysis memo comparing a government counter-markup of a deferred prosecution agreement against a prior defense markup, identifying gaps in undefined terms, monitor scope, cooperation obligations, payment structure, statement-of-facts edits, and other material provisions where the government has rejected or modified defense positions.

Gap analysis memorandum comparing a rolling document production set against subpoena request categories, identifying collection gaps, coding guide deficiencies, privilege log completeness issues, and potential bad-faith or obstruction risk from non-responsive classification of plainly responsive documents.

Gap analysis memorandum comparing collected employee communications against an SEC referral notice, identifying communication log gaps, potential spoliation, instructions to employees not to discuss the matter, and obstruction or whistleblower suppression exposure.

Gap analysis memorandum comparing a grand jury subpoena's scope against a corporate document retention policy and destruction records, identifying when the preservation obligation arose, which destructions occurred before versus after that obligation, and the spoliation risk associated with each gap.